Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Vertical disparity, egocentric distance and stereoscopic depth constancy: a new interpretation

View through CrossRef
There has long been a problem concerning the presence in the visual cortex of binocularly activated cells that are selective for vertical stimulus disparities because it is generally believed that only horizontal dis­parities contribute to stereoscopic depth perception. The accepted view is that stereoscopic depth estimates are only relative to the fixation point and that independent information from an extraretinal source is needed to scale for absolute or egocentric distance. Recently, however, theor­etical computations have shown that egocentric distance can be esti­mated directly from vertical disparities without recourse to extraretinal sources. There has been little impetus to follow up these computations with experimental observations, because the vertical disparities that normally occur between the images in the two eyes have always been regarded as being too small to be of significance for visual perception and because experiments have consistently shown that our conscious appre­ciation of egocentric distance is rather crude and unreliable. Neverthe­less, the veridicality of stereoscopic depth constancy indicates that accurate distance information is available to the visual system and that the information about egocentric distance and horizontal disparity are processed together so as to continually recalibrate the horizontal dis­parity values for different absolute distances. Computations show that the recalibration can be based directly on vertical disparities without the need for any intervening estimates of absolute distance. This may partly explain the relative crudity of our conscious appreciation of egocentric distance. From published data it has been possible to calculate the magnitude of the vertical disparities that the human visual system must be able to discriminate in order for depth constancy to have the observed level of veridicality. From published data on the induced effect it has also been possible to calculate the threshold values for the detection of vertical disparities by the visual system. These threshold values are smaller than those needed to provide for the recalibration of the horizontal disparities in the interests of veridical depth constancy. An outline is given of the known properties of the binocularly activated cells in the striate cortex that are able to discriminate and assess the vertical disparities. Experi­ments are proposed that should validate, or otherwise, the concepts put forward in this paper.
Title: Vertical disparity, egocentric distance and stereoscopic depth constancy: a new interpretation
Description:
There has long been a problem concerning the presence in the visual cortex of binocularly activated cells that are selective for vertical stimulus disparities because it is generally believed that only horizontal dis­parities contribute to stereoscopic depth perception.
The accepted view is that stereoscopic depth estimates are only relative to the fixation point and that independent information from an extraretinal source is needed to scale for absolute or egocentric distance.
Recently, however, theor­etical computations have shown that egocentric distance can be esti­mated directly from vertical disparities without recourse to extraretinal sources.
There has been little impetus to follow up these computations with experimental observations, because the vertical disparities that normally occur between the images in the two eyes have always been regarded as being too small to be of significance for visual perception and because experiments have consistently shown that our conscious appre­ciation of egocentric distance is rather crude and unreliable.
Neverthe­less, the veridicality of stereoscopic depth constancy indicates that accurate distance information is available to the visual system and that the information about egocentric distance and horizontal disparity are processed together so as to continually recalibrate the horizontal dis­parity values for different absolute distances.
Computations show that the recalibration can be based directly on vertical disparities without the need for any intervening estimates of absolute distance.
This may partly explain the relative crudity of our conscious appreciation of egocentric distance.
From published data it has been possible to calculate the magnitude of the vertical disparities that the human visual system must be able to discriminate in order for depth constancy to have the observed level of veridicality.
From published data on the induced effect it has also been possible to calculate the threshold values for the detection of vertical disparities by the visual system.
These threshold values are smaller than those needed to provide for the recalibration of the horizontal disparities in the interests of veridical depth constancy.
An outline is given of the known properties of the binocularly activated cells in the striate cortex that are able to discriminate and assess the vertical disparities.
Experi­ments are proposed that should validate, or otherwise, the concepts put forward in this paper.

Related Results

Size and Shape Constancy are Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Size Constancy Illusion and Linton Shape Constancy Illusion
Size and Shape Constancy are Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Size Constancy Illusion and Linton Shape Constancy Illusion
We present two new illusions that challenges our understanding of size and shape constancy, with implications for how we should think about feedback to the primary visual cortex (V...
Linton Scale Illusion
Linton Scale Illusion
We present a new illusion that challenges our understanding of visual scale. Since Helmholtz’s ‘telestereoscope’ (1857), we’ve known that stereo vision governs visual scale, turnin...
Visual Scale is Governed by Horizontal Disparities: Linton Scale Illusion
Visual Scale is Governed by Horizontal Disparities: Linton Scale Illusion
We present a new illusion that challenges our understanding of visual scale. Since Helmholtz’s ‘telestereoscope’ (1857), we’ve known that stereo vision governs visual scale, turnin...
Visual Scale is Governed by Horizontal Disparities: Linton Scale Illusion
Visual Scale is Governed by Horizontal Disparities: Linton Scale Illusion
We present a new illusion that challenges our understanding of visual scale. Since Helmholtz’s ‘telestereoscope’ (1857), we’ve known that stereo vision governs visual scale, turnin...
Straightforward Stereoscopic Techniques for Archaeometric Interpretation of Archeological Artifacts
Straightforward Stereoscopic Techniques for Archaeometric Interpretation of Archeological Artifacts
Stereoscopic visualization plays a significant role in the detailed and accurate interpretation of various geometric features on the surface of archaeological artifacts, which can ...
Disparity sensitivity and binocular integration in mouse visual cortex areas
Disparity sensitivity and binocular integration in mouse visual cortex areas
AbstractBinocular disparity, the difference between the two eyes’ images, is a powerful cue to generate the three-dimensional depth percept known as stereopsis. In primates, binocu...
Size and Shape Constancies Do Not Affect Perceived Angular Size: Linton Size Constancy and Shape Constancy Illusions
Size and Shape Constancies Do Not Affect Perceived Angular Size: Linton Size Constancy and Shape Constancy Illusions
We present three new illusions that challenge our understanding of shape and size constancies. Traditional accounts of size constancy suggest that it distorts the perceived angular...

Back to Top