Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Donatus and Donatism
View through CrossRef
The Donatist party began around 312 ce when Mensurius, bishop of Carthage, died and was replaced by Caecilian. Caecilian’s accusers claimed that he had been ordained by a traditor, someone who had “handed over” the scriptures to Roman officials during the Diocletian persecution. This ordination by a traditor allegedly contaminated Caecilian and all who continued in his communion with the contagion of idolatry, and therefore his ordination was seen as invalidated. In his place the opposing party appointed Majorinus as the rightful bishop of Carthage, and when he died, he was succeeded by Donatus, for whom the party eventually was named. Caecilian and his supporters continued to claim his innocence from such contagion, and so the Donatists appealed to Constantine. A council was summoned to Rome which ruled on Caecilian’s behalf. The Donatists again appealed, and so a larger council met in Arles in 314 and ruled again for Caecilian. When the Donatists still refused to recognize Caecilian, and since they broke fellowship with all in communion with him, Constantine pressured the Donatists with legal and even violent means. This schism continued through the 4th century with sporadic violence between the parties: Caecilian’s party could invoke government officials to enforce their legitimacy, while the Donatists were accused of utilizing the Circumcellions, a group which functioned as a violent mob. In the late 4th century, writers such as Optatus of Milevis and Augustine articulated a defense of their own “Catholic” party through various pamphlets and treatises; they claimed that their party was never guilty of such contagion, and that the Donatists were so concerned with the purity of the church that they had forsaken its catholicity. In short, the Donatists allegedly believed that their party in North Africa was the only remaining true church. In the late 4th and early 5th centuries, the government, advised by Augustine’s party, developed stricter attempts to coerce the Donatists. In 411 a conference met in Carthage at which the Donatists were found to be “heretics,” which finalized the Roman policy against them by requiring the enforcement of heresy laws against this party. While there is ongoing evidence for Donatists long after Augustine’s time, when the Vandals invaded and conquered North Africa beginning in 429, the Donatist controversy largely disappeared in the surviving literary sources.
Title: Donatus and Donatism
Description:
The Donatist party began around 312 ce when Mensurius, bishop of Carthage, died and was replaced by Caecilian.
Caecilian’s accusers claimed that he had been ordained by a traditor, someone who had “handed over” the scriptures to Roman officials during the Diocletian persecution.
This ordination by a traditor allegedly contaminated Caecilian and all who continued in his communion with the contagion of idolatry, and therefore his ordination was seen as invalidated.
In his place the opposing party appointed Majorinus as the rightful bishop of Carthage, and when he died, he was succeeded by Donatus, for whom the party eventually was named.
Caecilian and his supporters continued to claim his innocence from such contagion, and so the Donatists appealed to Constantine.
A council was summoned to Rome which ruled on Caecilian’s behalf.
The Donatists again appealed, and so a larger council met in Arles in 314 and ruled again for Caecilian.
When the Donatists still refused to recognize Caecilian, and since they broke fellowship with all in communion with him, Constantine pressured the Donatists with legal and even violent means.
This schism continued through the 4th century with sporadic violence between the parties: Caecilian’s party could invoke government officials to enforce their legitimacy, while the Donatists were accused of utilizing the Circumcellions, a group which functioned as a violent mob.
In the late 4th century, writers such as Optatus of Milevis and Augustine articulated a defense of their own “Catholic” party through various pamphlets and treatises; they claimed that their party was never guilty of such contagion, and that the Donatists were so concerned with the purity of the church that they had forsaken its catholicity.
In short, the Donatists allegedly believed that their party in North Africa was the only remaining true church.
In the late 4th and early 5th centuries, the government, advised by Augustine’s party, developed stricter attempts to coerce the Donatists.
In 411 a conference met in Carthage at which the Donatists were found to be “heretics,” which finalized the Roman policy against them by requiring the enforcement of heresy laws against this party.
While there is ongoing evidence for Donatists long after Augustine’s time, when the Vandals invaded and conquered North Africa beginning in 429, the Donatist controversy largely disappeared in the surviving literary sources.
Related Results
Medieval donatus commentaries
Medieval donatus commentaries
Summary
The rich treasure-house of unedited grammatical material, some of which has already been reported, held in various manuscript collections dating from the Middle Ages contai...
Verg. Aen. 9. 427: A linguist’s perspective
Verg. Aen. 9. 427: A linguist’s perspective
This article offers a linguistic commentary on the verse Verg. Aen. 9. 427 me, me, adsum qui feci, in me conuertite ferrum, in which the personal pronoun in the accusative needs in...
Donatus, Tiberius Claudius
Donatus, Tiberius Claudius
AbstractTiberius Claudius Donatus (not to be confused with the earlier scholar Aelius Donatus) is known only as the author of the extantInterpretationes Vergilianae, a line‐by‐line...
Donatus, Aelius
Donatus, Aelius
AbstractAelius Donatus (not to be confused with the later scholar Tiberius Claudius Donatus) was an importantgrammaticusand commentator on Latin literary texts active in Rome in th...
Exploring the Impact of Convolutional Neural Networks on Facial Emotion Detection and Recognition
Exploring the Impact of Convolutional Neural Networks on Facial Emotion Detection and Recognition
Emotional analytics is a fascinating blend of psychology and technology, with one of the primary methods for recognizing emotions involving facial expression analysis. Facial emoti...
Comparative Analysis of Spectrogram and MFCC Representations for Speech Emotion Recognition Using Machine Learning
Comparative Analysis of Spectrogram and MFCC Representations for Speech Emotion Recognition Using Machine Learning
Emotion recognition is a key area of research within human-computer interaction, addressing the growing need for systems that can respond to human emotional states. While advanceme...
Development of an Optimised Neural Network Model for RF Based UAV Detection and Identification
Development of an Optimised Neural Network Model for RF Based UAV Detection and Identification
The rapid popularity of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) or drones is due to its great promise for various commercial and recreational applications. Moreover, technological advance...
‘Donatus’ and Athenian phratries
‘Donatus’ and Athenian phratries
My purpose in this paper is to reassert the traditional view that Athenian women of the classical period regularly had an association with phratries (and incidentally to clarify th...

