Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Immunoglobulin-E Mediated Chlorhexidine Hypersensitivity among Healthcare Workers

View through CrossRef
Objective: With a wide spectrum antimicrobial activity that is not affected by body fluids and blood, chlorhexidine is a particularly useful disinfectant widely used in healthcare settings. Given the importance of disinfectant usage by healthcare workers to prevent nosocomial infections, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study aims to evaluate the prevalence of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated sensitivity in healthcare workers. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted through a questionnaire and immunoassay for chlorhexidine- specific IgE in healthcare workers in a large teaching hospital in London, UK. The prevalence of IgE-mediated chlorhexidine hypersensitivity was determined along with potential determinants. Results: With a 77.7% response rate, the study showed that 4 out of 233 participants were positive for chlorhexidine-specific IgE, with an overall prevalence of 1.72% (95% Confidence Interval: 0.05% to 3.39%). All the positive cases belonged to occupationally exposed healthcare workers. In this group, the prevalence rate was 2.82% (95% Confidence Interval: 0.1% to 5.54%). Conclusion: Chlorhexidine is a potential allergen and an under-reported cause of anaphylaxis in patient-care and occupational settings. The results suggest that chlorhexidine has a relatively safe profile for healthcare workers in occupational settings, but a higher prevalence of chlorhexidine hypersensitivity cannot be ruled out. Sensitized healthcare workers must be advised to avoid further exposure to prevent potentially serious IgE-mediated allergic symptoms. Further studies are recommended to determine if any change in disinfection guidelines and protocols is warranted.
Title: Immunoglobulin-E Mediated Chlorhexidine Hypersensitivity among Healthcare Workers
Description:
Objective: With a wide spectrum antimicrobial activity that is not affected by body fluids and blood, chlorhexidine is a particularly useful disinfectant widely used in healthcare settings.
Given the importance of disinfectant usage by healthcare workers to prevent nosocomial infections, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study aims to evaluate the prevalence of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated sensitivity in healthcare workers.
Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted through a questionnaire and immunoassay for chlorhexidine- specific IgE in healthcare workers in a large teaching hospital in London, UK.
The prevalence of IgE-mediated chlorhexidine hypersensitivity was determined along with potential determinants.
Results: With a 77.
7% response rate, the study showed that 4 out of 233 participants were positive for chlorhexidine-specific IgE, with an overall prevalence of 1.
72% (95% Confidence Interval: 0.
05% to 3.
39%).
All the positive cases belonged to occupationally exposed healthcare workers.
In this group, the prevalence rate was 2.
82% (95% Confidence Interval: 0.
1% to 5.
54%).
Conclusion: Chlorhexidine is a potential allergen and an under-reported cause of anaphylaxis in patient-care and occupational settings.
The results suggest that chlorhexidine has a relatively safe profile for healthcare workers in occupational settings, but a higher prevalence of chlorhexidine hypersensitivity cannot be ruled out.
Sensitized healthcare workers must be advised to avoid further exposure to prevent potentially serious IgE-mediated allergic symptoms.
Further studies are recommended to determine if any change in disinfection guidelines and protocols is warranted.

Related Results

Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Abstract Introduction Telemedicine is the remote delivery of healthcare services using information and communication technologies and has gained global recognition as a solution to...
Chlorhexidine-induced anaphylaxis occurring in the workplace in a health-care worker: case report and review of the literature
Chlorhexidine-induced anaphylaxis occurring in the workplace in a health-care worker: case report and review of the literature
Background: Chlorhexidine has been widely used in the occupational field as an effective antiseptic and disinfectant, especially in the health-care services. Several cases of aller...
Data about application of chlorhexidine as a periodontal irrigant – Systematic Review.
Data about application of chlorhexidine as a periodontal irrigant – Systematic Review.
Introduction. The most commonly used lavage solution for periodontal irrigation are diluted antiseptic solutions, the most important of them, is chlorhexidine solution. The ability...
Immunoassay of serum polypeptide hormones by using 125I-labelled anti(-immunoglobulin G) antibodies
Immunoassay of serum polypeptide hormones by using 125I-labelled anti(-immunoglobulin G) antibodies
1. A technique for indirectly labelling antibodies to polypeptide hormones, by combining them with radioactively labelled anti-(immunoglobulin G) is described. (a) 125I-labelled an...
ILP4 and InR regulate Paclitaxel-induced hypersensitivity differently in Drosophila larvae
ILP4 and InR regulate Paclitaxel-induced hypersensitivity differently in Drosophila larvae
Abstract Paclitaxel (PTX), a chemotherapeutic that stabilizes microtubules, induces nociceptive hypersensitivity and sensory neuron damage in humans, mice, and flies. T...
Prevalence of Piperacillin-Tazobactam induced Hypersensitivity Reaction in Workers of Stallion’s Pharmaceutical Factory at Lahore
Prevalence of Piperacillin-Tazobactam induced Hypersensitivity Reaction in Workers of Stallion’s Pharmaceutical Factory at Lahore
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Piperacillin is an antibiotic that belongs to the ureidopenicillin family. Piperacillin-tazobactam provides cover against gram-positive, gram-negative b...

Back to Top