Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Deity in the Definite Article: lassaw' and related terms for Ba'al in Jeremiah
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT The general consensus is that the abstract noun saw ' (ו א )in the HB/OT, with the basic meaning of worthlessness, inefficacy, deceit, emptiness, falsehood, lie, could refer either to these qualities in general (typically translated in the English as "in vain"), or could refer to anti-Yahweh idolatry. The choice has been rather arbitrary and inconsistent, relying on the reader's view of what the text would want to convey. This study builds on the assumption that the definiteness of the noun determines its semantic value, and should be a major factor in determining the general versus polemic meaning of saw' (שׁו), although this grammatico-semantic distinction is unaccounted for in standard lexicons and most commentaries. The study limits itself to the book of Jeremiah, where saw ' only appears in its definite form, as lassãw'. Remarkably three other similarly defined nouns are located in the same text blocks in Jeremiah, namely hasseqer, habboset and hahebel (mostly with prefixed prepositions). Thefact that they all have indefinite counterparts in Jeremiah, strengthens the argument that the presence or absence of the definite article is not arbitrary, but noteworthy and meaningful. The fact that these four determined nouns (hassãw ', hasseqer, habboset and hahebel) all function in the same broader text in Jeremiah, with the deity Ba'al also mentioned consistently and exclusively in the definite form (mostly singular habba'al, rarely plural habbe 'alïm) leads to the hypothesis that the defined nouns under discussion are all references to Ba'al, with a suggested rhetorical function of disparagement of the deity. The plausibility of the hypothesis is tested in this particular study by means of an exegetical exercise which zooms in on the interface of the nouns under discussion in a selected range of texts. The exegetical approach is obviously launched from the mentioned theoretical stance, seeking to discover features of the text that support interpretation in line with the hypothesis. Keywords: Jeremiah; Baal; exegesis.
Title: The Deity in the Definite Article: lassaw' and related terms for Ba'al in Jeremiah
Description:
ABSTRACT The general consensus is that the abstract noun saw ' (ו א )in the HB/OT, with the basic meaning of worthlessness, inefficacy, deceit, emptiness, falsehood, lie, could refer either to these qualities in general (typically translated in the English as "in vain"), or could refer to anti-Yahweh idolatry.
The choice has been rather arbitrary and inconsistent, relying on the reader's view of what the text would want to convey.
This study builds on the assumption that the definiteness of the noun determines its semantic value, and should be a major factor in determining the general versus polemic meaning of saw' (שׁו), although this grammatico-semantic distinction is unaccounted for in standard lexicons and most commentaries.
The study limits itself to the book of Jeremiah, where saw ' only appears in its definite form, as lassãw'.
Remarkably three other similarly defined nouns are located in the same text blocks in Jeremiah, namely hasseqer, habboset and hahebel (mostly with prefixed prepositions).
Thefact that they all have indefinite counterparts in Jeremiah, strengthens the argument that the presence or absence of the definite article is not arbitrary, but noteworthy and meaningful.
The fact that these four determined nouns (hassãw ', hasseqer, habboset and hahebel) all function in the same broader text in Jeremiah, with the deity Ba'al also mentioned consistently and exclusively in the definite form (mostly singular habba'al, rarely plural habbe 'alïm) leads to the hypothesis that the defined nouns under discussion are all references to Ba'al, with a suggested rhetorical function of disparagement of the deity.
The plausibility of the hypothesis is tested in this particular study by means of an exegetical exercise which zooms in on the interface of the nouns under discussion in a selected range of texts.
The exegetical approach is obviously launched from the mentioned theoretical stance, seeking to discover features of the text that support interpretation in line with the hypothesis.
Keywords: Jeremiah; Baal; exegesis.
Related Results
Lassaw, Ibram (1913–2003)
Lassaw, Ibram (1913–2003)
A sculptor of the New York School, Ibram Lassaw was born to Russian parents in Alexandria, Egypt. The family immigrated to Brooklyn, NY, in 1921, where Lassaw learned modeling, cas...
Emeline and Jeremiah
Emeline and Jeremiah
On November 2, 1850, Jeremiah Root published a “Notice” in the Sacramento Transcript offering a reward for the arrest of his wife, Emeline, who had absconded with a younger man, tw...
Tantric Temples
Tantric Temples
Tantra begins in India and is exported from there, in Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain thought streams. There is material evidence of temples built according to the precepts given in the ...
The Historical Jeremiah
The Historical Jeremiah
Abstract
Jeremiah scholars are generally cautious in drawing assumptions about the historical reliability of the material found in the book of Jeremiah. Yet the sour...
Jeremiah in Lamentations
Jeremiah in Lamentations
Abstract
The prophetic figure of Jeremiah has long been associated with the book of Lamentations. The earliest known attribution of Lamentations to Jeremiah dates to...
Jeremiah and Homiletics
Jeremiah and Homiletics
Abstract
This chapter explores homiletical possibilities afforded by the book of Jeremiah to the Christian preacher. The earliest layers of contextualization are exa...

