Javascript must be enabled to continue!
An Evaluation of the Chester County (PA) Drug Court Program
View through CrossRef
The Chester County (PA) Drug Court Program was implemented in October of 1997. By the end of January of 1999, 184 drug offenders had participated in the program. This evaluation of the Chester County Drug Court Program compares the 184 drug court participants to 51 comparable offenders who were placed on probation at some point between December 1996 and September 1997. These comparison subjects were selected based upon the drug court program eligibility criteria (i.e., offenders charged with non-mandatory drug offenses; offenders not under probation or parole supervision when charged with drug offenses; and no prior record for violent offenses). Drug court and comparison samples were compared in terms of current status, new arrests, revocation/removal from program, and drug testing results. Findings reveal a lower rate of positive results for drug tests taken by the drug court participants as compared to the comparison group. Similarly, there was a lower rate of rearrest during the program among the drug court sample than among the comparison sample. On the other hand, drug court participants were more likely than the comparison group to be unsuccessfully removed from their programs. Survival analysis revealed that the differences in the survival patterns of the drug court and comparison samples approached statistical significance. Additionally, African American drug court participants appeared to do significantly poorer than Caucasian drug court participants. Those drug court graduates for whom follow-up data (n=15) were available appear to be successful in leading productive and drug-free lives.
Title: An Evaluation of the Chester County (PA) Drug Court Program
Description:
The Chester County (PA) Drug Court Program was implemented in October of 1997.
By the end of January of 1999, 184 drug offenders had participated in the program.
This evaluation of the Chester County Drug Court Program compares the 184 drug court participants to 51 comparable offenders who were placed on probation at some point between December 1996 and September 1997.
These comparison subjects were selected based upon the drug court program eligibility criteria (i.
e.
, offenders charged with non-mandatory drug offenses; offenders not under probation or parole supervision when charged with drug offenses; and no prior record for violent offenses).
Drug court and comparison samples were compared in terms of current status, new arrests, revocation/removal from program, and drug testing results.
Findings reveal a lower rate of positive results for drug tests taken by the drug court participants as compared to the comparison group.
Similarly, there was a lower rate of rearrest during the program among the drug court sample than among the comparison sample.
On the other hand, drug court participants were more likely than the comparison group to be unsuccessfully removed from their programs.
Survival analysis revealed that the differences in the survival patterns of the drug court and comparison samples approached statistical significance.
Additionally, African American drug court participants appeared to do significantly poorer than Caucasian drug court participants.
Those drug court graduates for whom follow-up data (n=15) were available appear to be successful in leading productive and drug-free lives.
Related Results
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
To Ban or Not to Ban : The Supreme Court and Obscenity
To Ban or Not to Ban : The Supreme Court and Obscenity
Since 1957, the United States Supreme Court has exhibited a marked shift in its attitude toward freedom of expression. This shift may be directly attributed to changes in the Court...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Unification of Ellsworth County School Districts
Unification of Ellsworth County School Districts
The purpose of this study was to propose a plan for the unification of school districts in Ellsworth County Kansas to equalize the burden of school support and educational benefits...
"Best Tradition": CREATE, JCSEE and the Program Evaluation Standards
"Best Tradition": CREATE, JCSEE and the Program Evaluation Standards
Background: Evaluation “is a task in the best tradition of the most abstract theoretical science as well as the most practical applied science” (Scriven, 1968, p .9). The Program E...
Potential drug–drug interactions and associated factors among hospitalized cardiac patients at Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia
Potential drug–drug interactions and associated factors among hospitalized cardiac patients at Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia
Background: Concomitant use of several drugs for a patient is often imposing increased risk of drug–drug interactions. Drug–drug interactions are a major cause for concern in patie...
Study on the Prediction of Runoff Usability in Kaihua County
Study on the Prediction of Runoff Usability in Kaihua County
Small hydropower is an important infrastructure for people's livelihoods and clean renewable energy, but there are still many weak links in the planning, design, construction, oper...
The Principle of Appeals on Points of Law
The Principle of Appeals on Points of Law
Regarding the structure of criminal appeals, the judicial precedent establishes the principle of ‘appeals on points of fact,’ which stipulates that the court of the second instance...


