Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

General group exercise in low back pain management in a military population, a comparison with specific spine group exercise: a service evaluation

View through CrossRef
Objective To investigate whether general group exercise (GGE) offers the same outcomes compared with a specific spinal group exercise (SSGE) for chronic low back pain (CLBP) in a military population. Design Retrospective service evaluation using routine service activity data. Setting A UK military rehabilitation centre. Participants A total of 106 patients with CLBP. Interventions Three-week intensive (5 days per week, 15-day intervention) rehabilitation course for patients with CLBP. Six SSGE groups (n=64); CLBP only. Six GGE groups (n=42); CLBP patients grouped with chronic lower limb (LL) injuries. Outcome measures Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numerical Pain-Rating Scores and the Modified Multi-Stage Fitness Test (Mod-MSFT). Long-term effects were measured by Medical Employment Standard (MES) status and physiotherapy follow-up at 3 and 12 months. Results A between-group analysis showed no significant difference in GGE compared with SSGE. Mean changes (SD) in pain were −2.71±2.35 and −1.20±1.99 (p=0.018), ODI were −3.6±5.7 and −4±8.5 respectively (p=0.649) and Mod-MSFT 28.4±30.8 and 29.7±31.7 respectively (p=0.792). At 3 months, a greater proportion of the GGE were having ongoing physiotherapy; GGE=50%, SSGE=30.2%, (p=0.016) although some differences were evident across MES with 32.5 % of GGE compared with 20.6 % of SSGE being medically fit with no restrictions. At 12 months, groups were largely comparable for follow-up physiotherapy and MES; 22.5% of GGE and 20.6% of SSGE continued to have physiotherapy input; 47.5% of GGE and 50.8% of SSGE were medically fit with no restrictions. Conclusion Patients with CLBP who completed a 3-week rehabilitation programme had comparable outcomes when grouped with patients with LL, although only improvements in pain in the GGE group achieved a meaningful change. Further evaluation of potential costs and savings to service costs is now required.
Title: General group exercise in low back pain management in a military population, a comparison with specific spine group exercise: a service evaluation
Description:
Objective To investigate whether general group exercise (GGE) offers the same outcomes compared with a specific spinal group exercise (SSGE) for chronic low back pain (CLBP) in a military population.
Design Retrospective service evaluation using routine service activity data.
Setting A UK military rehabilitation centre.
Participants A total of 106 patients with CLBP.
Interventions Three-week intensive (5 days per week, 15-day intervention) rehabilitation course for patients with CLBP.
Six SSGE groups (n=64); CLBP only.
Six GGE groups (n=42); CLBP patients grouped with chronic lower limb (LL) injuries.
Outcome measures Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numerical Pain-Rating Scores and the Modified Multi-Stage Fitness Test (Mod-MSFT).
Long-term effects were measured by Medical Employment Standard (MES) status and physiotherapy follow-up at 3 and 12 months.
Results A between-group analysis showed no significant difference in GGE compared with SSGE.
Mean changes (SD) in pain were −2.
71±2.
35 and −1.
20±1.
99 (p=0.
018), ODI were −3.
6±5.
7 and −4±8.
5 respectively (p=0.
649) and Mod-MSFT 28.
4±30.
8 and 29.
7±31.
7 respectively (p=0.
792).
At 3 months, a greater proportion of the GGE were having ongoing physiotherapy; GGE=50%, SSGE=30.
2%, (p=0.
016) although some differences were evident across MES with 32.
5 % of GGE compared with 20.
6 % of SSGE being medically fit with no restrictions.
At 12 months, groups were largely comparable for follow-up physiotherapy and MES; 22.
5% of GGE and 20.
6% of SSGE continued to have physiotherapy input; 47.
5% of GGE and 50.
8% of SSGE were medically fit with no restrictions.
Conclusion Patients with CLBP who completed a 3-week rehabilitation programme had comparable outcomes when grouped with patients with LL, although only improvements in pain in the GGE group achieved a meaningful change.
Further evaluation of potential costs and savings to service costs is now required.

Related Results

Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...
Studi Komparatif Efektivitas Mckenzie Exercises dan William Flexion Exercises pada Myogenic Low Back Pain
Studi Komparatif Efektivitas Mckenzie Exercises dan William Flexion Exercises pada Myogenic Low Back Pain
McKenzie and William Flexion exercises are physiotherapeutic interventions for LBPM (Low Back Myogenic Pain) to reduce pain and improve functional activity. This study aims to comp...
Pain Catastrophizing and Impact on Pelvic Floor Surgery Experience
Pain Catastrophizing and Impact on Pelvic Floor Surgery Experience
ABSTRACT Duration, intensity, and management of pain and discomfort may all be affected by experience, personality, and medical and psychosocial comorbidities. A negative...
Evaluation of Primary Care Physician Chronic Pain Management Practice Patterns
Evaluation of Primary Care Physician Chronic Pain Management Practice Patterns
Background: The management of chronic pain is complex and often involves the integration of multiple clinical, humanistic, and economic factors. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are ...
The Role of the Spine in Posture and Movement
The Role of the Spine in Posture and Movement
Spine is one of the most vital parts of human body, plays an integral role in movement, posture and overall well-being. It works as a central axis for human skeleton, supporting th...

Back to Top