Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Informed consent in pediatric anesthesiology
View through CrossRef
SummaryBackgroundInformed consent for pediatric anesthesia is unique because it is (1) obtained from surrogates (ie, parents) rather than from the patient and (2) sought after parents have authorized the surgical intervention. There are limited data on how pediatric anesthesia informed and consent discussions are conducted. The purpose of this study was to characterize the content of preanesthesia informed consent discussions and assess their impact on parent recall and understanding.MethodsWe conducted a cross‐sectional observational study at a tertiary pediatric hospital. We audio‐recorded and transcribed preanesthesia consent discussions between pediatric anesthesia providers and parents of children undergoing elective surgery. Parents were recruited on the day of surgery and completed a survey postdiscussion to assess their recall and perceived understanding. We used directed content analysis to identify 7 informed consent elements: (i) description of the plan; mention of (ii) alternatives, (iii) risks, and (iv) benefits; (v) discussion of uncertainties; (vi) assessment of comprehension; and (vii) solicitation of a decision. We used multivariable logistic regression to explore the association between discussions that included 3 informed consent elements (description of plan, mention of risks, and mention of benefits) and parent recall and understanding of these elements.ResultsWe analyzed 97 discussions involving 41 different anesthesia providers. The element most frequently included in preanesthesia discussions was a description of the plan (100%); the least frequently included was decision solicitation (18%). Seventy‐one percent of discussions included ≥5 informed consent elements and 70% included a description of the plan, mention of risks, and mention of benefits. Parental recall of these 3 informed consent elements was associated with their inclusion in the preanesthesia discussion (75% vs 34%), and more parents understood all 3 elements if they had reported (vs not reported) recall of all 3 elements (97% vs 53%).ConclusionMost pediatric preanesthesia discussions include ≥5 informed consent elements and describe the plan, mention risks, and mention benefits. Inclusion of these latter 3 consent elements was associated with parental recall of these elements but not understanding.
Title: Informed consent in pediatric anesthesiology
Description:
SummaryBackgroundInformed consent for pediatric anesthesia is unique because it is (1) obtained from surrogates (ie, parents) rather than from the patient and (2) sought after parents have authorized the surgical intervention.
There are limited data on how pediatric anesthesia informed and consent discussions are conducted.
The purpose of this study was to characterize the content of preanesthesia informed consent discussions and assess their impact on parent recall and understanding.
MethodsWe conducted a cross‐sectional observational study at a tertiary pediatric hospital.
We audio‐recorded and transcribed preanesthesia consent discussions between pediatric anesthesia providers and parents of children undergoing elective surgery.
Parents were recruited on the day of surgery and completed a survey postdiscussion to assess their recall and perceived understanding.
We used directed content analysis to identify 7 informed consent elements: (i) description of the plan; mention of (ii) alternatives, (iii) risks, and (iv) benefits; (v) discussion of uncertainties; (vi) assessment of comprehension; and (vii) solicitation of a decision.
We used multivariable logistic regression to explore the association between discussions that included 3 informed consent elements (description of plan, mention of risks, and mention of benefits) and parent recall and understanding of these elements.
ResultsWe analyzed 97 discussions involving 41 different anesthesia providers.
The element most frequently included in preanesthesia discussions was a description of the plan (100%); the least frequently included was decision solicitation (18%).
Seventy‐one percent of discussions included ≥5 informed consent elements and 70% included a description of the plan, mention of risks, and mention of benefits.
Parental recall of these 3 informed consent elements was associated with their inclusion in the preanesthesia discussion (75% vs 34%), and more parents understood all 3 elements if they had reported (vs not reported) recall of all 3 elements (97% vs 53%).
ConclusionMost pediatric preanesthesia discussions include ≥5 informed consent elements and describe the plan, mention risks, and mention benefits.
Inclusion of these latter 3 consent elements was associated with parental recall of these elements but not understanding.
Related Results
The Pediatric Anesthesiology Workforce: Projecting Supply and Trends 2015–2035
The Pediatric Anesthesiology Workforce: Projecting Supply and Trends 2015–2035
BACKGROUND:
A workforce analysis was conducted to predict whether the projected future supply of pediatric anesthesiologists is balanced with the requirements of the in...
The Geographic Distribution of Pediatric Anesthesiologists Relative to the US Pediatric Population
The Geographic Distribution of Pediatric Anesthesiologists Relative to the US Pediatric Population
BACKGROUND:
The geographic relationship between pediatric anesthesiologists and the pediatric population has potentially important clinical and policy implications. In ...
The Current Landscape of US Pediatric Anesthesiologists: Demographic Characteristics and Geographic Distribution
The Current Landscape of US Pediatric Anesthesiologists: Demographic Characteristics and Geographic Distribution
BACKGROUND:
There is no comprehensive database of pediatric anesthesiologists, their demographic characteristics, or geographic location in the United States.
...
Requirements of informed‐consent to xenotransplantation: a qualitative interview study
Requirements of informed‐consent to xenotransplantation: a qualitative interview study
BackgroundThe aim is to establish xenotransplantation as a possible alternative to allotransplantation. The clinical application requires that patients give their informed consent ...
Development, Piloting and Evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): A protocol for a mixed methods study
Development, Piloting and Evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): A protocol for a mixed methods study
Abstract
Background: Practitioners frequently use informed consent forms to support the physician-patient communication and the informed consent process. Informed consent f...
Development, piloting, and evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): a protocol for a mixed methods study
Development, piloting, and evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): a protocol for a mixed methods study
AbstractBackgroundPractitioners frequently use informed consent forms to support the physician-patient communication and the informed consent process. Informed consent for surgery ...
Informed consent: perceptions and practice of orthopaedic trainees
Informed consent: perceptions and practice of orthopaedic trainees
AbstractBackgroundThe purpose of informed consent is to provide patients with adequate information about a proposed plan or intervention, including the benefits and risks, so that ...
Researchers’ Experiences of Obtaining Informed Consent to Participate in Human Research and Its Facilitating Factors: A Qualitative Study
Researchers’ Experiences of Obtaining Informed Consent to Participate in Human Research and Its Facilitating Factors: A Qualitative Study
Background and Objectives: Considering the lack of information about the ethical principles required to obtain informed consent, this issue should be given more attention by resear...


