Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Symbolist Critics and the Death of the Author, 1905–1910

View through CrossRef
This chapter contextualizes the twenty-fifth anniversary of Fyodor Dostoevsky's death as a turning point in the writer's cultural and critical reception. The 1905 Russian Revolution had intensified the ongoing conflict between Dostoevsky's religious views and his political affiliations. Whether they renounced him or clung tighter to his image, different generations of the Symbolist school—including Dmitry Merezhkovsky, Andrei Belyi, and Viacheslav Ivanov—attempted to take Dostoevsky into an uncertain future at a time when his ideas were breaking away from the biographical persona that for some had previously anchored them. Their embrace of text over author was not the Formalist rejection of biography as a mode of analysis; it arose instead from the demands of their own radical ideologies, personal religious convictions, spiritual eclecticism, and creative activity. Looking in particular at the radical shift in Merezhkovsky's reading of Dostoevsky's cultural value and the unrecognized centrality of Dostoevsky to Ivanov's collaboration with the controversial “mystical anarchist” movement, the chapter is about the beginning of the end of Dostoevsky as author and the inception of his autonomous textual existence. Along the way the text emerges as a transmuted object capable of stimulating new faith in their version of Dostoevsky.
Cornell University Press
Title: Symbolist Critics and the Death of the Author, 1905–1910
Description:
This chapter contextualizes the twenty-fifth anniversary of Fyodor Dostoevsky's death as a turning point in the writer's cultural and critical reception.
The 1905 Russian Revolution had intensified the ongoing conflict between Dostoevsky's religious views and his political affiliations.
Whether they renounced him or clung tighter to his image, different generations of the Symbolist school—including Dmitry Merezhkovsky, Andrei Belyi, and Viacheslav Ivanov—attempted to take Dostoevsky into an uncertain future at a time when his ideas were breaking away from the biographical persona that for some had previously anchored them.
Their embrace of text over author was not the Formalist rejection of biography as a mode of analysis; it arose instead from the demands of their own radical ideologies, personal religious convictions, spiritual eclecticism, and creative activity.
Looking in particular at the radical shift in Merezhkovsky's reading of Dostoevsky's cultural value and the unrecognized centrality of Dostoevsky to Ivanov's collaboration with the controversial “mystical anarchist” movement, the chapter is about the beginning of the end of Dostoevsky as author and the inception of his autonomous textual existence.
Along the way the text emerges as a transmuted object capable of stimulating new faith in their version of Dostoevsky.

Related Results

Pet Euthanasia and Human Euthanasia
Pet Euthanasia and Human Euthanasia
Photo ID 213552852 © Yuryz | Dreamstime.com Abstract A criticism of assisted death is that it’s contrary to the Hippocratic Oath. This opposition to assisted death assumes that dea...
Double Exposure
Double Exposure
I. Happy Endings Chaplin’s Modern Times features one of the most subtly strange endings in Hollywood history. It concludes with the Tramp (Chaplin) and the Gamin (Paulette Godda...
Finding The Ideal: Clothing And Gender In Symbolist Art
Finding The Ideal: Clothing And Gender In Symbolist Art
<p> This Major Research Project explores the role of clothing in Symbolist visual art at the end of the nineteenth century. Through a formal visual analysis of clothing in a ...
Finding The Ideal: Clothing And Gender In Symbolist Art
Finding The Ideal: Clothing And Gender In Symbolist Art
<p> This Major Research Project explores the role of clothing in Symbolist visual art at the end of the nineteenth century. Through a formal visual analysis of clothing in a ...
Sex, Sign, Subversion: Symbolist Art and Male Homosexuality in 19th-Century Europe
Sex, Sign, Subversion: Symbolist Art and Male Homosexuality in 19th-Century Europe
There is something queer about Symbolism. Art historians have long acknowledged the links between Symbolist aesthetics and contemporaneous ideas about human sexuality, and even a c...
Review Essays
Review Essays
Book reviewed in this article:SORTING OUT THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG CHRISTIAN VALUES, US POPULAR RELIGION, AND HOLLYWOOD FILMS: SCREENING THE SACRED: RELIGION, MYTH AND IDEOLOGY IN P...
Learning to die: Creative voices of acceptance
Learning to die: Creative voices of acceptance
Section 1. Death Phobia, Death Acceptance, And Death Positivity in The Twenty-First Century 1.Introduction The renowned philosopher Martin Heidegger penned an influential tome titl...

Back to Top