Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Levantine Art in the “Orientalizing” Period

View through CrossRef
The “Orientalizing period” represents a scholarly designation used to describe the eighth and seventh centuries bce when regions in Greece, Italy, and farther west witnessed a flourishing of arts and cultures attributed to contact with cultural areas to the east—in particular that of the Phoenicians. This chapter surveys Orientalizing as an intellectual and historiographic concept and reconsiders the role of purportedly Phoenician arts within the existing scholarly narratives. The Orientalizing period should be understood as a construct of nineteenth- and twentieth-century scholarship that was structured around a false dichotomy between the Orient (the East) and the West. The designation “Phoenician” has a similarly complex historiographic past rooted in ancient Greek stereotyping that has profoundly shaped modern scholarly interpretations. This chapter argues that the luxury arts most often credited as agents of Orientalization—most prominent among them being carved ivories, decorated metal bowls, and engraved tridacna shells—cannot be exclusively associated with a Phoenician cultural origin, thus calling into question the primacy of the Phoenicians in Orientalizing processes. Each of these types of objects appears to have a much broader production sphere than is indicated by the attribute as Phoenician. In addition, the notion of unidirectional influences flowing from east to west is challenged, and instead concepts of connectivity and networking are proposed as more useful frameworks for approaching the problem of cultural relations during the early part of the first millennium bce.
Title: Levantine Art in the “Orientalizing” Period
Description:
The “Orientalizing period” represents a scholarly designation used to describe the eighth and seventh centuries bce when regions in Greece, Italy, and farther west witnessed a flourishing of arts and cultures attributed to contact with cultural areas to the east—in particular that of the Phoenicians.
This chapter surveys Orientalizing as an intellectual and historiographic concept and reconsiders the role of purportedly Phoenician arts within the existing scholarly narratives.
The Orientalizing period should be understood as a construct of nineteenth- and twentieth-century scholarship that was structured around a false dichotomy between the Orient (the East) and the West.
The designation “Phoenician” has a similarly complex historiographic past rooted in ancient Greek stereotyping that has profoundly shaped modern scholarly interpretations.
This chapter argues that the luxury arts most often credited as agents of Orientalization—most prominent among them being carved ivories, decorated metal bowls, and engraved tridacna shells—cannot be exclusively associated with a Phoenician cultural origin, thus calling into question the primacy of the Phoenicians in Orientalizing processes.
Each of these types of objects appears to have a much broader production sphere than is indicated by the attribute as Phoenician.
In addition, the notion of unidirectional influences flowing from east to west is challenged, and instead concepts of connectivity and networking are proposed as more useful frameworks for approaching the problem of cultural relations during the early part of the first millennium bce.

Related Results

The Orientalizing Revolution in Early Archaic Greece: An Imaginative Concept and its Representations
The Orientalizing Revolution in Early Archaic Greece: An Imaginative Concept and its Representations
The term “orientalizing revolution”, first put forward by John Boardman in 1990, gained a wide audience after the publication of Walter Burkert’s book The Orientalizing Revolution....
Egypt and the Levant in the 1st millennium B.C. on the ceramic material of the Memphite region: New data
Egypt and the Levant in the 1st millennium B.C. on the ceramic material of the Memphite region: New data
The article analyzes Levantine ceramics of the 1st millennium B.C., discovered in the Memphite region including the materials of the Russian Archaeological Mission at Giza. Memphis...
Modeling geomagnetic spikes: the Levantine Iron Age anomaly
Modeling geomagnetic spikes: the Levantine Iron Age anomaly
AbstractThe Levantine Iron Age anomaly (LIAA) is a regional short-decadal geomagnetic strength field variation located at the Levantine region characterized by high intensities wit...
The Orientalizing Period: Influence of Near Eastern on the Greek World
The Orientalizing Period: Influence of Near Eastern on the Greek World
The Orientalizing period, which occurred from around the mid-8th to mid-7th centuries B. C. E. , was characterised by the obvious influence of Eastern culture on different aspec...
Refunctioned Levantine Heritage in İzmir: A Study on Buca and Bornova
Refunctioned Levantine Heritage in İzmir: A Study on Buca and Bornova
The concept of refunctioning offers multifaceted advantages encompassing social, economic, and ecological dimensions. In contemporary times, the adaptive reuse of historical buildi...
Levantine Epigraphy and Phoenicia: the Kingdoms of Aradus, Byblos, Sidon and Tyre during the Achaemenid Period
Levantine Epigraphy and Phoenicia: the Kingdoms of Aradus, Byblos, Sidon and Tyre during the Achaemenid Period
Our knowledge of Phoenicia during the Achaemenid period has made important progresses during the last thirty-five years thanks to new epigraphic discoveries and researches: the suc...
Canaanite Roots, Proto-Phoenicia, and the Early Phoenician Period
Canaanite Roots, Proto-Phoenicia, and the Early Phoenician Period
The origins and ethnogenesis of a cultural entity, people, and territory referred to as “Phoenician” in later biblical and Classical sources and modern scholarship remain a topic o...

Back to Top