Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

AVO in transversely isotropic media; an overview

View through CrossRef
Abstract The amplitude variation with offset (AVO) responses of elastic transversely isotropic media are sensitive to contrasts in both of Thomsen's anisotropic parameters delta and epsilon . The equation describing P-P reflections indicates that the smaller the contrasts in isotropic properties (compressional velocity, shear velocity, and density) and the larger the contrasts in delta and epsilon across an interface of reflection, the greater the effects of anisotropy on the AVO signature. Contrasts in delta are most important under small-to-medium angles of incidence as previously described by Banik (1987), while contrasts in epsilon can have a strong influence on amplitudes for the larger angles of incidence commonly encountered in exploration (20 degrees and beyond). Consequently, using Rutherford and Williams' AVO classification of isotropic gas sands, type I gas sands overlain by a transversely isotropic (TI) shale exhibit a larger decrease in AVO than if the shale had been isotropic, and type III gas sands overlain by a transversely isotropic (TI) shale exhibit a larger increase in AVO than if the shale had been isotropic. Furthermore, it is possible for a 'type III' isotropic water sand to exhibit an 'unexpected' increase in AVO if the overlying shale is sufficiently anisotropic.More quantitative AVO interpretations in TI media require considerations of viscoelastic TI in addition to elastic TI and lead to complicated integrated earth models. However, when elastic and viscoelastic TI have the same axis of symmetry in a shale overlying an isotropic sand, both elastic and viscoelastic TI affect the overall AVO response in the same direction by constructively increasing/decreasing the isotropic component of the AVO response. Continued efforts in this area will lead to more realistic reservoir models and hopefully answer some of the unexplained pitfalls in AVO interpretation.
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Title: AVO in transversely isotropic media; an overview
Description:
Abstract The amplitude variation with offset (AVO) responses of elastic transversely isotropic media are sensitive to contrasts in both of Thomsen's anisotropic parameters delta and epsilon .
The equation describing P-P reflections indicates that the smaller the contrasts in isotropic properties (compressional velocity, shear velocity, and density) and the larger the contrasts in delta and epsilon across an interface of reflection, the greater the effects of anisotropy on the AVO signature.
Contrasts in delta are most important under small-to-medium angles of incidence as previously described by Banik (1987), while contrasts in epsilon can have a strong influence on amplitudes for the larger angles of incidence commonly encountered in exploration (20 degrees and beyond).
Consequently, using Rutherford and Williams' AVO classification of isotropic gas sands, type I gas sands overlain by a transversely isotropic (TI) shale exhibit a larger decrease in AVO than if the shale had been isotropic, and type III gas sands overlain by a transversely isotropic (TI) shale exhibit a larger increase in AVO than if the shale had been isotropic.
Furthermore, it is possible for a 'type III' isotropic water sand to exhibit an 'unexpected' increase in AVO if the overlying shale is sufficiently anisotropic.
More quantitative AVO interpretations in TI media require considerations of viscoelastic TI in addition to elastic TI and lead to complicated integrated earth models.
However, when elastic and viscoelastic TI have the same axis of symmetry in a shale overlying an isotropic sand, both elastic and viscoelastic TI affect the overall AVO response in the same direction by constructively increasing/decreasing the isotropic component of the AVO response.
Continued efforts in this area will lead to more realistic reservoir models and hopefully answer some of the unexplained pitfalls in AVO interpretation.

Related Results

Numerical Study of Fracture Propagation in Isotropic and Transverse Isotropic Rocks Using Coupled Peridynamic and FEM
Numerical Study of Fracture Propagation in Isotropic and Transverse Isotropic Rocks Using Coupled Peridynamic and FEM
ABSTRACT In this paper, we propose a new simulation method based on peridynamic for quasi-static fracture propagation in isotropic and transverse isotropic rocks....
Bayesian joint residual moveout and amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion
Bayesian joint residual moveout and amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion
ABSTRACT Residual moveout (RMO) can have a severe impact on seismic amplitude-variation-with-offset (AVO) analysis. It is, therefore, common practice to quality c...
Effect of Elastic Modulus and Poisson's Ratio on Guided Wave Dispersion Using Transversely Isotropic Material Modelling
Effect of Elastic Modulus and Poisson's Ratio on Guided Wave Dispersion Using Transversely Isotropic Material Modelling
Timber poles are commonly used for telecommunication and power distribution networks, wharves or jetties, piling or as a substructure of short span bridges. Most of the available t...
Nonbright-spot AVO; two examples
Nonbright-spot AVO; two examples
Abstract The use of amplitude variation with offset (AVO) attribute sections such as the product of the normal incidence trace (A) and the gradient trace (B) have...
Seismic Models of the Barik Reservoir
Seismic Models of the Barik Reservoir
Abstract Seismic modeled responses for known geological models, often using well logs, help interpret field seismic data for reservoir characterization. The seismic ...
3-D AVO analysis and modeling applied to fracture detection in coalbed methane reservoirs
3-D AVO analysis and modeling applied to fracture detection in coalbed methane reservoirs
Abstract Over the years, amplitude variation with-offset (AVO) analysis has been used successfully to predict reservoir properties and fluid contents, in some cas...
Three-component amplitude versus offset analysis
Three-component amplitude versus offset analysis
Three-component (3-C) amplitude versus offset (AVO) inversion is the AVO analysis of the three major energies in the seismic data, P-waves, S-waves and converted waves. For each ty...

Back to Top