Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Abstract 4367866: Prescription Stimulants Can Increase Risk of Arrhythmias: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
View through CrossRef
Background:
Centrally acting stimulants are widely prescribed for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), narcolepsy, and related neuropsychiatric conditions, but concerns persist regarding their cardiovascular safety. These agents, including amphetamines, methylphenidate, modafinil, and lisdexamfetamine, elevate sympathetic tone and may precipitate cardiac arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Yet, published data remain inconsistent and fragmented across varying designs. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the arrhythmic risk associated with commonly prescribed stimulants.
Hypothesis:
We hypothesized that prescription stimulants are associated with increased risk of incident or recurrent cardiac arrhythmias, with variable risk based on stimulant class.
Methods:
PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), APA PsycINFO (Ovid), Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched through May, 2025. Eligible studies included randomized trials, cohort studies, and case-control designs comparing stimulant use to either no stimulant or an alternative, reporting adjusted effect estimates for arrhythmia. Two reviewers screened all records (κ = 0.78), extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool. Adjusted odds, rates, and hazard ratios were converted to log-HRs and pooled using random-effects models. Between-study heterogeneity was quantified using I^2 and τ^2 ; publication bias was assessed by funnel plot.
Results:
Fourteen studies (N = 3,660,068) met the inclusion criteria. Overall stimulant use was associated with an 83% increased risk of arrhythmia (HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.34–2.50; I^2=97.6%). Amphetamines showed the highest risk (HR 2.67; 95% CI 1.41–5.06; I^2=97.6%), followed by methylphenidate (HR 1.65; 95% CI 1.24–2.21; I^2=87.8%). Sudden cardiac death or ventricular fibrillation (N=882,629) did not reach statistical significance (HR 1.45; 95% CI 0.90–2.32; I^2=68.4%). Funnel plots appeared symmetric, and meta-regression showed no substantial influence of sample size on effect estimates.
Conclusion:
All major stimulant subclasses were significantly associated with increased arrhythmia risk, with the highest risk observed in amphetamines. These findings emphasize the potential cardiovascular consequences of stimulant therapy and reinforce the need for ongoing cardiac monitoring. Further research is warranted to delineate the safety profiles of individual stimulant medications.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Abstract 4367866: Prescription Stimulants Can Increase Risk of Arrhythmias: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Description:
Background:
Centrally acting stimulants are widely prescribed for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), narcolepsy, and related neuropsychiatric conditions, but concerns persist regarding their cardiovascular safety.
These agents, including amphetamines, methylphenidate, modafinil, and lisdexamfetamine, elevate sympathetic tone and may precipitate cardiac arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
Yet, published data remain inconsistent and fragmented across varying designs.
We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the arrhythmic risk associated with commonly prescribed stimulants.
Hypothesis:
We hypothesized that prescription stimulants are associated with increased risk of incident or recurrent cardiac arrhythmias, with variable risk based on stimulant class.
Methods:
PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), APA PsycINFO (Ovid), Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched through May, 2025.
Eligible studies included randomized trials, cohort studies, and case-control designs comparing stimulant use to either no stimulant or an alternative, reporting adjusted effect estimates for arrhythmia.
Two reviewers screened all records (κ = 0.
78), extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool.
Adjusted odds, rates, and hazard ratios were converted to log-HRs and pooled using random-effects models.
Between-study heterogeneity was quantified using I^2 and τ^2 ; publication bias was assessed by funnel plot.
Results:
Fourteen studies (N = 3,660,068) met the inclusion criteria.
Overall stimulant use was associated with an 83% increased risk of arrhythmia (HR 1.
83; 95% CI 1.
34–2.
50; I^2=97.
6%).
Amphetamines showed the highest risk (HR 2.
67; 95% CI 1.
41–5.
06; I^2=97.
6%), followed by methylphenidate (HR 1.
65; 95% CI 1.
24–2.
21; I^2=87.
8%).
Sudden cardiac death or ventricular fibrillation (N=882,629) did not reach statistical significance (HR 1.
45; 95% CI 0.
90–2.
32; I^2=68.
4%).
Funnel plots appeared symmetric, and meta-regression showed no substantial influence of sample size on effect estimates.
Conclusion:
All major stimulant subclasses were significantly associated with increased arrhythmia risk, with the highest risk observed in amphetamines.
These findings emphasize the potential cardiovascular consequences of stimulant therapy and reinforce the need for ongoing cardiac monitoring.
Further research is warranted to delineate the safety profiles of individual stimulant medications.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Abstract 14018: Prevalence of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Transgender and Nonbinary Adult Community Health Center Patients
Abstract 14018: Prevalence of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Transgender and Nonbinary Adult Community Health Center Patients
Background:
Sex differences in cardiac arrhythmias are well-established and partly attributed to sex hormones.
Aim:
We aim...
Heart rhythm disorder in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome
Heart rhythm disorder in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome
Objective
To investigate the risk factors which lead to arrhythmias in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS), to explore incidence and types of a...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
P920Understanding arrhythmia mechanisms in patients with atrial septal defects
P920Understanding arrhythmia mechanisms in patients with atrial septal defects
Abstract
Background
Atrial arrhythmias represent a major cause of morbidity and hospitalization in patients with atrial septal d...
SGLT2 Inhibitors and the Risk of Arrhythmias in Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis
SGLT2 Inhibitors and the Risk of Arrhythmias in Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis
Background/Objectives: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have revolutionized heart failure (HF) therapies and are an essential component of guideline-directed medi...
Non-prescription antibiotic use and its predictors among children in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Non-prescription antibiotic use and its predictors among children in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AbstractGlobally antibiotics are among the most commonly used drugs. Non-prescription use of antibiotics is a major factor for the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance ...

