Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Caution on Using Tetrahydrofuran for Processing Crystalline Silica Samples From Engineered Stone for XRD Analysis
View through CrossRef
Abstract
We conducted laboratory experiments to investigate a suspected effect of tetrahydrofuran (THF) on quantifying crystalline silica in samples collected from working with engineered stone when THF is used to process samples prior to the X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. Two groups of samples from grinding either engineered stone or granite were simultaneously taken from a laboratory testing system, with one group of samples using THF for processing and another group using muffle furnace for ashing. For each stone type, we also tested four levels of respirable dust loading on the samples by varying the grinding time from 1 to 8 min. Statistical analysis of the experimental results on crystalline silica contents of the two groups of samples showed that the difference between the two methods was not significant (P ≥ 0.05) for the granite at all four levels of respirable dust loading and for the engineered stone at the two levels of respirable dust loading greater than 0.5 mg. However, the crystalline silica content from using THF processing was significantly lower (P = 0.001) than that from using muffle furnace ashing for engineered stone when the respirable dust loading levels were less than 0.5 mg. For the engineered stone dust samples with grinding times of 1 and 2 min, the average respirable dust loading was about 0.19 and 0.34 mg, respectively; while the crystalline silica content from using THF processing was 30.9 and 21.5% lower than that from using muffle furnace ashing, respectively. Since most full-shift samples from field assessments in this industry are expected to have respirable dust loading less than 0.5 mg, muffle furnace or radio frequency plasma ashing should be specified as the preferred sample processing method instead of the THF processing method for quantification of crystalline silica when engineered stone is expected to present to avoid artificially reduced silica content values, which are likely caused by the reactions between THF and the resins in engineered stone.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Caution on Using Tetrahydrofuran for Processing Crystalline Silica Samples From Engineered Stone for XRD Analysis
Description:
Abstract
We conducted laboratory experiments to investigate a suspected effect of tetrahydrofuran (THF) on quantifying crystalline silica in samples collected from working with engineered stone when THF is used to process samples prior to the X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis.
Two groups of samples from grinding either engineered stone or granite were simultaneously taken from a laboratory testing system, with one group of samples using THF for processing and another group using muffle furnace for ashing.
For each stone type, we also tested four levels of respirable dust loading on the samples by varying the grinding time from 1 to 8 min.
Statistical analysis of the experimental results on crystalline silica contents of the two groups of samples showed that the difference between the two methods was not significant (P ≥ 0.
05) for the granite at all four levels of respirable dust loading and for the engineered stone at the two levels of respirable dust loading greater than 0.
5 mg.
However, the crystalline silica content from using THF processing was significantly lower (P = 0.
001) than that from using muffle furnace ashing for engineered stone when the respirable dust loading levels were less than 0.
5 mg.
For the engineered stone dust samples with grinding times of 1 and 2 min, the average respirable dust loading was about 0.
19 and 0.
34 mg, respectively; while the crystalline silica content from using THF processing was 30.
9 and 21.
5% lower than that from using muffle furnace ashing, respectively.
Since most full-shift samples from field assessments in this industry are expected to have respirable dust loading less than 0.
5 mg, muffle furnace or radio frequency plasma ashing should be specified as the preferred sample processing method instead of the THF processing method for quantification of crystalline silica when engineered stone is expected to present to avoid artificially reduced silica content values, which are likely caused by the reactions between THF and the resins in engineered stone.
Related Results
The effect of skin-to-stone distance on success in renal pelvis stones treated with ESWL
The effect of skin-to-stone distance on success in renal pelvis stones treated with ESWL
Our study aimed to investigate the effect of stone load, skin-to-stone distance, and stone density Hounsfield Unit (HU) measured in unenhanced computed tomography on the success of...
Echinococcus granulosus in Environmental Samples: A Cross-Sectional Molecular Study
Echinococcus granulosus in Environmental Samples: A Cross-Sectional Molecular Study
Abstract
Introduction
Echinococcosis, caused by tapeworms of the Echinococcus genus, remains a significant zoonotic disease globally. The disease is particularly prevalent in areas...
Silica and lung cancer: a controversial issue
Silica and lung cancer: a controversial issue
The role of crystalline silica in lung cancer has long been the subject of controversy. In this article, we review the main experimental and epidemiological studies dealing with th...
ANALISIS TERJADINYA SCALING SILICA PADA CONDENSER DAN COOLING TOWER
ANALISIS TERJADINYA SCALING SILICA PADA CONDENSER DAN COOLING TOWER
Silica scaling in geothermal production fields can clog the fluid flow rate. Research has been conducted to determine the occurrence of scaling sillica in brine. The method used in...
Effectiveness of Silica Sulphate Catalyst Based on Rice Husk Ash in The Oleic Acid Esterification Process
Effectiveness of Silica Sulphate Catalyst Based on Rice Husk Ash in The Oleic Acid Esterification Process
Rice husk contains a lot of silica, so it is widely used as research material. One example is as a raw material for the synthesis of silica sulfate. Silica sulfate was synthesized ...
STONE FREE RATES OF KIDNEY STONE WAS LOWER THAN THE ONE OF URETER STONE PATIENTS MANAGED BY ESWL AND THE ONE OF URETER STONE MANAGED BY URETEROLITHOTRIPSY
STONE FREE RATES OF KIDNEY STONE WAS LOWER THAN THE ONE OF URETER STONE PATIENTS MANAGED BY ESWL AND THE ONE OF URETER STONE MANAGED BY URETEROLITHOTRIPSY
Objective: To evaluate the stone free rates of kidney and ureter stone patients managed by Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL), and the ureter stone free rate managed by ur...
Correlation between body size and stone composition in pediatric stone patients
Correlation between body size and stone composition in pediatric stone patients
Abstract
Purpose
Due to the lack of stone composition data, the relationship between BMI and stone composition in children is rarely reported. Our study encompassed more c...
pO2 and pCO2 Increment in Post‐dialyzer Blood: The Role of Dialysate
pO2 and pCO2 Increment in Post‐dialyzer Blood: The Role of Dialysate
Abstract: Blood returning from a dialyzer during hemodialysis has a higher pO2 and pCO2 content than blood entering the dialyzer, and this has been attributed to the dialysate. Th...

