Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Mikhailovskii, Nikolai Konstantinovich (1842–1904)

View through CrossRef
Along with Lavrov, N.K. Mikhailovskii, a non-academic social theorist and literary critic, was the most representative and influential thinker of Russian populism. His most distinctive contribution to populist ideology was his attempt to reconcile the ’principle of individuality’, so dear to the Russian intelligentsia, with the old, communal ’principles of the people’, represented by the non-Westernized Russian peasantry. Unlike Herzen and Lavrov, Mikhailovskii did not see the principle of individuality as a product of Western progress, that is to say, as something which should be introduced from outside to the archaic world of Russian village commune. He challenged the stereotype which associated individualism with the capitalist West; instead, he tried to prove that the principle of individuality was in fact fully compatible with old Russian communalism, and incompatible with Western-type modernization. He did so by a radical redefinition of the very concept of individuality. For him individuality was not the product of a process of ’individualization’ in the sense of loosening the communal bonds, making people socially differentiated, functionally specialized and separated from each other. On the contrary, by individuality he meant the ’inner wholeness’, that is to say, the non-alienated, many-sided and harmonious development of human beings. Following the romantic critics of modernity, he claimed that individuality, so conceived, was being destroyed by capitalist progress. Mikhailovskii’s notion of individuality was similar to the Slavophile ideal of ’integral personality’. Unlike Slavophilism, however, Mikhailovskii’s ‘sociological romanticism’ was bound up with a secularist worldview and a semi-positivist position in philosophy. For this reason its affinity with Slavophile romantic anticapitalism was relatively inconsequential and remained unnoticed.
Title: Mikhailovskii, Nikolai Konstantinovich (1842–1904)
Description:
Along with Lavrov, N.
K.
Mikhailovskii, a non-academic social theorist and literary critic, was the most representative and influential thinker of Russian populism.
His most distinctive contribution to populist ideology was his attempt to reconcile the ’principle of individuality’, so dear to the Russian intelligentsia, with the old, communal ’principles of the people’, represented by the non-Westernized Russian peasantry.
Unlike Herzen and Lavrov, Mikhailovskii did not see the principle of individuality as a product of Western progress, that is to say, as something which should be introduced from outside to the archaic world of Russian village commune.
He challenged the stereotype which associated individualism with the capitalist West; instead, he tried to prove that the principle of individuality was in fact fully compatible with old Russian communalism, and incompatible with Western-type modernization.
He did so by a radical redefinition of the very concept of individuality.
For him individuality was not the product of a process of ’individualization’ in the sense of loosening the communal bonds, making people socially differentiated, functionally specialized and separated from each other.
On the contrary, by individuality he meant the ’inner wholeness’, that is to say, the non-alienated, many-sided and harmonious development of human beings.
Following the romantic critics of modernity, he claimed that individuality, so conceived, was being destroyed by capitalist progress.
Mikhailovskii’s notion of individuality was similar to the Slavophile ideal of ’integral personality’.
Unlike Slavophilism, however, Mikhailovskii’s ‘sociological romanticism’ was bound up with a secularist worldview and a semi-positivist position in philosophy.
For this reason its affinity with Slavophile romantic anticapitalism was relatively inconsequential and remained unnoticed.

Related Results

Nikolai Konstantinovich Mosolov is an Unwilling Historian of Namibia
Nikolai Konstantinovich Mosolov is an Unwilling Historian of Namibia
The study of the history of Namibia in Russian historiography was not sufficiently complete. Meanwhile, a significant contribution to the description of the most important pages of...
ИМПЕРАТОР НИКОЛАЙ II. ХОЗЯИН ЗЕМЛИ РУССКОЙ
ИМПЕРАТОР НИКОЛАЙ II. ХОЗЯИН ЗЕМЛИ РУССКОЙ
В статье рассматриваются основные этапы жизни и деятельности императора России Николая II, его вклад в становление и развитие Российской империи на рубеже XIX ‒ XX веков. Представл...
Dirty footprints and degenerate archives: Tabitha Nikolai’s impure walking sims
Dirty footprints and degenerate archives: Tabitha Nikolai’s impure walking sims
Tabitha Nikolai’s Shrine Maidens of the Unseelie Court and Ineffable Glossolalia are impure specimens of the walking sim. While these are still first-person games that see players ...
Between Ideology and Desire: Rhetoric of the Self in the Works of Nikolai Chernyshevskii and Nikolai Dobroliubov
Between Ideology and Desire: Rhetoric of the Self in the Works of Nikolai Chernyshevskii and Nikolai Dobroliubov
Departing from the familiar scholarly focus on the ideological content of works by intelligentsia forerunners, this article examines the record of everyday life in their private an...
Die Reise des Entomologen Hermann Loew nach Kleinasien in den Jahren 1841–1842
Die Reise des Entomologen Hermann Loew nach Kleinasien in den Jahren 1841–1842
Die Reise des Lehrers und Naturforschers Hermann Loew (1807–1879) in das Osmanische Reich in den Jahren 1841 und 1842 wird rekonstruiert. Sie führte ihn in die heutige westliche Tü...
Sino-French Trade at Canton, 1698-1842
Sino-French Trade at Canton, 1698-1842
Sino-French Trade at Canton, 1698–1842 fills a gap in Canton Trade scholarship with this new account of France’s near century-and-a-half experience in that trade. From the distinct...

Back to Top