Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Characterizing Site Geologic Conditions for Quantitative Hazard Analyses
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This paper describes a methodology for characterizing geologic features to support quantitative project risk assessment and decision modeling. The methodology contains the basic elements of a geohazard characterization to develop input for a probabilistic analysis of hazard (see companion paper by Hanson et al., OTC paper number 17675). We are suggesting this approach is also appropriate for supporting deterministic hazard analysis. It has the advantage of being able to withstand the close scrutiny of technical experts, and can provide the hazard results in a format that expresses the qualities of uncertainty and likelihood, both of which are fundamental components of decision modeling and risk assessment.
Introduction
Marine engineering projects, particularly in the deepwater environment can face severe technical challenges to design, construct and operate safe and reliable systems. The challenges are being met by expanding the application of existing technology and by innovation and proving of new designs. The result is often a complex system installed at great cost that must operate reliably for decades in a potentially hostile natural environment. Geohazards are geological processes that have the potential to adversely affect the planned facilities. The deepwater marine environment is a particularly geohazardous place, and he contribution of geohazard to overall project risk has increased as a result.
The investigation and characterization of site geological conditions in the marine environment has undergone rapid growth in response to these increasing demands. The application of 3D seismic data, AUV technology, and deepwater geotechnical borings are examples of the new generation of site investigation tools that are now being used routinely, and in many cases required, for deepwater site characterization. Theze tools are capable of obtaining high resolution and very high resolution information that can be used to quantify the geohazard potential of a site or region. At the same time, there have been rapid changes in the decision-making process for both technical and economic issues associated with these projects prompted by the increasingly complex nature of the technical and managerial systems and the greater risk/reward factor.
This paper describes a site investigation methodology for geohazard analysis that is well-suited to take advantage of the new site investigation techniques, and also can provide the content and format most useful to project risk assessment and decision modeling.
The aims of a hazard analysis are to develop information regarding the "where", "how big" and "when" for any event that could potentially impact project safety. In a geohazard assessment the geologic characteristics that determine the level of hazard are:the location of a hazard feature;the potential magnitude of a hazard event; andthe rate of occurrence (recurrence) of hazard events.
The location of hazard features is represented on maps, magnitude is typically expressed either on maps or as values in table format and rate of occurrences are as values based on past events in table format, and/or an areal extent in map view.
Title: Characterizing Site Geologic Conditions for Quantitative Hazard Analyses
Description:
Abstract
This paper describes a methodology for characterizing geologic features to support quantitative project risk assessment and decision modeling.
The methodology contains the basic elements of a geohazard characterization to develop input for a probabilistic analysis of hazard (see companion paper by Hanson et al.
, OTC paper number 17675).
We are suggesting this approach is also appropriate for supporting deterministic hazard analysis.
It has the advantage of being able to withstand the close scrutiny of technical experts, and can provide the hazard results in a format that expresses the qualities of uncertainty and likelihood, both of which are fundamental components of decision modeling and risk assessment.
Introduction
Marine engineering projects, particularly in the deepwater environment can face severe technical challenges to design, construct and operate safe and reliable systems.
The challenges are being met by expanding the application of existing technology and by innovation and proving of new designs.
The result is often a complex system installed at great cost that must operate reliably for decades in a potentially hostile natural environment.
Geohazards are geological processes that have the potential to adversely affect the planned facilities.
The deepwater marine environment is a particularly geohazardous place, and he contribution of geohazard to overall project risk has increased as a result.
The investigation and characterization of site geological conditions in the marine environment has undergone rapid growth in response to these increasing demands.
The application of 3D seismic data, AUV technology, and deepwater geotechnical borings are examples of the new generation of site investigation tools that are now being used routinely, and in many cases required, for deepwater site characterization.
Theze tools are capable of obtaining high resolution and very high resolution information that can be used to quantify the geohazard potential of a site or region.
At the same time, there have been rapid changes in the decision-making process for both technical and economic issues associated with these projects prompted by the increasingly complex nature of the technical and managerial systems and the greater risk/reward factor.
This paper describes a site investigation methodology for geohazard analysis that is well-suited to take advantage of the new site investigation techniques, and also can provide the content and format most useful to project risk assessment and decision modeling.
The aims of a hazard analysis are to develop information regarding the "where", "how big" and "when" for any event that could potentially impact project safety.
In a geohazard assessment the geologic characteristics that determine the level of hazard are:the location of a hazard feature;the potential magnitude of a hazard event; andthe rate of occurrence (recurrence) of hazard events.
The location of hazard features is represented on maps, magnitude is typically expressed either on maps or as values in table format and rate of occurrences are as values based on past events in table format, and/or an areal extent in map view.
Related Results
Geologic Modeling And Visualization Facilitates The Transition From Exploration To Development
Geologic Modeling And Visualization Facilitates The Transition From Exploration To Development
Abstract
The development of interactive modeling tools and better integration of seismic and geology allow 3D geologic modeling to play a significant, new role in...
DDE-TS: A semantic service for geologic time
DDE-TS: A semantic service for geologic time
Age is an important property in geologic data. It can tell us when a geologic event happened, how long did the event last. And it is important to know the sequence of events to con...
Spatial Database of 1: 2500000 Digital Geologic Map of People's Republic of China
Spatial Database of 1: 2500000 Digital Geologic Map of People's Republic of China
The People's Republic of China 1:2500000 digital geologic map space database was completed in 2001, after a two-year project. In addition to the main database, the database is comp...
Random proportional Weibull hazard model for large‐scale information systems
Random proportional Weibull hazard model for large‐scale information systems
PurposeThis study aims to focus on asset management of large‐scale information systems supporting infrastructures and especially seeks to address a methodology of their statistical...
Hazard perception in driving style based on virtual reality technology
Hazard perception in driving style based on virtual reality technology
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to directly investigate the influence of driving style on hazards and to test the hazard perception of drivers with driving style variabil...
Composite endpoints in clinical trials : computational tools, practical guidelines and methodological extensions
Composite endpoints in clinical trials : computational tools, practical guidelines and methodological extensions
The conclusions from randomized clinical trials (RCT) rely on the primary endpoint (PE), which is chosen at the design stage of the study; thus, it is of utmost importance to selec...
"Menganalisis Perbandingan Kurva Hazard Menggunakan Fungsi Atenuasi"
"Menganalisis Perbandingan Kurva Hazard Menggunakan Fungsi Atenuasi"
Papua merupakan daerah rawan gempa di Indonesia karena letaknya berada di jalur tektonik aktif sehingga menyebabkan daerah papua rawan terjadinya gempa. Upaya peningkatan mitigasi ...
Reducing Subjectivity in Landslide Hazard Zonation Method: An Integrated Methodology
Reducing Subjectivity in Landslide Hazard Zonation Method: An Integrated Methodology
Abstract
This study was conducted in Sheko District, Southwestern Ethiopia. The area has been experiencing recurrent landslide problems for several years. Due to the severi...

