Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The effect of tennis on male bone mineral density: A meta-analysis

View through CrossRef
Background As an asymmetrical sport, tennis positively influences the increase of bone mineral density (BMD) in adolescents. However, most current studies focus on specific body regions, there is a lack of systematic analysis of the impact of tennis on BMD in various parts of the body. Therefore, this study aims to systematically assess the impact of tennis on BMD in different areas of the body. Objective This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of tennis on BMD in males. Methods Comprehensive search was conducted across databases including Web of Science, PubMed, CNKI, and Embase to identify high-quality randomized controlled trials examining the effects of tennis on BMD. The search covered literature from database inception to March 2025. Data were screened, extracted, coded, and statistically analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Study selection was based on the PICOS criteria: (i) male tennis players compared to non-tennis players of the same age; (ii) tennis intervention group versus groups engaging in other regular physical activities; (iii) outcome indicators included bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD; and (iv) study design included cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, or controlled experiments. Result A total of 10 articles involving 761 male participants aged between 10 and 26 were included in the analysis. Tennis intervention was found to significantly improve bone measures in several areas. Specifically, it led to increases in dominant arm BMC (SMD = 0.57 mg/mm, 95% CI [0.01, 1.13], P = 0.04), lumbar spine BMD (MD = 0.10 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.08, 0.11], P < 0.00001), dominant arm and radius BMD (SMD = 1.34 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.49, 2.80], P = 0.002), and right femur BMD (MD = 0.10 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.02, 0.18], P = 0.02). These differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conversely, tennis had no significant effect on whole-body BMC (MD = 25.51 mg/mm, 95% CI [-38.43, 85.35], P = 0.43), non-dominant arm BMC (SMD = 0.03 mg/mm, 95% CI [-0.31, 0.37], P = 0.88), total body BMD (MD = 0.00 g/cm2, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.01], P = 0.97), femoral neck BMD (MD = 0.01 g/cm2, 95% CI [-0.00, 0.01], P = 0.30), or left femur BMD (MD = -0.01 g/cm2, 95% CI [-0.07, 0.05], P = 0.84). These findings were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Additionally, subgroup analyses further revealed that tennis training exerted a targeted impact on BMD. Training durations of more than 7 years and at least 15 hours per week significantly improved BMD in the dominant arm and radius. Additionally, significant improvements in the non-dominant arm and radius BMD were observed in participants with over 2 years of training experience. Enhancement of greater trochanter BMD was closely associated with age of training initiation, with significant improvements noted when training began after age 15. In contrast, tennis had minimal influence on femoral neck BMD. Conclusion Tennis effectively enhances BMD in the dominant arm, radius, lumbar spine, greater trochanter, and right lower limb. The effects are asymmetrical, favoring the dominant side. Therefore, to maintain balanced development of BMC and BMD in both limbs, it is recommended to include contralateral (non-dominant side) training during tennis practice. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/identifier: CRD42023486547. Registration date: March 10, 2025.
Title: The effect of tennis on male bone mineral density: A meta-analysis
Description:
Background As an asymmetrical sport, tennis positively influences the increase of bone mineral density (BMD) in adolescents.
However, most current studies focus on specific body regions, there is a lack of systematic analysis of the impact of tennis on BMD in various parts of the body.
Therefore, this study aims to systematically assess the impact of tennis on BMD in different areas of the body.
Objective This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of tennis on BMD in males.
Methods Comprehensive search was conducted across databases including Web of Science, PubMed, CNKI, and Embase to identify high-quality randomized controlled trials examining the effects of tennis on BMD.
The search covered literature from database inception to March 2025.
Data were screened, extracted, coded, and statistically analyzed using Review Manager 5.
3.
Study selection was based on the PICOS criteria: (i) male tennis players compared to non-tennis players of the same age; (ii) tennis intervention group versus groups engaging in other regular physical activities; (iii) outcome indicators included bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD; and (iv) study design included cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, or controlled experiments.
Result A total of 10 articles involving 761 male participants aged between 10 and 26 were included in the analysis.
Tennis intervention was found to significantly improve bone measures in several areas.
Specifically, it led to increases in dominant arm BMC (SMD = 0.
57 mg/mm, 95% CI [0.
01, 1.
13], P = 0.
04), lumbar spine BMD (MD = 0.
10 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.
08, 0.
11], P < 0.
00001), dominant arm and radius BMD (SMD = 1.
34 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.
49, 2.
80], P = 0.
002), and right femur BMD (MD = 0.
10 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.
02, 0.
18], P = 0.
02).
These differences were statistically significant (P < 0.
05).
Conversely, tennis had no significant effect on whole-body BMC (MD = 25.
51 mg/mm, 95% CI [-38.
43, 85.
35], P = 0.
43), non-dominant arm BMC (SMD = 0.
03 mg/mm, 95% CI [-0.
31, 0.
37], P = 0.
88), total body BMD (MD = 0.
00 g/cm2, 95% CI [-0.
01, 0.
01], P = 0.
97), femoral neck BMD (MD = 0.
01 g/cm2, 95% CI [-0.
00, 0.
01], P = 0.
30), or left femur BMD (MD = -0.
01 g/cm2, 95% CI [-0.
07, 0.
05], P = 0.
84).
These findings were not statistically significant (P > 0.
05).
Additionally, subgroup analyses further revealed that tennis training exerted a targeted impact on BMD.
Training durations of more than 7 years and at least 15 hours per week significantly improved BMD in the dominant arm and radius.
Additionally, significant improvements in the non-dominant arm and radius BMD were observed in participants with over 2 years of training experience.
Enhancement of greater trochanter BMD was closely associated with age of training initiation, with significant improvements noted when training began after age 15.
In contrast, tennis had minimal influence on femoral neck BMD.
Conclusion Tennis effectively enhances BMD in the dominant arm, radius, lumbar spine, greater trochanter, and right lower limb.
The effects are asymmetrical, favoring the dominant side.
Therefore, to maintain balanced development of BMC and BMD in both limbs, it is recommended to include contralateral (non-dominant side) training during tennis practice.
Systematic review registration https://www.
crd.
york.
ac.
uk/PROSPERO/identifier: CRD42023486547.
Registration date: March 10, 2025.

Related Results

Poster 107: The Use of Coacervate Sustained Release System to Identify the Most Potent BMP for Bone Regeneration
Poster 107: The Use of Coacervate Sustained Release System to Identify the Most Potent BMP for Bone Regeneration
Objectives: Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) belong to the transforming growth factor superfamily that were first discovered by Marshall Urist. There are 14 BMPs identified to da...
Performance level discriminative validity of agility tests in youth tennis players
Performance level discriminative validity of agility tests in youth tennis players
IntroductionVarious studies have shown that the ability to change the direction of movement quickly plays an important role in achieving top performance in tennis. The main goal of...
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED]Rhino XL Reviews, NY USA: Studies show that testosterone levels in males decrease constantly with growing age. There are also many other problems that males face due ...
P2-17-06: Patterns of Bone Density Evaluation in a Community Population Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors.
P2-17-06: Patterns of Bone Density Evaluation in a Community Population Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors.
Abstract Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) lead to an increased risk of bone loss and fracture. Fracture rates in adjuvant AI studies have ranged from 2.3% to 11%, with hig...
Energetics of Table Tennis and Table Tennis–Specific Exercise Testing
Energetics of Table Tennis and Table Tennis–Specific Exercise Testing
Purpose:To test the hypotheses that the metabolic profile of table tennis is dominantly aerobic, anaerobic energy is related to the accumulated duration and intensity of rallies, a...
The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Table Tennis Motivation at the UPI Table Tennis Student Activity Unit, Sumedang Campus
The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Table Tennis Motivation at the UPI Table Tennis Student Activity Unit, Sumedang Campus
This research is motivated by the experience of field findings. In the findings of researchers at the UPI Sumedang table tennis UKM, there were often UKM members who were lazing ab...
The irradiated human mandible
The irradiated human mandible
Mandibular bone is known to be susceptible to irradiation damage, especially when radiation dose exceeds 50 Gy. This can result in compromised wound healing and ultimately osteorad...
Does Forehand Racquet Handgrip influence Incidence and Type of Wrist Injury in Tennis? A Preliminary Study in Indian Tennis
Does Forehand Racquet Handgrip influence Incidence and Type of Wrist Injury in Tennis? A Preliminary Study in Indian Tennis
ABSTRACT Introduction Tennis is one of the major global sports, with over 75 million players participating in the game in more than 200 countries affiliated with the International...

Back to Top