Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Mexican Anthropology and Inter-American Knowledge
View through CrossRef
This essay contributes to a fuller understanding of the history and future of area studies by tracing Latin American studies back to the early twentieth century, when it took form within academic disciplines that sought to contribute to state policy-making. The essay focuses on a set of intellectual exchanges between the United States and Mexico around Native American affairs. In an era in which new inter-American scientific venues and the Good Neighbor policy attenuated the inevitable and ever present intellectual hierarchies that divided the United States from Mexico and the rest of Latin America, some scholars found resemblances and parallels between North and South America. These scholars envisioned a cosmopolitan Americanist intellectual sphere based on horizontal forms of sharing, and they looked for novel ways of reconciling the avowed need for generalization with the particulars that they confronted at home and abroad. They found themselves unable to fully escape epistemological binds that positioned the North as a model of modern nationhood and a locus of universal knowledge, and that relegated non-Western nations like Mexico to the category of the particular. They could not overcome the difficulties spawned by hierarchies among nations and, concomitantly, among their own scholarly communities.
Title: Mexican Anthropology and Inter-American Knowledge
Description:
This essay contributes to a fuller understanding of the history and future of area studies by tracing Latin American studies back to the early twentieth century, when it took form within academic disciplines that sought to contribute to state policy-making.
The essay focuses on a set of intellectual exchanges between the United States and Mexico around Native American affairs.
In an era in which new inter-American scientific venues and the Good Neighbor policy attenuated the inevitable and ever present intellectual hierarchies that divided the United States from Mexico and the rest of Latin America, some scholars found resemblances and parallels between North and South America.
These scholars envisioned a cosmopolitan Americanist intellectual sphere based on horizontal forms of sharing, and they looked for novel ways of reconciling the avowed need for generalization with the particulars that they confronted at home and abroad.
They found themselves unable to fully escape epistemological binds that positioned the North as a model of modern nationhood and a locus of universal knowledge, and that relegated non-Western nations like Mexico to the category of the particular.
They could not overcome the difficulties spawned by hierarchies among nations and, concomitantly, among their own scholarly communities.
Related Results
The Sad Story of Anthropology 1950-1999
The Sad Story of Anthropology 1950-1999
Within the social sciences, anthropology appears to have been more strongly affected by external political trends than its sister disciplines. The trends affecting anthropology app...
SAFETY’S SWAMP: AGAINST THE VALUE OF MODAL STABILITY
SAFETY’S SWAMP: AGAINST THE VALUE OF MODAL STABILITY
Abstract
An account of the nature of knowledge must explain the value of knowledge. This paper argues that modal conditions, such as safety and sensitivity, do not c...
Bad Lungs/Bad Air: Childhood Asthma and Ecosyndemics among Mexican Immigrant Farmworkers of California's San Joaquin Valley
Bad Lungs/Bad Air: Childhood Asthma and Ecosyndemics among Mexican Immigrant Farmworkers of California's San Joaquin Valley
California's San Joaquin Valley, one of the most highly productive—and contaminated—agricultural regions in the world, is beset by some of the nation's worst air quality and high r...
Book Reviews
Book Reviews
Book reviewed in this article:PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: Primatologia. Handbook of Primatology. H. HOFER, A. H. SCHULTZ, D. STARCKPHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: Volarhaut der Hände und Füsse. ...
Forum: The Dangers of the Field: The Researcher’s Perspective
Forum: The Dangers of the Field: The Researcher’s Perspective
This time, the “Forum” (a written round table) is dedicated to the topic of risks and dangers. In anthropology, discussions of danger in fieldwork are widespread, but the emphasis ...
Ancient cosmopolitanism: Feminism and the rethinking of Maya inter-regional interactions during the Late Classic to Postclassic periods (ca. 600–1521 CE)
Ancient cosmopolitanism: Feminism and the rethinking of Maya inter-regional interactions during the Late Classic to Postclassic periods (ca. 600–1521 CE)
The consideration of cosmopolitanism in archaeology provides a useful lens for thinking about and expanding how to conceive of inter-regional interactions and experiences of belong...
HENRI LE SAUX: NAS VEREDAS DO REAL
HENRI LE SAUX: NAS VEREDAS DO REAL
O objetivo do artigo é traçar o percurso dialogal de Henri le Saux (Abhishiktânanda), um dos grandes pioneiros do diálogo inter-religioso no século XX. Sua peregrinação no âmbito d...
Social Domains of Knowledge: Technology, Art, and Religion
Social Domains of Knowledge: Technology, Art, and Religion
This essay asks whether and how a Reformational epistemology should distinguish different types of knowledge within a unified conception of knowledge as a whole. I begin with the t...