Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Donor risk analysis and validation in heart transplants: a single-centre experience

View through CrossRef
Abstract OBJECTIVES A heart transplant (Htx) remains the gold standard treatment for patients with advanced heart failure. Considering the limited availability of organs, donor risk scores might improve organ selection and allocation. The objective of the study was to compare United Network for Organ Sharing, RADIAL and Eurotransplant scoring models in calculating post-Htx outcomes in an Italian Htx population. METHODS Between January 2000 and December 2017, a total of 461 adult patients underwent Htxs. United Network for Organ Sharing, RADIAL and Eurotransplant scores were calculated. Clinical features and donor risk scores were tested to identify preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk variables and eventually validate the scores on our population. RESULTS Early graft failure was detected in 16.1% (74/461). Post-Htx extracorporeal life support was used in 11.1% (51/461). Of the donor-related factors, the use of noradrenaline (P = 0.015) negatively influenced early outcomes, whereas an ischaemic time >240 min (P = 0.037) influenced early graft failure occurrence. The Eurotransplant donor score did not impact outcomes; the RADIAL score significantly influenced both early and late mortality; and the United Network for Organ Sharing score influenced only late mortality. On the multivariable analysis, after adjustment of scores per cohort, noradrenaline infusion was the main independent predictor of in-hospital mortality for the donors, whereas age of the recipient [odds ratio (OR) 1.003, 1.003–1.081; P = 0.032] and use of preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR 3.320, 1.124–9.805; P = 0.030) were the main independent predictors for the recipients. CONCLUSIONS None of the validated donor scoring systems fully behave as reliable predictors of transplant outcomes. According to our ‘local only’ graft selection, specific donor and recipient risk variables should be monitored in order to predict early and late outcomes satisfactorily.
Title: Donor risk analysis and validation in heart transplants: a single-centre experience
Description:
Abstract OBJECTIVES A heart transplant (Htx) remains the gold standard treatment for patients with advanced heart failure.
Considering the limited availability of organs, donor risk scores might improve organ selection and allocation.
The objective of the study was to compare United Network for Organ Sharing, RADIAL and Eurotransplant scoring models in calculating post-Htx outcomes in an Italian Htx population.
METHODS Between January 2000 and December 2017, a total of 461 adult patients underwent Htxs.
United Network for Organ Sharing, RADIAL and Eurotransplant scores were calculated.
Clinical features and donor risk scores were tested to identify preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk variables and eventually validate the scores on our population.
RESULTS Early graft failure was detected in 16.
1% (74/461).
Post-Htx extracorporeal life support was used in 11.
1% (51/461).
Of the donor-related factors, the use of noradrenaline (P = 0.
015) negatively influenced early outcomes, whereas an ischaemic time >240 min (P = 0.
037) influenced early graft failure occurrence.
The Eurotransplant donor score did not impact outcomes; the RADIAL score significantly influenced both early and late mortality; and the United Network for Organ Sharing score influenced only late mortality.
On the multivariable analysis, after adjustment of scores per cohort, noradrenaline infusion was the main independent predictor of in-hospital mortality for the donors, whereas age of the recipient [odds ratio (OR) 1.
003, 1.
003–1.
081; P = 0.
032] and use of preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR 3.
320, 1.
124–9.
805; P = 0.
030) were the main independent predictors for the recipients.
CONCLUSIONS None of the validated donor scoring systems fully behave as reliable predictors of transplant outcomes.
According to our ‘local only’ graft selection, specific donor and recipient risk variables should be monitored in order to predict early and late outcomes satisfactorily.

Related Results

Kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: lack of impact of delayed graft function on post‐transplant outcomes
Kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: lack of impact of delayed graft function on post‐transplant outcomes
Singh RP, Farney AC, Rogers J, Zuckerman J, Reeves‐Daniel A, Hartmann E, Iskandar S, Adams P, Stratta RJ. Kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: lack of i...
Finding people like me: contact among young adults who share an open-identity sperm donor
Finding people like me: contact among young adults who share an open-identity sperm donor
Abstract STUDY QUESTION What interests and experiences do donor-conceived adults have with respect to same-donor peers/siblings,...
Osoby niejednokrotnie przebywające w izbie wytrzeźwień
Osoby niejednokrotnie przebywające w izbie wytrzeźwień
In Poland we have at present in towns 29 detoxication centres with 1,226 beds; people found by the police in public places in a state of intoxication are more and more often taken ...
Perspectives on sperm donor anonymity: insights from donor-conceived adults in Belgium
Perspectives on sperm donor anonymity: insights from donor-conceived adults in Belgium
Abstract STUDY QUESTION Are donor-conceived adults in Belgium interested in obtaining donor information, and do these interests ...
MO927IMPACT OF DONOR AGE ON LIVING DONOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
MO927IMPACT OF DONOR AGE ON LIVING DONOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
Abstract Background and Aims Although elderly living donors are recognized as a marginal donor for kidney transplantation, the n...

Back to Top