Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Relational Ethics and Partiality

View through CrossRef
AbstractIn this article, I question the plausibility of Metz’s African moral theory from an oft neglected moral topic of partiality. Metz defends an Afro-communitarian moral theory that posits that the rightness of actions is entirely definable by relationships of identity and solidarity (or, friendship). I offer two objections to this relational moral theory. First, I argue that justifying partiality strictly by invoking relationships (of friendship) ultimately fails to properly value the individual for her own sake – this is called the ‘focus problem’ in the literature. Second, I argue that a relationship-based theory cannot accommodate the agent-related partiality since it posits some relationship to be morally fundamental. My critique ultimately reveals the inadequacy of a relationship-based moral theory insofar as it overlooks some crucial moral considerations grounded on the individual herself in her own right.
Berghahn Books
Title: Relational Ethics and Partiality
Description:
AbstractIn this article, I question the plausibility of Metz’s African moral theory from an oft neglected moral topic of partiality.
Metz defends an Afro-communitarian moral theory that posits that the rightness of actions is entirely definable by relationships of identity and solidarity (or, friendship).
I offer two objections to this relational moral theory.
First, I argue that justifying partiality strictly by invoking relationships (of friendship) ultimately fails to properly value the individual for her own sake – this is called the ‘focus problem’ in the literature.
Second, I argue that a relationship-based theory cannot accommodate the agent-related partiality since it posits some relationship to be morally fundamental.
My critique ultimately reveals the inadequacy of a relationship-based moral theory insofar as it overlooks some crucial moral considerations grounded on the individual herself in her own right.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Relational Practice: A Concept Analysis
Relational Practice: A Concept Analysis
Relational practice is increasingly being recognized as a core framework within contemporary nursing, shifting care away from task-focused routines and towards person-facilitated r...
Tlacoqualli in Monequi "The Center Good"
Tlacoqualli in Monequi "The Center Good"
Photo by Andrew James on Unsplash INTRODUCTION Since its inception, bioethics has focused on Western conceptions of ethics and science. This has provided a strong foundation to bui...
A Critique of Principlism
A Critique of Principlism
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash INTRODUCTION Bioethics does not have an explicitly stated and agreed upon means of resolving conflicts between normative theories. As such, b...
Ranking Accounting Scholars Publishing Ethics Research in Accounting and Business Ethics Journals
Ranking Accounting Scholars Publishing Ethics Research in Accounting and Business Ethics Journals
Abstract This research provides accounting-ethics authors and administrators with a benchmark for accounting-ethics research. While Bernardi and Bean (2010) consi...
Global Ethic of Care
Global Ethic of Care
The “ethics of care” is an approach to morality that focuses on the moral salience of responsibilities to particular, concrete others and the relationships and connections from whi...
Clarifying relational egalitarianism
Clarifying relational egalitarianism
[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] I clarify the nature of relational egalitarianism, a theory in political philosophy that concerns equality. R...

Back to Top