Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Breeches of Decorum: The Figure of a Barbarian in Montaigne and Addison

View through CrossRef
This essay proceeds from the suggestion that Joseph Addison alludes to Michel de Montaigne's "Des Cannibales" in Spectator 50, when Mr. Spectator relates the visit to London of "four Indian kings." Addison adapts Montaigne's playful allegory of barbarism and civilization in service of his own project of constructing a discursive model of civic society, ultimately consigning Montaigne himself to the category of the barbaric in order to re-establish the distinction, which the "lively old Gascon" has mischievously undermined with the jest about breeches that concludes his essay. Montaigne implies that if civilization is reducible to its signs, then the civilized, decorous body that breeches signify is civilized precisely because the breeches displace— replace as well as conceal—it, and what breeches conceal may equally be the body of a barbarian. Indeed, the naked body must, according to the categorical limits established here, be barbaric. Breeches therefore are not just the sign of civilized decorum, they are its very substance. Addison's solution is to restabilize, by rhetorical means, the constitutive oppositions that Montaigne's breeches jest undoes. The figural logic that underpins the clothing tropes is metonymic in the first instance; breeches are associated with civilization and with masculinity. In Lockean linguistics the relationship between words and ideas/things is always metonymic contiguity. The relation between civilized man and barbarian, on the other hand, is comparative and hence metaphoric. In spite of his strenuously avowed mistrust of language that takes on the autonomous qualities of ideas or things, Addison is willing to locate what Locke calls "natural correspondence and connection" in relationships that are primarily and essentially metaphoric; constitutive oppositions that establish necessary difference rather than resemblance, but are nonetheless metaphoric in the first instance.
Title: Breeches of Decorum: The Figure of a Barbarian in Montaigne and Addison
Description:
This essay proceeds from the suggestion that Joseph Addison alludes to Michel de Montaigne's "Des Cannibales" in Spectator 50, when Mr.
Spectator relates the visit to London of "four Indian kings.
" Addison adapts Montaigne's playful allegory of barbarism and civilization in service of his own project of constructing a discursive model of civic society, ultimately consigning Montaigne himself to the category of the barbaric in order to re-establish the distinction, which the "lively old Gascon" has mischievously undermined with the jest about breeches that concludes his essay.
Montaigne implies that if civilization is reducible to its signs, then the civilized, decorous body that breeches signify is civilized precisely because the breeches displace— replace as well as conceal—it, and what breeches conceal may equally be the body of a barbarian.
Indeed, the naked body must, according to the categorical limits established here, be barbaric.
Breeches therefore are not just the sign of civilized decorum, they are its very substance.
Addison's solution is to restabilize, by rhetorical means, the constitutive oppositions that Montaigne's breeches jest undoes.
The figural logic that underpins the clothing tropes is metonymic in the first instance; breeches are associated with civilization and with masculinity.
In Lockean linguistics the relationship between words and ideas/things is always metonymic contiguity.
The relation between civilized man and barbarian, on the other hand, is comparative and hence metaphoric.
In spite of his strenuously avowed mistrust of language that takes on the autonomous qualities of ideas or things, Addison is willing to locate what Locke calls "natural correspondence and connection" in relationships that are primarily and essentially metaphoric; constitutive oppositions that establish necessary difference rather than resemblance, but are nonetheless metaphoric in the first instance.

Related Results

Was Addison a Poet?
Was Addison a Poet?
Abstract This chapter provides an account of Addison’s poetic career—the first such account since the nineteenth century—and confronts the question of why, although ...
Addison, Samuel Johnson, and the Test of Time
Addison, Samuel Johnson, and the Test of Time
Abstract This chapter explores the contours of Addison’s afterlife in the eighteenth century by looking carefully at Samuel Johnson’s varied criticism of his works o...
Joseph Addison
Joseph Addison
Abstract Joseph Addison: Tercentenary Essays is a collection of fifteen essays by a team of internationally recognized experts specially commissioned to commemorate ...
Marie de Gournay
Marie de Gournay
Philosopher, translator, fiction writer, and editor: it is virtually impossible to pin down one authorial or scholarly identity for Marie de Gournay (b. 1565–d. 1645). Over the cou...
Remerciements
Remerciements
Les directrices de ce numéro tiennent à remercier le comité scientifique composé de Cyril Camus (CPGE / CAS, Toulouse-Jean Jaurès), Yves Davo (Université de Bordeaux), Magali Fleur...
Addison as Critic and Critical Theorist
Addison as Critic and Critical Theorist
Abstract In the first half of the twentieth century Addison’s literary-critical and theoretical works were understood as early formulations of a literary aesthetics,...
Nature Transformed: English Landscape Gardens and <i>Theatrum Mundi</i>
Nature Transformed: English Landscape Gardens and <i>Theatrum Mundi</i>
IntroductionThe European will to modify the natural world emerged through English landscape design during the eighteenth century. Released from the neo-classical aesthetic dichotom...
Decorum/Verisimilitude
Decorum/Verisimilitude
“Decorum” refers to the norm of propriety in a literary work, and maybe understood in various possible, often overlapping ways. Decorum requires, first, the author to adopt a style...

Back to Top