Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Study of Patient-Physician Communication and Barriers in Communication

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT Context Effective doctor-patient communication is the basic requirement in building a good doctor-patient relationship. Safe practices and effective, patient-centered communication is key to quality care. Good doctor-patient communication has the potential to help regulate patients’ emotions, facilitate comprehension of medical information and allow for better identification of patients’ needs, perceptions and expectations. Doctors with better communication and interpersonal skills are able to detect problems earlier, can prevent medical crisis and expensive intervention, and provide better support to their patients. Current research indicates that ineffective communication among healthcare professionals is one of the leading causes of medical errors and patient harm. There are many barriers to good communication in the doctor-patient relationship, including patients’ anxiety and fear, doctors’ burden of work, fear of litigation, fear of physical or verbal abuse, and unrealistic patient expectations. National accreditation board for hospitals and healthcare providers (NABH) standards and international patient safety goals focus on the importance of effective communication in healthcare settings and how it leads to patient safety. This study is an attempt to identify gaps in patient physician communication in the current healthcare settings, find the barriers in communication and give recommendation to enhance good practices in the future. Aims The aim of the study is to analyze the current levels of effective patient communication in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi-NCR with help of a self-administered questionnaire. The study will assess the level of information shared with the patient. Settings and design The design of our proposed study is a descriptive study where we will use a self-administered questionnaire to assess the level of patient-physician communication in the selected study setting. Materials and methods The NABH standard were used as a guideline for preparing the self-administered questionnaire. All admitted vulnerable patients of the selected study area will consist of the population for the study. Simple random sampling technique will be used to derive the sample out of the population. Statistical analysis used Correlation and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to establish associations between the independent and dependent variables. Results The study shows that 48% of the respondents were of opinion that they were given partial information, while 20% of the respondents alleged that they were not given any information about the explanation of their disease, its prognosis and the treatment option that were available, i.e. a total of 62% of the patients said that they had partial information to complete lack of information that would have made them aware of their diseases, its prognosis and the treatments options available to cure it, while only 32% of the patients agreed that they were supplied with thorough information during their interaction with the physicians. Conclusion The majority of the patients were not wellinformed about their disease, its prognosis, treatment plan and continuity of care. There was a significant positive correlation between the communication made at initial stages of hospital stay and during the end stages of stay of patient. The main barrier to patient physician communication was time. Key message To ensure patient safety, it is imperative to inform patients about all the important aspects starting from admission till discharge. How to cite this article Sabherwal N, Mittal A, Pandey NK, Kaushal G, Kaustav P. A Study of Patient-Physician Communication and Barriers in Communication. Int J Res Foundation Hosp Healthc Adm 2015;3(2):71-78.
Title: A Study of Patient-Physician Communication and Barriers in Communication
Description:
ABSTRACT Context Effective doctor-patient communication is the basic requirement in building a good doctor-patient relationship.
Safe practices and effective, patient-centered communication is key to quality care.
Good doctor-patient communication has the potential to help regulate patients’ emotions, facilitate comprehension of medical information and allow for better identification of patients’ needs, perceptions and expectations.
Doctors with better communication and interpersonal skills are able to detect problems earlier, can prevent medical crisis and expensive intervention, and provide better support to their patients.
Current research indicates that ineffective communication among healthcare professionals is one of the leading causes of medical errors and patient harm.
There are many barriers to good communication in the doctor-patient relationship, including patients’ anxiety and fear, doctors’ burden of work, fear of litigation, fear of physical or verbal abuse, and unrealistic patient expectations.
National accreditation board for hospitals and healthcare providers (NABH) standards and international patient safety goals focus on the importance of effective communication in healthcare settings and how it leads to patient safety.
This study is an attempt to identify gaps in patient physician communication in the current healthcare settings, find the barriers in communication and give recommendation to enhance good practices in the future.
Aims The aim of the study is to analyze the current levels of effective patient communication in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi-NCR with help of a self-administered questionnaire.
The study will assess the level of information shared with the patient.
Settings and design The design of our proposed study is a descriptive study where we will use a self-administered questionnaire to assess the level of patient-physician communication in the selected study setting.
Materials and methods The NABH standard were used as a guideline for preparing the self-administered questionnaire.
All admitted vulnerable patients of the selected study area will consist of the population for the study.
Simple random sampling technique will be used to derive the sample out of the population.
Statistical analysis used Correlation and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to establish associations between the independent and dependent variables.
Results The study shows that 48% of the respondents were of opinion that they were given partial information, while 20% of the respondents alleged that they were not given any information about the explanation of their disease, its prognosis and the treatment option that were available, i.
e.
a total of 62% of the patients said that they had partial information to complete lack of information that would have made them aware of their diseases, its prognosis and the treatments options available to cure it, while only 32% of the patients agreed that they were supplied with thorough information during their interaction with the physicians.
Conclusion The majority of the patients were not wellinformed about their disease, its prognosis, treatment plan and continuity of care.
There was a significant positive correlation between the communication made at initial stages of hospital stay and during the end stages of stay of patient.
The main barrier to patient physician communication was time.
Key message To ensure patient safety, it is imperative to inform patients about all the important aspects starting from admission till discharge.
How to cite this article Sabherwal N, Mittal A, Pandey NK, Kaushal G, Kaustav P.
A Study of Patient-Physician Communication and Barriers in Communication.
Int J Res Foundation Hosp Healthc Adm 2015;3(2):71-78.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Comforting styles of serious illness conversations: a Swiss wide factorial survey study
Comforting styles of serious illness conversations: a Swiss wide factorial survey study
Abstract Background Serious illness conversations can cause discomfort in patients, potentially impeding their understanding and decision-making....
Medicare Physician Payment Systems: Impact of 2011 Schedule on Interventional Pain Management
Medicare Physician Payment Systems: Impact of 2011 Schedule on Interventional Pain Management
Physicians in the United States have been affected by significant changes in the patterns of medical practice evolving over the last several decades. The recently passed affordable...
About malpraxis, with love
About malpraxis, with love
The title of this article for the Romanian Journal of Military Medicine, is inspired from the title of an American movie from 1967, ''To Sir with love'', starring Sidney Poitier in...
LO55: A pilot evaluation of medical scribes in a Canadian emergency department
LO55: A pilot evaluation of medical scribes in a Canadian emergency department
Introduction: Improving emergency department productivity has been a priority across Canada. In the United States, medical scribes have been utilized to increase the number of pati...
Presentation and Management of Cervical Thoracic Duct Cyst: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Presentation and Management of Cervical Thoracic Duct Cyst: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Abstract Introduction Thoracic duct cysts are an uncommon phenomenon, especially within the cervical region. Due to its limited reported cases, very little is known about its etiol...
The Decline of Medicare Reimbursement in Clinical Pathology
The Decline of Medicare Reimbursement in Clinical Pathology
Abstract Introduction/Objective Access to clinical pathology services nationwide is threatened by the lack of an annual inflatio...

Back to Top