Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The practical relevance of management accounting research and the role of qualitative methods therein

View through CrossRef
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present and analyze the opinions of a number of editors of accounting journals on the value they attach to the practical relevance of management accounting research and the potential role of qualitative methods in conducting this type of research.Design/methodology/approachThis paper collects together commentaries from these journal editors about the theme indicated above, together with an overview and reflections by the editors of this special issue.FindingsThe journal editors do not regard a lack of practical relevance in management accounting research as a key concern. Most of them see practice‐relevance and theoretical advancement as complementary, while the latter is given by far the most weight as the core of academic work. Furthermore, most journal editors have no clear preference for either qualitative or quantitative research in relation to the practical relevance issue. Neither do they seem to have strong opinions about the specific benefits of qualitative methods in practice‐relevant studies. In their commentaries, the editors of this special issue advocate a stronger connection between the needs of practitioners and the content of the research, more interventionist research in which practitioners and researchers work together, and a greater focus on communication between academics and practitioners about the practical implications of management accounting research. The special issue editors specifically emphasize the importance of this communication in relation to safeguarding the “support” of various groups in society for academic research.Practical implicationsThe paper contributes to the ongoing debate about the practical relevance of management accounting research, and particularly to the role of qualitative methods in practice‐relevant studies.Originality/valueBy collecting and analyzing the opinions of editors of several prominent accounting journals on the practice‐relevance of the research in this field, a contribution is made to the ongoing debate about this issue.
Title: The practical relevance of management accounting research and the role of qualitative methods therein
Description:
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present and analyze the opinions of a number of editors of accounting journals on the value they attach to the practical relevance of management accounting research and the potential role of qualitative methods in conducting this type of research.
Design/methodology/approachThis paper collects together commentaries from these journal editors about the theme indicated above, together with an overview and reflections by the editors of this special issue.
FindingsThe journal editors do not regard a lack of practical relevance in management accounting research as a key concern.
Most of them see practice‐relevance and theoretical advancement as complementary, while the latter is given by far the most weight as the core of academic work.
Furthermore, most journal editors have no clear preference for either qualitative or quantitative research in relation to the practical relevance issue.
Neither do they seem to have strong opinions about the specific benefits of qualitative methods in practice‐relevant studies.
In their commentaries, the editors of this special issue advocate a stronger connection between the needs of practitioners and the content of the research, more interventionist research in which practitioners and researchers work together, and a greater focus on communication between academics and practitioners about the practical implications of management accounting research.
The special issue editors specifically emphasize the importance of this communication in relation to safeguarding the “support” of various groups in society for academic research.
Practical implicationsThe paper contributes to the ongoing debate about the practical relevance of management accounting research, and particularly to the role of qualitative methods in practice‐relevant studies.
Originality/valueBy collecting and analyzing the opinions of editors of several prominent accounting journals on the practice‐relevance of the research in this field, a contribution is made to the ongoing debate about this issue.

Related Results

Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
<p><strong><span dir="ltr" role="presentation">1. Introduction</span></strong&...
Organization of equity accounting process technology
Organization of equity accounting process technology
Introduction. The lack of a clear organization of equity accounting in enterprises with foreign investment causes problems in the formation of accounting and analytical support for...
ACCOUNTІNG POLІCY AND ORGANІZATІON: ELEMENTS AND OBJECTS
ACCOUNTІNG POLІCY AND ORGANІZATІON: ELEMENTS AND OBJECTS
In the article is considered the problem of accounting policy of the enterprise, the organization of accounting, and the peculiarities of the impact on them of their objects and el...
Research paradigms, theoretical pluralism and the practical relevance of management accounting knowledge
Research paradigms, theoretical pluralism and the practical relevance of management accounting knowledge
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to discuss how practical relevance of management accounting knowledge relates to research paradigms and theoretical pluralism.Design/methodology...

Back to Top