Javascript must be enabled to continue!
GRiMeDB: the Global River Methane Database of concentrations and fluxes
View through CrossRef
Abstract. Despite their small spatial extent, fluvial ecosystems play a significant role in processing and transporting carbon in aquatic networks, which
results in substantial emission of methane (CH4) into the atmosphere. For this reason, considerable effort has been put into identifying patterns and drivers of CH4 concentrations in streams and rivers and estimating fluxes to the atmosphere across broad spatial scales. However, progress toward these ends has been slow because of pronounced spatial and temporal variability of lotic CH4 concentrations and fluxes and
by limited data availability across diverse habitats and physicochemical conditions. To address these challenges, we present a comprehensive
database of CH4 concentrations and fluxes for fluvial ecosystems along with broadly relevant and concurrent physical and chemical
data. The Global River Methane Database (GriMeDB; https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/f48cdb77282598052349e969920356ef, Stanley et al., 2023) includes 24 024 records of CH4 concentration and 8205 flux measurements from 5029 unique sites derived from publications, reports, data repositories,
unpublished data sets, and other outlets that became available between 1973 and 2021. Flux observations are reported as diffusive, ebullitive, and
total CH4 fluxes, and GriMeDB also includes 17 655 and 8409 concurrent measurements of concentrations and 4444 and 1521 fluxes for carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O), respectively. Most observations are date-specific (i.e., not site averages), and many are supported by data for 1 or more of 12 physicochemical variables and 6 site variables. Site variables include codes to characterize marginal channel types
(e.g., springs, ditches) and/or the presence of human disturbance (e.g., point source inputs, upstream dams). Overall, observations in GRiMeDB encompass the broad range of the climatic, biological, and physical conditions that occur among world river basins, although some geographic gaps remain (arid
regions, tropical regions, high-latitude and high-altitude systems). The global median CH4 concentration (0.20 µmol L−1) and diffusive flux (0.44 mmolm-2d-1) in GRiMeDB are lower than estimates from prior site-averaged compilations, although ranges
(0 to 456 µmol L−1 and −136 to 4057 mmolm-2d-1) and standard deviations (10.69 and 86.4) are greater for this larger and more temporally resolved database. Available flux data are dominated by diffusive measurements despite the recognized importance of ebullitive
and plant-mediated CH4 fluxes. Nonetheless, GriMeDB provides a comprehensive and cohesive resource for examining relationships between
CH4 and environmental drivers, estimating the contribution of fluvial ecosystems to CH4 emissions, and contextualizing site-based investigations.
Title: GRiMeDB: the Global River Methane Database of concentrations and fluxes
Description:
Abstract.
Despite their small spatial extent, fluvial ecosystems play a significant role in processing and transporting carbon in aquatic networks, which
results in substantial emission of methane (CH4) into the atmosphere.
For this reason, considerable effort has been put into identifying patterns and drivers of CH4 concentrations in streams and rivers and estimating fluxes to the atmosphere across broad spatial scales.
However, progress toward these ends has been slow because of pronounced spatial and temporal variability of lotic CH4 concentrations and fluxes and
by limited data availability across diverse habitats and physicochemical conditions.
To address these challenges, we present a comprehensive
database of CH4 concentrations and fluxes for fluvial ecosystems along with broadly relevant and concurrent physical and chemical
data.
The Global River Methane Database (GriMeDB; https://doi.
org/10.
6073/pasta/f48cdb77282598052349e969920356ef, Stanley et al.
, 2023) includes 24 024 records of CH4 concentration and 8205 flux measurements from 5029 unique sites derived from publications, reports, data repositories,
unpublished data sets, and other outlets that became available between 1973 and 2021.
Flux observations are reported as diffusive, ebullitive, and
total CH4 fluxes, and GriMeDB also includes 17 655 and 8409 concurrent measurements of concentrations and 4444 and 1521 fluxes for carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O), respectively.
Most observations are date-specific (i.
e.
, not site averages), and many are supported by data for 1 or more of 12 physicochemical variables and 6 site variables.
Site variables include codes to characterize marginal channel types
(e.
g.
, springs, ditches) and/or the presence of human disturbance (e.
g.
, point source inputs, upstream dams).
Overall, observations in GRiMeDB encompass the broad range of the climatic, biological, and physical conditions that occur among world river basins, although some geographic gaps remain (arid
regions, tropical regions, high-latitude and high-altitude systems).
The global median CH4 concentration (0.
20 µmol L−1) and diffusive flux (0.
44 mmolm-2d-1) in GRiMeDB are lower than estimates from prior site-averaged compilations, although ranges
(0 to 456 µmol L−1 and −136 to 4057 mmolm-2d-1) and standard deviations (10.
69 and 86.
4) are greater for this larger and more temporally resolved database.
Available flux data are dominated by diffusive measurements despite the recognized importance of ebullitive
and plant-mediated CH4 fluxes.
Nonetheless, GriMeDB provides a comprehensive and cohesive resource for examining relationships between
CH4 and environmental drivers, estimating the contribution of fluvial ecosystems to CH4 emissions, and contextualizing site-based investigations.
Related Results
GRiMeDB: The global river database of methane concentrations and fluxes
GRiMeDB: The global river database of methane concentrations and fluxes
Abstract. Despite their small spatial extent, fluvial ecosystems play a significant role in processing and transporting carbon in aquatic networks, which results in substantial emi...
Comparison of Methane Control Methods in Polish and Vietnamese Coal Mines
Comparison of Methane Control Methods in Polish and Vietnamese Coal Mines
Methane hazard often occurs in hard coal mines and causes very serious accidents and can be the reason of methane or methane and coal dust explosions. History of coal mining shows ...
Short-term changes in anaerobic oxidation of methane in response to varying methane and sulfate fluxes
Short-term changes in anaerobic oxidation of methane in response to varying methane and sulfate fluxes
Abstract. A major role in global methane fluxes has been attributed to the process of anaerobic oxidation of methane, which is performed by consortia of methanotrophic archaea and ...
Study on Characteristics and Model Prediction of Methane Emissions in Coal Mines: A Case Study of Shanxi Province, China
Study on Characteristics and Model Prediction of Methane Emissions in Coal Mines: A Case Study of Shanxi Province, China
The venting of methane from coal mining is China’s main source of methane emissions. Accurate and up-to-date methane emission factors for coal mines are significant for reporting a...
Addressing Misunderstandings and Supporting Sonsistency in the Methane Discourse
Addressing Misunderstandings and Supporting Sonsistency in the Methane Discourse
Abstract
Policymakers and stakeholders target methane as a significant contributor of global warming and so expectations to better understand and reduce methane emis...
Methane Emission Estimation Tools as a Basis for Sustainable Underground Mining of Gas-Bearing Coal Seams
Methane Emission Estimation Tools as a Basis for Sustainable Underground Mining of Gas-Bearing Coal Seams
Underground coal mining of gas-bearing coal seams is accompanied by the emission of large amounts of methane, which increases with depth. Coal seam methane is not only a major caus...
Nanoscale pore structure in anthracite coals and its effect on methane adsorption capacity
Nanoscale pore structure in anthracite coals and its effect on methane adsorption capacity
Although significant amounts of methane are present in anthracite coal seams, coalbed methane resources cannot be extracted effectively and quickly. This study mainly focused on in...
The Classification and Model of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs
The Classification and Model of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs
Abstract Coalbed methane has been explored in many basins worldwide for 30 years, and has been developed commercially in some of the basins. Many researchers have described the ch...

