Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Influence of resident involvement on fluoroscopy time and ionizing radiation exposure in fluoroscopy‐guided spinal procedures

View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundFluoroscopic guidance has become the standard for a variety of medical procedures. Mastering these techniques requires practice, which may entail additional radiation for patients and providers. Despite their widespread use, the literature examining factors influencing radiation exposure in fluoroscopically guided pain procedures is scarce.ObjectiveTo evaluate the influence of resident involvement on radiation exposure during fluoroscopy‐guided spinal interventions.DesignSingle‐center, observational study.SettingOutpatient physiatry clinic in a teaching hospital.PatientsAll patients who received cervical or lumbar facet block(s) (FBs), transforaminal epidural steroid injection(s) (TFESIs) without digital subtraction, or a caudal epidural (CE) during the study period were included.InterventionsResident involvement in the procedures: absent, observing, or participating.Main Outcome MeasuresMachine‐indicated fluoroscopy time (seconds) and radiation dose (milligrays [mGy]).ResultsTwo hundred ninety six procedures were included: 188 FBs (58 cervical, 130 lumbar), 48 CEs, and 60 TFESIs. For lumbar FBs, fluoroscopy time and radiation dose increased significantly when residents performed them (meantime = 24.5 s, confidence interval [CI] = 20.4–28.7; meandose = 3.53 mGy, CI = 2.57–4.49) compared to when they observed (meantime = 9.9 s, CI = 8.1–11.7; meandose = 1.28 mGy, CI = 0.98–1.59) (mean difference: time = 14.63 s, CI = 9.31–19.94; dose = 2.25 mGy, CI = 1.17–3.33) and were absent during the procedure (meantime = 12.9 s, CI = 11.1–14.6; meandose = 1.65 mGy, CI = 1.40–1.89) (mean difference: time = 11.67 s, CI = 7.35–15.98; dose = 1.88 mGy, CI = 1.01–2.76). In the case of TFESIs, time, but not dose, increased significantly when residents observed (meantime = 39.1 s, CI = 30.7–47.6; meandose = 6.73 mGy, CI = 3.39–10.07) compared to when they were absent (meantime = 27.1 s, CI = 22.4–31.8; meandose = 4.41 mGy, CI = 3.06–5.76 (mean difference: time = 11.99 s, CI = 1.37–22.61; dose = 2.32 mGy, CI = −1.20–5.84). Finally, resident involvement did not significantly affect the outcomes for CEs (ptime = .032, pdose = .74) and cervical FBs (ptime = .64, pdose = .68).ConclusionResident participation affected lumbar FBs the most, with an increase in both fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.
Title: Influence of resident involvement on fluoroscopy time and ionizing radiation exposure in fluoroscopy‐guided spinal procedures
Description:
AbstractBackgroundFluoroscopic guidance has become the standard for a variety of medical procedures.
Mastering these techniques requires practice, which may entail additional radiation for patients and providers.
Despite their widespread use, the literature examining factors influencing radiation exposure in fluoroscopically guided pain procedures is scarce.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the influence of resident involvement on radiation exposure during fluoroscopy‐guided spinal interventions.
DesignSingle‐center, observational study.
SettingOutpatient physiatry clinic in a teaching hospital.
PatientsAll patients who received cervical or lumbar facet block(s) (FBs), transforaminal epidural steroid injection(s) (TFESIs) without digital subtraction, or a caudal epidural (CE) during the study period were included.
InterventionsResident involvement in the procedures: absent, observing, or participating.
Main Outcome MeasuresMachine‐indicated fluoroscopy time (seconds) and radiation dose (milligrays [mGy]).
ResultsTwo hundred ninety six procedures were included: 188 FBs (58 cervical, 130 lumbar), 48 CEs, and 60 TFESIs.
For lumbar FBs, fluoroscopy time and radiation dose increased significantly when residents performed them (meantime = 24.
5 s, confidence interval [CI] = 20.
4–28.
7; meandose = 3.
53 mGy, CI = 2.
57–4.
49) compared to when they observed (meantime = 9.
9 s, CI = 8.
1–11.
7; meandose = 1.
28 mGy, CI = 0.
98–1.
59) (mean difference: time = 14.
63 s, CI = 9.
31–19.
94; dose = 2.
25 mGy, CI = 1.
17–3.
33) and were absent during the procedure (meantime = 12.
9 s, CI = 11.
1–14.
6; meandose = 1.
65 mGy, CI = 1.
40–1.
89) (mean difference: time = 11.
67 s, CI = 7.
35–15.
98; dose = 1.
88 mGy, CI = 1.
01–2.
76).
In the case of TFESIs, time, but not dose, increased significantly when residents observed (meantime = 39.
1 s, CI = 30.
7–47.
6; meandose = 6.
73 mGy, CI = 3.
39–10.
07) compared to when they were absent (meantime = 27.
1 s, CI = 22.
4–31.
8; meandose = 4.
41 mGy, CI = 3.
06–5.
76 (mean difference: time = 11.
99 s, CI = 1.
37–22.
61; dose = 2.
32 mGy, CI = −1.
20–5.
84).
Finally, resident involvement did not significantly affect the outcomes for CEs (ptime = .
032, pdose = .
74) and cervical FBs (ptime = .
64, pdose = .
68).
ConclusionResident participation affected lumbar FBs the most, with an increase in both fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.

Related Results

Quantification of Radiation Exposure in Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Residents
Quantification of Radiation Exposure in Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Residents
Introduction: Natural radiation exposure in the general population averages 3 milliSieverts (mSv) annually; however, radiation exposure in orthopaedic residents is not ...
CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA COURSE IN PERSONS EXPOSED TO IONIZING RADIATION AS A RESULT OF THE CHORNOBYL ACCIDENT
CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA COURSE IN PERSONS EXPOSED TO IONIZING RADIATION AS A RESULT OF THE CHORNOBYL ACCIDENT
Objective. Describe and characterize the peculiarities of the chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) course and response to treatment in patients irradiated as a result of the Chornobyl nu...
Attitudes and practices of orthopedic surgeons when using fluoroscopy in the operating room
Attitudes and practices of orthopedic surgeons when using fluoroscopy in the operating room
Introduction: The aim of this study is to assess the practices and knowledge levels of Moroccan orthopedic surgeons on the possible uses and risks of fluoroscopy and to evaluate me...
Secret of radiation protection and anti-static clothing
Secret of radiation protection and anti-static clothing
In the current era, electromagnetic radiation is everywhere. Every day electromagnetic radiation and static electricity caused by a variety of hazards. So, anti-electromagnetic rad...
Effects of resveratrol against scattered radiation-induced testicular damage in rats
Effects of resveratrol against scattered radiation-induced testicular damage in rats
Abstract Objectives To investigate the possible protective effects of resveratrol against oxidative testicular damage due to sca...

Back to Top