Javascript must be enabled to continue!
COMPARISON OF STENTED VERSUS NON-STENTED PATIENTS OF URETERIC CALCULI AFTER INTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY
View through CrossRef
Background: Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological condition resulting from crystalline deposits in the urinary tract, often manifesting as acute flank pain and lower urinary tract symptoms. Ureteral stents, commonly placed after ureteroscopic lithotripsy to ensure patency and prevent complications, may themselves cause discomfort, hematuria, and infection. Given this clinical dilemma, evaluating the necessity of routine stent placement is vital to improve postoperative recovery and patient quality of life.
Objective: To compare the postoperative outcomes in terms of pain and hematuria between stented and non-stented patients undergoing ureteroscopic intracorporeal lithotripsy for ureteric calculi.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, Peshawar, from August 2024 to January 2025. A total of 170 patients aged 18–65 years with confirmed unilateral ureteric calculi were enrolled and randomized into two groups. Group A (n=85) received a 6 Fr double J ureteral stent post-procedure, while Group B (n=85) did not. All patients underwent ureteroscopic intracorporeal lithotripsy using a 6 Fr ureteroscope and pneumatic lithotripter under general anesthesia. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and hematuria was defined as ≥3 red blood cells per high-power field in centrifuged urine. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v23, with p-values ≤0.05 considered significant.
Results: The mean VAS pain score in the non-stented group was significantly lower (3.2 ± 1.7) compared to the stented group (5.8 ± 2.1), p<0.001. Mild pain was reported in 61.2% of non-stented patients versus 22.4% in stented patients, while severe pain occurred in only 4.7% of non-stented compared to 34.1% of stented patients. Hematuria was present in 28.2% of the non-stented group versus 50.6% of the stented group (p=0.002).
Conclusion: Routine ureteral stenting following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy significantly increases postoperative discomfort and hematuria. A selective, risk-based stent placement strategy may offer safer, more comfortable recovery and optimized resource utilization.
Health and Research Insights
Title: COMPARISON OF STENTED VERSUS NON-STENTED PATIENTS OF URETERIC CALCULI AFTER INTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY
Description:
Background: Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological condition resulting from crystalline deposits in the urinary tract, often manifesting as acute flank pain and lower urinary tract symptoms.
Ureteral stents, commonly placed after ureteroscopic lithotripsy to ensure patency and prevent complications, may themselves cause discomfort, hematuria, and infection.
Given this clinical dilemma, evaluating the necessity of routine stent placement is vital to improve postoperative recovery and patient quality of life.
Objective: To compare the postoperative outcomes in terms of pain and hematuria between stented and non-stented patients undergoing ureteroscopic intracorporeal lithotripsy for ureteric calculi.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, Peshawar, from August 2024 to January 2025.
A total of 170 patients aged 18–65 years with confirmed unilateral ureteric calculi were enrolled and randomized into two groups.
Group A (n=85) received a 6 Fr double J ureteral stent post-procedure, while Group B (n=85) did not.
All patients underwent ureteroscopic intracorporeal lithotripsy using a 6 Fr ureteroscope and pneumatic lithotripter under general anesthesia.
Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and hematuria was defined as ≥3 red blood cells per high-power field in centrifuged urine.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v23, with p-values ≤0.
05 considered significant.
Results: The mean VAS pain score in the non-stented group was significantly lower (3.
2 ± 1.
7) compared to the stented group (5.
8 ± 2.
1), p<0.
001.
Mild pain was reported in 61.
2% of non-stented patients versus 22.
4% in stented patients, while severe pain occurred in only 4.
7% of non-stented compared to 34.
1% of stented patients.
Hematuria was present in 28.
2% of the non-stented group versus 50.
6% of the stented group (p=0.
002).
Conclusion: Routine ureteral stenting following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy significantly increases postoperative discomfort and hematuria.
A selective, risk-based stent placement strategy may offer safer, more comfortable recovery and optimized resource utilization.
Related Results
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Urolithiasis is a prevailing urological condition, with ureteric stones affecting around 22% of cases, mostly causing severe pain and other complications. Surveillance, medical the...
Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy versus Ballistic Lithotripsy for Treatment of Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Comparative Study
Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy versus Ballistic Lithotripsy for Treatment of Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Comparative Study
<i>Objectives:</i> This study was undertaken to compare the results of laser (Ho:YAG) and pneumatic (ballistic) intracorporeal lithotripsy for ureteric calculi in terms...
Semi-Rigid Pneumatic Ureteroscopicremoval of Ureteric Stone; Seven Years Experience At Nepalgunj Medical College
Semi-Rigid Pneumatic Ureteroscopicremoval of Ureteric Stone; Seven Years Experience At Nepalgunj Medical College
Background: The present study aimed to report the outcomes of ureteroscopy (URS) treatment of ureteric stone with semi-rigid pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy.Method: This was a ...
Comparison of early results between intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic colectomy
Comparison of early results between intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic colectomy
Abstract
Introduction: The study aim was to compare the operative time, estimated blood loss, number of harvested lymph nodes, intraoperative and postoperative complications, as we...
COMPARISON OF PNEUMATIC AND EMS SWISS TRILOGY LITHOTRIPSY IN CONVENTIONAL PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
COMPARISON OF PNEUMATIC AND EMS SWISS TRILOGY LITHOTRIPSY IN CONVENTIONAL PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
Background: Renal calculi are a significant urological burden globally, with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) being the treatment of choice for large stones. Intracorporeal lith...
COMPARISON OF THE SUCCESS OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY (ESWL) WITH AND WITHOUT DJ STENTING IN PROXIMAL URETERIC STONE
COMPARISON OF THE SUCCESS OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY (ESWL) WITH AND WITHOUT DJ STENTING IN PROXIMAL URETERIC STONE
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: There is disagreement in the use of ureteral double-J stent before the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), although most of the urologists sug...
Covid 19 Make us Confident to Perform ESWL Sessions for Treatment of Ureteric Stone
Covid 19 Make us Confident to Perform ESWL Sessions for Treatment of Ureteric Stone
Abstract
The clinicians prefer URS as a first-line line treatment of upper ureteric stones but with COVID-19 restrictions and considering the patient's benefit, ESWL sessio...
The clinical efficacy of novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi
The clinical efficacy of novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi
Abstract
This study investigated the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi. A total of 160 patients ...


