Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Linguistic sleuthing for innovators
View through CrossRef
AbstractFor centuries “innovation” has been a topic of book authors and academic researchers as documented by Ngram and Google Scholar search results. In contrast, “innovators” have had substantially less attention in both the popular domain and the academic domain. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a text analysis research methodology to linguistically identify “innovators” and “non-innovators” using Hebert F. Crovitz’s 42 relational words. Specifically, we demonstrate how to combine the use of two complementary text analysis software programs: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count and WORDij to simply count the percent of use of these relational words and determine the statistical difference in use between “innovators” and “non-innovators.” We call this the “Crovitz Innovator Identification Method” in honor of Herbert F. Crovitz, who envisioned the possibility of using a small group of 42 words to signal “innovation” language. The Crovitz Innovator Identification Method is inexpensive, fast, scalable, and ready to be applied by others using this example as their guide. Nevertheless, this method does not confirm the viability of any innovation being created, used or implemented; it simply detects how a person’s language signals innovative thinking. We invite other scholars to join us in this linguistic sleuthing for innovators.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Linguistic sleuthing for innovators
Description:
AbstractFor centuries “innovation” has been a topic of book authors and academic researchers as documented by Ngram and Google Scholar search results.
In contrast, “innovators” have had substantially less attention in both the popular domain and the academic domain.
The purpose of this paper is to introduce a text analysis research methodology to linguistically identify “innovators” and “non-innovators” using Hebert F.
Crovitz’s 42 relational words.
Specifically, we demonstrate how to combine the use of two complementary text analysis software programs: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count and WORDij to simply count the percent of use of these relational words and determine the statistical difference in use between “innovators” and “non-innovators.
” We call this the “Crovitz Innovator Identification Method” in honor of Herbert F.
Crovitz, who envisioned the possibility of using a small group of 42 words to signal “innovation” language.
The Crovitz Innovator Identification Method is inexpensive, fast, scalable, and ready to be applied by others using this example as their guide.
Nevertheless, this method does not confirm the viability of any innovation being created, used or implemented; it simply detects how a person’s language signals innovative thinking.
We invite other scholars to join us in this linguistic sleuthing for innovators.
Related Results
Innovators' careers
Innovators' careers
• The success or failure of most organizations is heavily dependent on innovation. However, this innovation is only possible through a special group of employees: the socalled inno...
Лінгвостилістичні студії Надії Бабич
Лінгвостилістичні студії Надії Бабич
In recent years linguists have become increasingly interested in the linguistic-stylistic studies of the scholars, who contributed to the formation of stylistics as a science and i...
Linguistic personality in culture: research areas
Linguistic personality in culture: research areas
The article deals with the definition of linguistic personality in the context of the relationship between language and culture. Language as a cultural phenomenon in determining th...
Cognitive training incorporating temporal information processing improves linguistic and non-linguistic functions in people with aphasia
Cognitive training incorporating temporal information processing improves linguistic and non-linguistic functions in people with aphasia
AbstractPeople with aphasia (PWA) often present deficits in non-linguistic cognitive functions, such as executive functions, working memory, and temporal information processing (TI...
Linguistic Areas
Linguistic Areas
“Linguistic areas” are defined as social spaces (regions, countries, (sub-)continents) in which languages from different families have influenced each other significantly, leading ...
Language and White Supremacy
Language and White Supremacy
White supremacy is a racial order that relies on a presumed “natural” superiority of whiteness and assigns to all groups racialized as non-white biological or cultural characterist...
Linguistic Anthropology
Linguistic Anthropology
Alternatively called linguistic anthropology or anthropological linguistics, this subfield of anthropology is dedicated to the study of the contextual impact of language on society...
Separating layers of information
Separating layers of information
Abstract
Linguistic areas, or Sprachbünde, can be described very broadly as geographical areas where a group of languages have become similar to each other because of prolonged con...

