RATE OF O2 PRODUCTION DERIVED FROM PULSE‐AMPLITUDE‐MODULATED FLUORESCENCE: TESTING THREE BIOOPTICAL APPROACHES AGAINST MEASURED O2‐PRODUCTION RATE1

Light absorption by phytoplankton is both species specific and affected by photoacclimational status. To estimate oxygenic photosynthesis from pulse‐amplitude‐modulated (PAM) fluorescence, the amount of quanta absorbed by PSII needs to be quantified. We present here three different biooptical approaches to estimate the fraction of light absorbed by PSII: (1) the factor 0.5, which implies that absorbed light is equally distributed among PSI and PSII; (2) the fraction of chl a in PSII, determined as the ratio between the scaled red‐peak fluorescence excitation and the red absorption peak; and (3) the measure of light absorbed by PSII, determined from the scaling of the fluorescence excitation spectra to the absorption spectra by the “no‐overshoot” procedure. Three marine phytoplankton species were used as test organisms: Prorocentrum minimum (Pavill.) J. Schiller (Dinophyceae), Prymnesium parvum cf. patelliferum (J. C. Green, D. J. Hibberd et Pienaar) A. Larsen (Haptophyceae), and Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin (Bacillariophyceae). Photosynthesis versus irradiance (P vs. E) parameters calculated using the three approaches were compared with P versus E parameters obtained from simultaneously measured rates of oxygen production. Generally, approach 1 underestimated, while approach 2 overestimated the gross O2‐production rate calculated from PAM fluorescence. Approach 3, in principle the best approach to estimate quanta absorbed by PSII, was also superior according to observations. Hence, we recommend approach 3 for estimation of gross O2‐production rates based on PAM fluorescence measurements.