Javascript must be enabled to continue!
2358. Safety Profiles of Three Major Types of COVID-19 Vaccine among Two Cohorts of People Living with HIV
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Existing data on adverse effects (AEs) of COVID-19 vaccines among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) are currently limited.
Methods
A cohort study was conducted among PLHIV receiving care at two clinics during COVID-19 epidemics in Thailand (2021-2022). The PLHIV received various types and regimens of COVID-19 vaccines based on vaccine availability and the national policies. Data on vaccine types and AEs were collected and assessed using the online survey system.
Results
Of the 398 vaccinated PLHIV, 365 (92%) had CD4 count at enrollment ≥ 200 cells/µL, 382 (96%) were virologic suppressed, 153 received two doses and 245 received three doses of COVID-19 vaccines. Inactivated and viral vector were the most common vaccine types received by the PLHIV as the first and second doses (47% and 56%, respectively), while mRNA vaccine was the most commonly used as a booster dose (57%). For the first and second vaccine doses, the most common AEs were fever (15% and 11%) and injection site pain (11% and 11%). The mRNA vaccine significantly caused more overall AEs, injection pain, fatigue, and rashes than the other two types, while the mRNA and viral vector vaccines significantly caused more fever than the inactivated vaccine. For a booster dose, viral vector vaccine significantly caused more injection site pain and headache than the other two types. Most of the PLHIV reported that the AE intensity was similar between the first and second doses (49%) and was more for a booster dose compared to the first dose (50%). The majority of all AEs of the first, second and booster doses spontaneously recovered without treatment (55%, 59%, and 59%) or required symptomatic treatment without hospitalization (44%, 40% and 40%). By multivariable analysis, receipt of viral vector or mRNA vaccine and age less than 40 years were independently associated with any AEs of the primary series vaccines, while having AEs from the previous dose and female sex were factors associated with any AEs of a booster vaccine.
Conclusion
The three types of COVID-19 vaccines were generally safe among PLHIV. Most of the AEs were non-severe and did not require hospitalization. PLHIV who were elderly, female or had AEs from the previous vaccine dose should be closely monitored for AEs of the vaccines.
Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: 2358. Safety Profiles of Three Major Types of COVID-19 Vaccine among Two Cohorts of People Living with HIV
Description:
Abstract
Background
Existing data on adverse effects (AEs) of COVID-19 vaccines among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) are currently limited.
Methods
A cohort study was conducted among PLHIV receiving care at two clinics during COVID-19 epidemics in Thailand (2021-2022).
The PLHIV received various types and regimens of COVID-19 vaccines based on vaccine availability and the national policies.
Data on vaccine types and AEs were collected and assessed using the online survey system.
Results
Of the 398 vaccinated PLHIV, 365 (92%) had CD4 count at enrollment ≥ 200 cells/µL, 382 (96%) were virologic suppressed, 153 received two doses and 245 received three doses of COVID-19 vaccines.
Inactivated and viral vector were the most common vaccine types received by the PLHIV as the first and second doses (47% and 56%, respectively), while mRNA vaccine was the most commonly used as a booster dose (57%).
For the first and second vaccine doses, the most common AEs were fever (15% and 11%) and injection site pain (11% and 11%).
The mRNA vaccine significantly caused more overall AEs, injection pain, fatigue, and rashes than the other two types, while the mRNA and viral vector vaccines significantly caused more fever than the inactivated vaccine.
For a booster dose, viral vector vaccine significantly caused more injection site pain and headache than the other two types.
Most of the PLHIV reported that the AE intensity was similar between the first and second doses (49%) and was more for a booster dose compared to the first dose (50%).
The majority of all AEs of the first, second and booster doses spontaneously recovered without treatment (55%, 59%, and 59%) or required symptomatic treatment without hospitalization (44%, 40% and 40%).
By multivariable analysis, receipt of viral vector or mRNA vaccine and age less than 40 years were independently associated with any AEs of the primary series vaccines, while having AEs from the previous dose and female sex were factors associated with any AEs of a booster vaccine.
Conclusion
The three types of COVID-19 vaccines were generally safe among PLHIV.
Most of the AEs were non-severe and did not require hospitalization.
PLHIV who were elderly, female or had AEs from the previous vaccine dose should be closely monitored for AEs of the vaccines.
Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures.
Related Results
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) surface glycoproteins, including shared epitope motifs, sho...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
Capítulo 6 – HIV-AIDS, como tratar, o que fazer e o que não fazer durante o tratamento?
Capítulo 6 – HIV-AIDS, como tratar, o que fazer e o que não fazer durante o tratamento?
A infecção pelo vírus do HIV pode ocorrer de diversas maneiras, tendo sua principal forma a via sexual por meio do sexo desprotegido. O vírus do HIV fica em um período de incubação...
Laboratory-based Evaluation of Wondfo HIV1/2 Rapid Test Kits in the Gambia, December 2020
Laboratory-based Evaluation of Wondfo HIV1/2 Rapid Test Kits in the Gambia, December 2020
Background: HIV rapid diagnosis in The Gambia is mainly done using Determine HIV-1/2 and First Response HIV 1.2.0 or SD Bioline HIV-1/2 3.0 for screening and sero-typing of HIV res...
Impact of HIV/AIDS scale-up on non-HIV priority services in Nyanza Province, Kenya
Impact of HIV/AIDS scale-up on non-HIV priority services in Nyanza Province, Kenya
Background: The HIV pandemic has attracted unprecedented scale-up in resources to curb its escalation and manage those afflicted. Although evidence from developing countries sugges...
Evaluasi peningkatan pengetahuan tentang HIV/AIDS dan sikap terhadap ODHA di SMK Gelora Jaya Nusantara
Evaluasi peningkatan pengetahuan tentang HIV/AIDS dan sikap terhadap ODHA di SMK Gelora Jaya Nusantara
Background: HIV/AIDS remains a global health problem in Indonesia, with major barriers being misunderstandings, social stigma, and ineffective educational approaches. The level of ...
Implementasi Kebijakan Tatalaksana HIV di Puskesmas Kabupaten Sleman
Implementasi Kebijakan Tatalaksana HIV di Puskesmas Kabupaten Sleman
Background: HIV AIDS is still a global and national challenge. The government is trying to control it by expanding access to HIV treatment at the Puskesmas, including 4 Puskesmas i...

