Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Incidental Cholecystectomy during Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery

View through CrossRef
Cholelithiasis and gastroesophageal reflux are both very common diseases that may occur simultaneously. Management of asymptomatic gallstones is still controversial. Because severe complications due to gallstones may occur incidental cholecystectomy during nonrelated abdominal surgery may be offered to patients with coexisting gallbladder disease. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of patients after laparoscopic fundoplication and incidental cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis compared with the outcome of patients after fundoplication alone. We conducted a retrospective chart review and prospective analysis using a questionnaire of the clinical outcome of patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication and incidental cholecystectomy from June 1991 to January 2000 in comparison with sex- and age-matched patients who had antireflux surgery alone. Sixty-seven (6.3%) of 1065 patients had a laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the time of laparoscopic antireflux surgery; 101 (75%) of 134 answered the questionnaire. The mean follow-up time was 4.6 years. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy did not influence surgical morbidity or mortality. Postoperative symptom score (1–10) did not show a statistically significant difference regarding bloating, diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, biliary problems, jaundice, pancreatitis, dysphagia for liquids and solid, heartburn, regurgitation, and chest pain when the two groups were compared. We conclude that incidental cholecystectomy during laparoscopic antireflux surgery is safe and does not appear to influence the clinical outcome of the antireflux procedure.
Title: Incidental Cholecystectomy during Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery
Description:
Cholelithiasis and gastroesophageal reflux are both very common diseases that may occur simultaneously.
Management of asymptomatic gallstones is still controversial.
Because severe complications due to gallstones may occur incidental cholecystectomy during nonrelated abdominal surgery may be offered to patients with coexisting gallbladder disease.
The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of patients after laparoscopic fundoplication and incidental cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis compared with the outcome of patients after fundoplication alone.
We conducted a retrospective chart review and prospective analysis using a questionnaire of the clinical outcome of patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication and incidental cholecystectomy from June 1991 to January 2000 in comparison with sex- and age-matched patients who had antireflux surgery alone.
Sixty-seven (6.
3%) of 1065 patients had a laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the time of laparoscopic antireflux surgery; 101 (75%) of 134 answered the questionnaire.
The mean follow-up time was 4.
6 years.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy did not influence surgical morbidity or mortality.
Postoperative symptom score (1–10) did not show a statistically significant difference regarding bloating, diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, biliary problems, jaundice, pancreatitis, dysphagia for liquids and solid, heartburn, regurgitation, and chest pain when the two groups were compared.
We conclude that incidental cholecystectomy during laparoscopic antireflux surgery is safe and does not appear to influence the clinical outcome of the antireflux procedure.

Related Results

AI and Incidental Findings
AI and Incidental Findings
Photo by Accuray on Unsplash INTRODUCTION Delayed and missed follow-up on incidental findings threatens patient health and is a major financial risk for healthcare systems. The hea...
A <span aria-describedby="tippy-18">Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
A <span aria-describedby="tippy-18">Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery robot-assisted surgical system has gained significant popularity over open and laparoscopic interventions. However, given its high c...
Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common duct stones
Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common duct stones
Background:  The purpose of the present study was to examine the current approach and different strategies adopted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Germany.Methods:  A retrospec...
Prevalence of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury Following Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Treatment Outcomes
Prevalence of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury Following Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Treatment Outcomes
Background and Aim:Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (IBDI) continue to be a difficult diagnostic and therapeutic problem. The prevalence of iatrogenic IBDI increased with the laparosc...
Comparison of Postoperative Complications Early Vs Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
Comparison of Postoperative Complications Early Vs Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
Background: Acute cholecystitis, which is typically associated with gallstones, is one of the most common causes of acute abdomen presenting in emergency departments around the wor...
Three Port versus Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study
Three Port versus Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study
Objective: To compare the complications among patients undergoing three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Comparative ...

Back to Top