Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Influence of resident involvement on fluoroscopy time and ionizing radiation exposure in fluoroscopy‐guided spinal procedures

View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundFluoroscopic guidance has become the standard for a variety of medical procedures. Mastering these techniques requires practice, which may entail additional radiation for patients and providers. Despite their widespread use, the literature examining factors influencing radiation exposure in fluoroscopically guided pain procedures is scarce.ObjectiveTo evaluate the influence of resident involvement on radiation exposure during fluoroscopy‐guided spinal interventions.DesignSingle‐center, observational study.SettingOutpatient physiatry clinic in a teaching hospital.PatientsAll patients who received cervical or lumbar facet block(s) (FBs), transforaminal epidural steroid injection(s) (TFESIs) without digital subtraction, or a caudal epidural (CE) during the study period were included.InterventionsResident involvement in the procedures: absent, observing, or participating.Main Outcome MeasuresMachine‐indicated fluoroscopy time (seconds) and radiation dose (milligrays [mGy]).ResultsTwo hundred ninety six procedures were included: 188 FBs (58 cervical, 130 lumbar), 48 CEs, and 60 TFESIs. For lumbar FBs, fluoroscopy time and radiation dose increased significantly when residents performed them (meantime = 24.5 s, confidence interval [CI] = 20.4–28.7; meandose = 3.53 mGy, CI = 2.57–4.49) compared to when they observed (meantime = 9.9 s, CI = 8.1–11.7; meandose = 1.28 mGy, CI = 0.98–1.59) (mean difference: time = 14.63 s, CI = 9.31–19.94; dose = 2.25 mGy, CI = 1.17–3.33) and were absent during the procedure (meantime = 12.9 s, CI = 11.1–14.6; meandose = 1.65 mGy, CI = 1.40–1.89) (mean difference: time = 11.67 s, CI = 7.35–15.98; dose = 1.88 mGy, CI = 1.01–2.76). In the case of TFESIs, time, but not dose, increased significantly when residents observed (meantime = 39.1 s, CI = 30.7–47.6; meandose = 6.73 mGy, CI = 3.39–10.07) compared to when they were absent (meantime = 27.1 s, CI = 22.4–31.8; meandose = 4.41 mGy, CI = 3.06–5.76 (mean difference: time = 11.99 s, CI = 1.37–22.61; dose = 2.32 mGy, CI = −1.20–5.84). Finally, resident involvement did not significantly affect the outcomes for CEs (ptime = .032, pdose = .74) and cervical FBs (ptime = .64, pdose = .68).ConclusionResident participation affected lumbar FBs the most, with an increase in both fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.
Title: Influence of resident involvement on fluoroscopy time and ionizing radiation exposure in fluoroscopy‐guided spinal procedures
Description:
AbstractBackgroundFluoroscopic guidance has become the standard for a variety of medical procedures.
Mastering these techniques requires practice, which may entail additional radiation for patients and providers.
Despite their widespread use, the literature examining factors influencing radiation exposure in fluoroscopically guided pain procedures is scarce.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the influence of resident involvement on radiation exposure during fluoroscopy‐guided spinal interventions.
DesignSingle‐center, observational study.
SettingOutpatient physiatry clinic in a teaching hospital.
PatientsAll patients who received cervical or lumbar facet block(s) (FBs), transforaminal epidural steroid injection(s) (TFESIs) without digital subtraction, or a caudal epidural (CE) during the study period were included.
InterventionsResident involvement in the procedures: absent, observing, or participating.
Main Outcome MeasuresMachine‐indicated fluoroscopy time (seconds) and radiation dose (milligrays [mGy]).
ResultsTwo hundred ninety six procedures were included: 188 FBs (58 cervical, 130 lumbar), 48 CEs, and 60 TFESIs.
For lumbar FBs, fluoroscopy time and radiation dose increased significantly when residents performed them (meantime = 24.
5 s, confidence interval [CI] = 20.
4–28.
7; meandose = 3.
53 mGy, CI = 2.
57–4.
49) compared to when they observed (meantime = 9.
9 s, CI = 8.
1–11.
7; meandose = 1.
28 mGy, CI = 0.
98–1.
59) (mean difference: time = 14.
63 s, CI = 9.
31–19.
94; dose = 2.
25 mGy, CI = 1.
17–3.
33) and were absent during the procedure (meantime = 12.
9 s, CI = 11.
1–14.
6; meandose = 1.
65 mGy, CI = 1.
40–1.
89) (mean difference: time = 11.
67 s, CI = 7.
35–15.
98; dose = 1.
88 mGy, CI = 1.
01–2.
76).
In the case of TFESIs, time, but not dose, increased significantly when residents observed (meantime = 39.
1 s, CI = 30.
7–47.
6; meandose = 6.
73 mGy, CI = 3.
39–10.
07) compared to when they were absent (meantime = 27.
1 s, CI = 22.
4–31.
8; meandose = 4.
41 mGy, CI = 3.
06–5.
76 (mean difference: time = 11.
99 s, CI = 1.
37–22.
61; dose = 2.
32 mGy, CI = −1.
20–5.
84).
Finally, resident involvement did not significantly affect the outcomes for CEs (ptime = .
032, pdose = .
74) and cervical FBs (ptime = .
64, pdose = .
68).
ConclusionResident participation affected lumbar FBs the most, with an increase in both fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.

Related Results

Hidden Radiation Exposure: Daily Life vs Medical Imaging
Hidden Radiation Exposure: Daily Life vs Medical Imaging
Radiation is a natural and unavoidable part of human life, present in the environment as well as in medical imaging procedures. While many people fear radiation from diagnostic ima...
Effect of ionizing radiation towards human health: A review
Effect of ionizing radiation towards human health: A review
Abstract This paper reviews the properties, process and effect of ionizing radiation towards human health. The fetus and human embryo are much sensitive to ionizing ...
“A Prospective Study On Complication During Spinal Anesthesia In Elective General Surgical Procedures”
“A Prospective Study On Complication During Spinal Anesthesia In Elective General Surgical Procedures”
Background of the Study: Spinal anesthesia is one of the most commonly employed regional anesthetic techniques for elective surgical procedures involving the lower abdomen, pelvis,...
Comparison of Ultrasound‐Guided to Fluoroscopy‐Guided Biceps Tendon Sheath Therapeutic Injection
Comparison of Ultrasound‐Guided to Fluoroscopy‐Guided Biceps Tendon Sheath Therapeutic Injection
ObjectivesBiceps tendinitis is a source of anterior shoulder pain and is amenable to therapeutic injection. Studies have shown greater accuracy with image‐guided compared to unguid...

Back to Top