Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Effect of Calcium Channel Blockers versus Diuretics for Hypertension
View through CrossRef
Background. Although calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are recognized as clinical first‐line agents for the treatment of hypertension, their use in combination with diuretics in cardiovascular disease caused by hypertension remains controversial. Methods. We searched the three major databases of the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed for the terms “calcium channel blockers,” “thiazide diuretics,” “loop diuretics,” and “hypertension,” “randomized controlled trials” and “meta‐analysis trials.” These terms were searched from January 1991 to October 2021. Results. For the primary outcome, in 5 studies including 35,057 patients, there was no statistically significant difference in all‐cause mortality with calcium channel blockers compared with diuretics (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.92–1.04, I2 = 0). In four studies including 33,643 patients with major cardiovascular events, there was no statistically significant difference in major cardiovascular events with calcium channel blockers compared with diuretics (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 1.04–1.09, I2 = 0). Conclusion. There is no statistically significant difference between calcium channel blockers and diuretics in terms of cardiovascular clinical prognosis in hypertensive patients, but there are positive implications for clinical guidance, which need to be fully validated in new large randomized controlled trials.
Title: Effect of Calcium Channel Blockers versus Diuretics for Hypertension
Description:
Background.
Although calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are recognized as clinical first‐line agents for the treatment of hypertension, their use in combination with diuretics in cardiovascular disease caused by hypertension remains controversial.
Methods.
We searched the three major databases of the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed for the terms “calcium channel blockers,” “thiazide diuretics,” “loop diuretics,” and “hypertension,” “randomized controlled trials” and “meta‐analysis trials.
” These terms were searched from January 1991 to October 2021.
Results.
For the primary outcome, in 5 studies including 35,057 patients, there was no statistically significant difference in all‐cause mortality with calcium channel blockers compared with diuretics (RR = 0.
98, 95% CI 0.
92–1.
04, I2 = 0).
In four studies including 33,643 patients with major cardiovascular events, there was no statistically significant difference in major cardiovascular events with calcium channel blockers compared with diuretics (RR = 1.
00, 95% CI 1.
04–1.
09, I2 = 0).
Conclusion.
There is no statistically significant difference between calcium channel blockers and diuretics in terms of cardiovascular clinical prognosis in hypertensive patients, but there are positive implications for clinical guidance, which need to be fully validated in new large randomized controlled trials.
Related Results
British Food Journal Volume 45 Issue 9 1943
British Food Journal Volume 45 Issue 9 1943
I now pass on to an aspect of calcium metabolism which is more topical, but probably more controversial. I refer to the incidence of calcium deficiency. By what means can we determ...
Medical Management of Pulmonary Hypertension: Calcium Channel Blockers Vs Sildenafil A Systematic Review
Medical Management of Pulmonary Hypertension: Calcium Channel Blockers Vs Sildenafil A Systematic Review
Background: Pulmonary hypertension can be defined as incompatibility in blood pressure level into vessels and right side of heart is affected severely through this. As a result, he...
Review on Diuretics: Used in the management of Hypertension
Review on Diuretics: Used in the management of Hypertension
Hypertension, a significant global health issue, is
particularly prevalent in low- and middle-income
countries, such as India, where it affects
approximately 25-30% of the populati...
QUALITY OF TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION IN COMBATANTS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE PRESENT COMORBID PATHOLOGY
QUALITY OF TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION IN COMBATANTS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE PRESENT COMORBID PATHOLOGY
Objective:
Assessment of compliance of treatment of arterial hypertension (AH) in participants of modern armed conflicts with the requirements of evidence-based medicin...
The Calcium Channel Blocker Controversy in Perspective
The Calcium Channel Blocker Controversy in Perspective
Periodically in the history of hypertensive therapy there have been minor storms that have significantly affected the utilization of entire classes of agents. The first storm struc...
GW24-e3137 The etiology investigate of hypertension incidence in children
GW24-e3137 The etiology investigate of hypertension incidence in children
Objectives
Through retrospective analysis of related factors of children’s hypertension what is composed by primary hypertension and secondary hypertension diseas...
En skvatmølle i Ljørring
En skvatmølle i Ljørring
A Horizontal Mill at Ljørring, Jutland.Horizontal water-mills have been in use in Jutland since the beginning of the Christian era 2). But the one here described shows so close a c...
#1250 Measurement of ionized calcium with a point-of-care ionometer during treatment with etelcalcetide
#1250 Measurement of ionized calcium with a point-of-care ionometer during treatment with etelcalcetide
Abstract
Background and Aims
Etelcalcetide is an intravenous calcimimetic indicated for the treatment of mineral and bone disord...

