Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

2358. Safety Profiles of Three Major Types of COVID-19 Vaccine among Two Cohorts of People Living with HIV

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Existing data on adverse effects (AEs) of COVID-19 vaccines among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) are currently limited. Methods A cohort study was conducted among PLHIV receiving care at two clinics during COVID-19 epidemics in Thailand (2021-2022). The PLHIV received various types and regimens of COVID-19 vaccines based on vaccine availability and the national policies. Data on vaccine types and AEs were collected and assessed using the online survey system. Results Of the 398 vaccinated PLHIV, 365 (92%) had CD4 count at enrollment ≥ 200 cells/µL, 382 (96%) were virologic suppressed, 153 received two doses and 245 received three doses of COVID-19 vaccines. Inactivated and viral vector were the most common vaccine types received by the PLHIV as the first and second doses (47% and 56%, respectively), while mRNA vaccine was the most commonly used as a booster dose (57%). For the first and second vaccine doses, the most common AEs were fever (15% and 11%) and injection site pain (11% and 11%). The mRNA vaccine significantly caused more overall AEs, injection pain, fatigue, and rashes than the other two types, while the mRNA and viral vector vaccines significantly caused more fever than the inactivated vaccine. For a booster dose, viral vector vaccine significantly caused more injection site pain and headache than the other two types. Most of the PLHIV reported that the AE intensity was similar between the first and second doses (49%) and was more for a booster dose compared to the first dose (50%). The majority of all AEs of the first, second and booster doses spontaneously recovered without treatment (55%, 59%, and 59%) or required symptomatic treatment without hospitalization (44%, 40% and 40%). By multivariable analysis, receipt of viral vector or mRNA vaccine and age less than 40 years were independently associated with any AEs of the primary series vaccines, while having AEs from the previous dose and female sex were factors associated with any AEs of a booster vaccine. Conclusion The three types of COVID-19 vaccines were generally safe among PLHIV. Most of the AEs were non-severe and did not require hospitalization. PLHIV who were elderly, female or had AEs from the previous vaccine dose should be closely monitored for AEs of the vaccines. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Title: 2358. Safety Profiles of Three Major Types of COVID-19 Vaccine among Two Cohorts of People Living with HIV
Description:
Abstract Background Existing data on adverse effects (AEs) of COVID-19 vaccines among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) are currently limited.
Methods A cohort study was conducted among PLHIV receiving care at two clinics during COVID-19 epidemics in Thailand (2021-2022).
The PLHIV received various types and regimens of COVID-19 vaccines based on vaccine availability and the national policies.
Data on vaccine types and AEs were collected and assessed using the online survey system.
Results Of the 398 vaccinated PLHIV, 365 (92%) had CD4 count at enrollment ≥ 200 cells/µL, 382 (96%) were virologic suppressed, 153 received two doses and 245 received three doses of COVID-19 vaccines.
Inactivated and viral vector were the most common vaccine types received by the PLHIV as the first and second doses (47% and 56%, respectively), while mRNA vaccine was the most commonly used as a booster dose (57%).
For the first and second vaccine doses, the most common AEs were fever (15% and 11%) and injection site pain (11% and 11%).
The mRNA vaccine significantly caused more overall AEs, injection pain, fatigue, and rashes than the other two types, while the mRNA and viral vector vaccines significantly caused more fever than the inactivated vaccine.
For a booster dose, viral vector vaccine significantly caused more injection site pain and headache than the other two types.
Most of the PLHIV reported that the AE intensity was similar between the first and second doses (49%) and was more for a booster dose compared to the first dose (50%).
The majority of all AEs of the first, second and booster doses spontaneously recovered without treatment (55%, 59%, and 59%) or required symptomatic treatment without hospitalization (44%, 40% and 40%).
By multivariable analysis, receipt of viral vector or mRNA vaccine and age less than 40 years were independently associated with any AEs of the primary series vaccines, while having AEs from the previous dose and female sex were factors associated with any AEs of a booster vaccine.
Conclusion The three types of COVID-19 vaccines were generally safe among PLHIV.
Most of the AEs were non-severe and did not require hospitalization.
PLHIV who were elderly, female or had AEs from the previous vaccine dose should be closely monitored for AEs of the vaccines.
Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Related Results

Capítulo 6 – HIV-AIDS, como tratar, o que fazer e o que não fazer durante o tratamento?
Capítulo 6 – HIV-AIDS, como tratar, o que fazer e o que não fazer durante o tratamento?
A infecção pelo vírus do HIV pode ocorrer de diversas maneiras, tendo sua principal forma a via sexual por meio do sexo desprotegido. O vírus do HIV fica em um período de incubação...
Laboratory-based Evaluation of Wondfo HIV1/2 Rapid Test Kits in the Gambia, December 2020
Laboratory-based Evaluation of Wondfo HIV1/2 Rapid Test Kits in the Gambia, December 2020
Background: HIV rapid diagnosis in The Gambia is mainly done using Determine HIV-1/2 and First Response HIV 1.2.0 or SD Bioline HIV-1/2 3.0 for screening and sero-typing of HIV res...
Impact of HIV/AIDS scale-up on non-HIV priority services in Nyanza Province, Kenya
Impact of HIV/AIDS scale-up on non-HIV priority services in Nyanza Province, Kenya
Background: The HIV pandemic has attracted unprecedented scale-up in resources to curb its escalation and manage those afflicted. Although evidence from developing countries sugges...
Stigma Kills
Stigma Kills
Stigma due to an HIV diagnosis is a well-known phenomenon and is a major barrier to accessing care.1Over the last forty years, HIV has been transformed from a fatal disease to a ma...
Scenario of HIV infection in Pakistan
Scenario of HIV infection in Pakistan
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, which was previously lethal, has evolved into a chronic disease that may be treated and well-managed. HIV levels in the bloodstream ma...
Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine hesitancy and intention to take the vaccine
Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine hesitancy and intention to take the vaccine
Background: The pandemic is at a paradoxical stage, with vaccine roll out initiated but a significantly elevated level of infection and death. Hope for recovery lies in high equita...
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among adults in Hawassa City Administration, Sidama Region, Ethiopia: A community-based study
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among adults in Hawassa City Administration, Sidama Region, Ethiopia: A community-based study
ObjectiveThe COVID-19 vaccine is one of the key measures to control the disease. However, some people are hesitant to take the vaccine. The objective of this study was to assess CO...

Back to Top