Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Levantine Art in the “Orientalizing” Period
View through CrossRef
The “Orientalizing period” represents a scholarly designation used to describe the eighth and seventh centuries bce when regions in Greece, Italy, and farther west witnessed a flourishing of arts and cultures attributed to contact with cultural areas to the east—in particular that of the Phoenicians. This chapter surveys Orientalizing as an intellectual and historiographic concept and reconsiders the role of purportedly Phoenician arts within the existing scholarly narratives. The Orientalizing period should be understood as a construct of nineteenth- and twentieth-century scholarship that was structured around a false dichotomy between the Orient (the East) and the West. The designation “Phoenician” has a similarly complex historiographic past rooted in ancient Greek stereotyping that has profoundly shaped modern scholarly interpretations. This chapter argues that the luxury arts most often credited as agents of Orientalization—most prominent among them being carved ivories, decorated metal bowls, and engraved tridacna shells—cannot be exclusively associated with a Phoenician cultural origin, thus calling into question the primacy of the Phoenicians in Orientalizing processes. Each of these types of objects appears to have a much broader production sphere than is indicated by the attribute as Phoenician. In addition, the notion of unidirectional influences flowing from east to west is challenged, and instead concepts of connectivity and networking are proposed as more useful frameworks for approaching the problem of cultural relations during the early part of the first millennium bce.
Oxford University Press
Title: Levantine Art in the “Orientalizing” Period
Description:
The “Orientalizing period” represents a scholarly designation used to describe the eighth and seventh centuries bce when regions in Greece, Italy, and farther west witnessed a flourishing of arts and cultures attributed to contact with cultural areas to the east—in particular that of the Phoenicians.
This chapter surveys Orientalizing as an intellectual and historiographic concept and reconsiders the role of purportedly Phoenician arts within the existing scholarly narratives.
The Orientalizing period should be understood as a construct of nineteenth- and twentieth-century scholarship that was structured around a false dichotomy between the Orient (the East) and the West.
The designation “Phoenician” has a similarly complex historiographic past rooted in ancient Greek stereotyping that has profoundly shaped modern scholarly interpretations.
This chapter argues that the luxury arts most often credited as agents of Orientalization—most prominent among them being carved ivories, decorated metal bowls, and engraved tridacna shells—cannot be exclusively associated with a Phoenician cultural origin, thus calling into question the primacy of the Phoenicians in Orientalizing processes.
Each of these types of objects appears to have a much broader production sphere than is indicated by the attribute as Phoenician.
In addition, the notion of unidirectional influences flowing from east to west is challenged, and instead concepts of connectivity and networking are proposed as more useful frameworks for approaching the problem of cultural relations during the early part of the first millennium bce.
Related Results
The Orientalizing Revolution in Early Archaic Greece: An Imaginative Concept and its Representations
The Orientalizing Revolution in Early Archaic Greece: An Imaginative Concept and its Representations
The term “orientalizing revolution”, first put forward by John Boardman in 1990, gained a wide audience after the publication of Walter Burkert’s book The Orientalizing Revolution....
orientalizing
orientalizing
Orientalizing has two primary uses in studies about ancient Mediterranean society: as an art historical or archaeological phase designation (the Orientalizing period) and as a gene...
Egypt and the Levant in the 1st millennium B.C. on the ceramic material of the Memphite region: New data
Egypt and the Levant in the 1st millennium B.C. on the ceramic material of the Memphite region: New data
The article analyzes Levantine ceramics of the 1st millennium B.C., discovered in the Memphite region including the materials of the Russian Archaeological Mission at Giza. Memphis...
Modeling geomagnetic spikes: the Levantine Iron Age anomaly
Modeling geomagnetic spikes: the Levantine Iron Age anomaly
AbstractThe Levantine Iron Age anomaly (LIAA) is a regional short-decadal geomagnetic strength field variation located at the Levantine region characterized by high intensities wit...
PRE-COLONIAL LATIN COLONIES AND THE TRANSITION TO THE MID-REPUBLICAN PERIOD IN THE FALISCAN AREA AND SOUTH ETRURIA: ORIENTALIZING, ARCHAIC AND LATE ARCHAIC SETTLEMENT AND FUNERARY EVIDENCE FROM THE NEPI SURVEY
PRE-COLONIAL LATIN COLONIES AND THE TRANSITION TO THE MID-REPUBLICAN PERIOD IN THE FALISCAN AREA AND SOUTH ETRURIA: ORIENTALIZING, ARCHAIC AND LATE ARCHAIC SETTLEMENT AND FUNERARY EVIDENCE FROM THE NEPI SURVEY
This paper discusses the survey evidence from the Orientalizing and Archaic settlement and funerary sites at Nepi (ancient Nepet), one of the first Latin colonies outside Latium ad...
The Orientalizing Period: Influence of Near Eastern on the Greek World
The Orientalizing Period: Influence of Near Eastern on the Greek World
The Orientalizing period, which occurred from around the mid-8th to mid-7th centuries B. C. E. , was characterised by the obvious
influence of Eastern culture on different aspec...
Analysis of Late Antique and Medieval Glass from Koper (Capodistria, Si): Insight into Glass Consumption and Produc-Tion at the Turn of First Millennium CE
Analysis of Late Antique and Medieval Glass from Koper (Capodistria, Si): Insight into Glass Consumption and Produc-Tion at the Turn of First Millennium CE
A series (n=22) of glasses from the site Kapucinski vrt (garden of the Capuchin monastery, 5th-17th c. CE) in Koper (Capodistria), a port town in northern Adriatic, was measured by...
ASSYRIA GRAMMATA: How Did Greeks in the Orientalizing Period Encounter Near Eastern Literature?
ASSYRIA GRAMMATA: How Did Greeks in the Orientalizing Period Encounter Near Eastern Literature?
Abstract
A vexing problem for scholars of the so-called Orientalizing Period (ca. 750–600
bce
) is tr...

