Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

P101 ‘Best Foot Forward Workshops’: a novel supported self-management approach for foot health

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Rheumatic foot health challenges can be multiple and wide-ranging, leading to reduced mobility or quality of life. However, the provision of foot health services is disparate. There is a need to innovate new approaches to personalised foot health care outside of traditional clinical models of service delivery. A new healthcare model was co-designed by patients, academics and clinicians from secondary and primary care Trusts, to support self-management. Part of this model included the development of ‘best foot forward’ workshops. There is a need to: minimise the impact of the demonstrated gap between what service users need or want and what services are providing; reduce waiting times; empower self-management; improve MDT availability for those in need; reduce the number of appointments needed to get resolution; reduce service costs; maintain patient satisfaction. Methods The team co-designed a series of foot health workshops, at 8-week intervals. The novel workshop design extended beyond a traditional patient education session and consisted of: 1. an education session about anatomy and physiology for the lower limb, 2. social networking time, 3. a themed education session, 4. opportunity for group discussion, 5. opportunity for individual question and answer with a health professional, 6. Access to direct request for follow-up appointment. Electronic invitations were sent to all patients registered within a single rheumatology department enrolled on the electronic notification system. Posters advertising the workshops were displayed in waiting areas. After three workshops data regarding patient attendance, satisfaction, and health service use up to four weeks after the workshop was collected. Results Nineteen, 22 and 30 patients attended the workshops respectively. Seven people attended multiple workshops. All patients reported having an unmet foot health need and would have otherwise sought a clinical appointment. Allowing for session preparation time (approx. 3 hours per session) 20 hours of clinical time was saved; the clinical waiting list was reduced by 12 sessions (6 weeks). Three patients (4%) requested one follow-up clinical appointment immediately after the workshop. No patients requested additional appointments in the four weeks after each workshop; enabling patient led review saved 71 further appointments. Patients reported content, venue and satisfactions scores of 9.6, 8.7 and 9.6/10 respectively. Conclusion Further research is needed to confirm that patients’ needs are being fully met, in addition to enabling supported self-management and improving clinical outcomes. There is potential for these workshops to be co-ordinated and facilitated by expert patient partners. The role of group interaction as a therapeutic mechanism to aid supported self-management is worthy of further study. Best foot forward workshops could represent a viable supported self-management alternative to traditional clinical models for people with rheumatic conditions. Disclosures S. Connett None. C. Beevor None. S. Ward None. E. Wong None. L. Cherry None.
Title: P101 ‘Best Foot Forward Workshops’: a novel supported self-management approach for foot health
Description:
Abstract Background Rheumatic foot health challenges can be multiple and wide-ranging, leading to reduced mobility or quality of life.
However, the provision of foot health services is disparate.
There is a need to innovate new approaches to personalised foot health care outside of traditional clinical models of service delivery.
A new healthcare model was co-designed by patients, academics and clinicians from secondary and primary care Trusts, to support self-management.
Part of this model included the development of ‘best foot forward’ workshops.
There is a need to: minimise the impact of the demonstrated gap between what service users need or want and what services are providing; reduce waiting times; empower self-management; improve MDT availability for those in need; reduce the number of appointments needed to get resolution; reduce service costs; maintain patient satisfaction.
Methods The team co-designed a series of foot health workshops, at 8-week intervals.
The novel workshop design extended beyond a traditional patient education session and consisted of: 1.
an education session about anatomy and physiology for the lower limb, 2.
social networking time, 3.
a themed education session, 4.
opportunity for group discussion, 5.
opportunity for individual question and answer with a health professional, 6.
Access to direct request for follow-up appointment.
Electronic invitations were sent to all patients registered within a single rheumatology department enrolled on the electronic notification system.
Posters advertising the workshops were displayed in waiting areas.
After three workshops data regarding patient attendance, satisfaction, and health service use up to four weeks after the workshop was collected.
Results Nineteen, 22 and 30 patients attended the workshops respectively.
Seven people attended multiple workshops.
All patients reported having an unmet foot health need and would have otherwise sought a clinical appointment.
Allowing for session preparation time (approx.
3 hours per session) 20 hours of clinical time was saved; the clinical waiting list was reduced by 12 sessions (6 weeks).
Three patients (4%) requested one follow-up clinical appointment immediately after the workshop.
No patients requested additional appointments in the four weeks after each workshop; enabling patient led review saved 71 further appointments.
Patients reported content, venue and satisfactions scores of 9.
6, 8.
7 and 9.
6/10 respectively.
Conclusion Further research is needed to confirm that patients’ needs are being fully met, in addition to enabling supported self-management and improving clinical outcomes.
There is potential for these workshops to be co-ordinated and facilitated by expert patient partners.
The role of group interaction as a therapeutic mechanism to aid supported self-management is worthy of further study.
Best foot forward workshops could represent a viable supported self-management alternative to traditional clinical models for people with rheumatic conditions.
Disclosures S.
Connett None.
C.
Beevor None.
S.
Ward None.
E.
Wong None.
L.
Cherry None.

Related Results

Where do you stand? An exploration of perspectives toward feet, foot health, and footwear using innovative digital methods
Where do you stand? An exploration of perspectives toward feet, foot health, and footwear using innovative digital methods
AbstractBackground The cost of losing foot health is significant to the person, healthcare systems, and economy, with diabetes related foot health issues alone costing over £1 bill...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below: RTD: Beyond Hospit...
Diabetic Foot in Qatar: A Primary Care Perspective
Diabetic Foot in Qatar: A Primary Care Perspective
Diabetic Foot in QatarA primary care Perspective Introduction Diabetes represents a major public health burden in developing countries, especially the Arabian Gulf region, which is...
Cavovarus Foot: Conservative Management Techniques/Case Studies
Cavovarus Foot: Conservative Management Techniques/Case Studies
Category: Other Introduction/Purpose: The cavovarus foot is a true challenge for both the patient and the surgeon. This complex deformity can be a result of many different causal f...
A STUDY TO EVALUATE SELF-FOOT CARE BEHAVIOUR IN INDIAN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS
A STUDY TO EVALUATE SELF-FOOT CARE BEHAVIOUR IN INDIAN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS
BACKGROUND:The benefits of self-foot care management are well recognized in type 2 diabetes subjects. However, a substantial proportion of patients don't perform self-foot care ass...
A STUDY TO EVALUATE SELF-FOOT CARE BEHAVIOUR IN INDIAN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS
A STUDY TO EVALUATE SELF-FOOT CARE BEHAVIOUR IN INDIAN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS
BACKGROUND:The benefits of self-foot care management are well recognized in type 2 diabetes subjects. However, a substantial proportion of patients don't perform self-foot care ass...
Muscle Strength and Foot Pressure Vary Depending on the Type of Foot Pain
Muscle Strength and Foot Pressure Vary Depending on the Type of Foot Pain
Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: Foot pain is highly prevalent at various ages and is especially common in middle-aged and older females. To the best of o...
The Automedial Zaniness of Ryan Trecartin
The Automedial Zaniness of Ryan Trecartin
IntroductionThe American artist Ryan Trecartin makes digital videos that centre on the self-presentations common to video-sharing sites such as YouTube. Named by New Yorker critic ...

Back to Top