Treatment-Related Adverse Events in Individuals with BRAF-Mutant Cutaneous Melanoma Treated with BRAF and MEK Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials and case reports analyzing the safety of the currently approved BRAF and MEK inhibitors in adults with cutaneous melanoma (CM), and a meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Methods: We systematically searched six databases for studies published since 2009. The TRAE absolute frequencies reported in primary studies were aggregated using the Metaprop command in Stata 17, which calculates 95% confidence intervals (CIs) incorporating the Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation of proportions to stabilize variances within random-effect models. Methodological quality was assessed using the RoB 2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. Results: Twelve RCTs, thirteen prospective cohort studies (PCSs), and ten case reports were included. Meta-analysis was feasible for two regimens: vemurafenib 960 mg monotherapy and dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib 1–2 mg daily. The most common TRAEs during vemurafenib treatment were musculoskeletal and connective-tissue disorders (24%, 95% CI: 6–41%, p = 0.01), with arthralgia as the most prevalent (44%, 95% CI: 29–59%, p < 0.001), followed by rash (39%, 95% CI: 22–56%, p < 0.001). The most common TRAEs during dabrafenib plus trametinib were constitutional toxicities (classified in CTCAE as ‘General disorders and administration site conditions’; 25%, 95% CI: 14–37%, p < 0.001), with fatigue as the most prevalent (47%, 95% CI: 38–56%, p < 0.001), followed by pyrexia (40%, 95% CI: 26–54%, p < 0.001). Squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthoma were among the most frequent grade ≥ 3 cutaneous adverse events observed with vemurafenib therapy. Conclusions: Although additional large-scale studies are needed to corroborate these findings, each treatment has a distinct toxicity profile that should be considered when developing personalized risk-stratified treatment plans and in guiding healthcare resource allocation in melanoma care.