Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Status of the medical oncology workforce. The American Society of Clinical Oncology.
View through CrossRef
PURPOSE A survey was designed to determine accurately the number of full-time equivalent medical oncologists in the United States, to determine how medical oncologists in different work settings divide their professional activities, and to determine whether medical oncology represents a primary care specialty in the minds of practicing oncologists. METHODS A questionnaire was mailed to the 4,239 members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) who identified themselves as medical oncologists or hematologists/oncologists and were current residents of the United States. Follow-up letters, which included a second copy of the questionnaire, were sent to nonresponders. A third mailing, followed by a telephone reminder, was sent to a randomly selected subset of 300 nonresponders to be certain that the initial responders were similar in practice patterns and attitudes to those individuals who had not initially completed the survey. RESULTS A total of 2,540 physicians responded to the first mailing and an additional 187 to the second (64% response rate); a further 196 individuals who were directly contacted completed the survey document. Practitioners appear to see 160 to 200 different patients per month and to devote approximately 72% of their time to patient care activities. Research and teaching comprised only 3% to 4% of professional time for physicians in private practice or Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) settings, in contrast to 16% for those who worked in community hospitals. Medical oncologists frequently serve the role of principal care giver while patients are undergoing cancer treatment. However, medical oncologists devote minimal time providing primary care services to patients and, if required to increase their clinical volume, would prefer to care for more cancer patients than enhance their primary care activities. It is estimated that the present full-time equivalent number (ie, the conglomorate number of oncologists based on 100% professional effort devoted to clinical care) of medical oncologists is approximately 3,600 individuals. This translates into 1.8 medical oncologists per 100,000 adult Americans. CONCLUSION The medical oncology community devotes the majority of its time to providing oncologic patient care and does not provide or appear to wish to provide what the public defines as primary care. The survey estimate of 1.8 medical oncologists per 100,000 adult Americans is in close accord with HMO estimates of the number of desired oncologists. Consequently, the supply appears consistent with the anticipated demand. There does not appear to be an oversupply of medical oncologists in the United States.
Title: Status of the medical oncology workforce. The American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Description:
PURPOSE A survey was designed to determine accurately the number of full-time equivalent medical oncologists in the United States, to determine how medical oncologists in different work settings divide their professional activities, and to determine whether medical oncology represents a primary care specialty in the minds of practicing oncologists.
METHODS A questionnaire was mailed to the 4,239 members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) who identified themselves as medical oncologists or hematologists/oncologists and were current residents of the United States.
Follow-up letters, which included a second copy of the questionnaire, were sent to nonresponders.
A third mailing, followed by a telephone reminder, was sent to a randomly selected subset of 300 nonresponders to be certain that the initial responders were similar in practice patterns and attitudes to those individuals who had not initially completed the survey.
RESULTS A total of 2,540 physicians responded to the first mailing and an additional 187 to the second (64% response rate); a further 196 individuals who were directly contacted completed the survey document.
Practitioners appear to see 160 to 200 different patients per month and to devote approximately 72% of their time to patient care activities.
Research and teaching comprised only 3% to 4% of professional time for physicians in private practice or Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) settings, in contrast to 16% for those who worked in community hospitals.
Medical oncologists frequently serve the role of principal care giver while patients are undergoing cancer treatment.
However, medical oncologists devote minimal time providing primary care services to patients and, if required to increase their clinical volume, would prefer to care for more cancer patients than enhance their primary care activities.
It is estimated that the present full-time equivalent number (ie, the conglomorate number of oncologists based on 100% professional effort devoted to clinical care) of medical oncologists is approximately 3,600 individuals.
This translates into 1.
8 medical oncologists per 100,000 adult Americans.
CONCLUSION The medical oncology community devotes the majority of its time to providing oncologic patient care and does not provide or appear to wish to provide what the public defines as primary care.
The survey estimate of 1.
8 medical oncologists per 100,000 adult Americans is in close accord with HMO estimates of the number of desired oncologists.
Consequently, the supply appears consistent with the anticipated demand.
There does not appear to be an oversupply of medical oncologists in the United States.
Related Results
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Evaluation of NCI Designated Cancer Centers medical student education and training initiatives.
Evaluation of NCI Designated Cancer Centers medical student education and training initiatives.
9032
Background:
The rising incidence of common cancers, an aging oncology workforce, and workforce shortages underscore the importanc...
2.G. Workshop: The health labour market and the human face of the health workforce: analysis, advocacy and action
2.G. Workshop: The health labour market and the human face of the health workforce: analysis, advocacy and action
Abstract
Background
Health workforce research and data have significantly improved over recent years. Many countries have steppe...
Accuracy of medical oncology prognosis for patients with metastatic cancer evaluated for enrollment onto an ongoing randomized clinical trial.
Accuracy of medical oncology prognosis for patients with metastatic cancer evaluated for enrollment onto an ongoing randomized clinical trial.
12063 Background: For patients with metastatic cancer, a key aspect of interdisciplinary care has involved the overall prognosis provided by Medical Oncology, which often dictates...
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Since his death in 1922, Henry Lawson’s “spirit” has been kept alive by admirers across Australia. Over the last century, Lawson’s reputation in the academy has fluctuated yet fan ...
Skills building seminar: Building skills and capacity for a future health workforce
Skills building seminar: Building skills and capacity for a future health workforce
Abstract
Background
It is increasingly recognised that there is ‘no health without a workforce’ and that action has to be taken ...
National survey on the effect of oncology drug shortages in clinical practice: A Hematology Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA) survey.
National survey on the effect of oncology drug shortages in clinical practice: A Hematology Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA) survey.
e13609 Background: Drug shortages are a clear and growing challenge. Prominent shortages included oncology medications and supportive care products essential for the care of cance...
Optimizing Georgia’s Public Health Workforce: A Study on Demographics, Engagement, and Capacity Building
Optimizing Georgia’s Public Health Workforce: A Study on Demographics, Engagement, and Capacity Building
Abstract
Background:
A well-functioning public health system relies on a robust public health workforce. Comprehensive data on the workforce, such as number, distri...

