Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Institutional repositories: assessing their value to the academic community
View through CrossRef
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the development of institutional repositories in New Zealand, exploring factors affecting the adoption and success of institutional repositories from the perspective of the library managers who established them, and from the perspective of the academic community.Design/methodology/approachData from a series of interviews with library managers are compared with the findings from a randomised national survey of academics.FindingsThe responses of the library managers suggest that they are positive about the value of their institutional repository, and the progress made towards recruiting content for it. Data from the survey of academics indicate that academics have been slow to embrace the concept of institutional repositories, and show little interest in using repositories for increasing the accessibility of their own work, or to access the work of others. The number of deposits remains low, mirroring patterns throughout the world, and subject or disciplinary repositories appear to have greater value to the academic community.Practical implicationsThe future long‐term sustainability of institutional repositories depends on gaining a stronger commitment from the academic community, or developing different goals, against which their success might be measured.Originality/valueThe study is the first random survey of academic staff across all disciplines, and an entire country, and the findings have a very high level of generalisability.
Title: Institutional repositories: assessing their value to the academic community
Description:
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the development of institutional repositories in New Zealand, exploring factors affecting the adoption and success of institutional repositories from the perspective of the library managers who established them, and from the perspective of the academic community.
Design/methodology/approachData from a series of interviews with library managers are compared with the findings from a randomised national survey of academics.
FindingsThe responses of the library managers suggest that they are positive about the value of their institutional repository, and the progress made towards recruiting content for it.
Data from the survey of academics indicate that academics have been slow to embrace the concept of institutional repositories, and show little interest in using repositories for increasing the accessibility of their own work, or to access the work of others.
The number of deposits remains low, mirroring patterns throughout the world, and subject or disciplinary repositories appear to have greater value to the academic community.
Practical implicationsThe future long‐term sustainability of institutional repositories depends on gaining a stronger commitment from the academic community, or developing different goals, against which their success might be measured.
Originality/valueThe study is the first random survey of academic staff across all disciplines, and an entire country, and the findings have a very high level of generalisability.
Related Results
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Towards Transparent Presentation of FAIR-enabling Data Repository Functions & Characteristics
Towards Transparent Presentation of FAIR-enabling Data Repository Functions & Characteristics
Identifying, finding and gaining a sufficient overview of the functions and characteristics of data repositories and their catalogues is essential for users of data repositories an...
Measuring the Usage of Repositories via a National Standards-based Aggregation Service: IRUS-UK
Measuring the Usage of Repositories via a National Standards-based Aggregation Service: IRUS-UK
Many educational institutions have repositories for research outputs. The number of items available through institutional repositories is growing, and is expected to continue to do...
Institutional varieties and entrepreneurship: an empirical analysis
Institutional varieties and entrepreneurship: an empirical analysis
A growing body of literature on comparative international entrepreneurship has focussed on exploring the factors that explain differences in entrepreneurial activity across countri...
Mediating Effects of Academic Stress between Resilience and Academic Achievement: On the University Students majoring in Piano and Vocal Music
Mediating Effects of Academic Stress between Resilience and Academic Achievement: On the University Students majoring in Piano and Vocal Music
This study finds out the structural relationship among resilience, academic stress, and academic achievement for university students majoring in piano and vocal music and verifies ...
Open Access Medical Repositories: Status and Development Trends
Open Access Medical Repositories: Status and Development Trends
The issue of reflecting the scientific achievements of individual scientists and the results of research activities of research teams in the information environment is of great imp...
Institutional innovations for improved water security in smallholder irrigation schemes in KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape Provinces, South Africa
Institutional innovations for improved water security in smallholder irrigation schemes in KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape Provinces, South Africa
Smallholder irrigation schemes are regarded as a key strategy to eliminate poverty and increase food security in rural areas in South Africa. While the South African government has...
Harmonization and streamlining of research oversight for pragmatic clinical trials
Harmonization and streamlining of research oversight for pragmatic clinical trials
The oversight of research involving human participants is a complex process that requires institutional review board review as well as multiple non-institutional review board insti...

