Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The peridynamic model of viscoelastic creep and recovery

View through CrossRef
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to establish a peridynamic method in predicting viscoelastic creep behaviour with recovery stage and to find the suitable numerical parameters of peridynamic method. Design/methodology/approach – A rheological viscoelastic creep constitutive equation including recovery and an elastic peridynamic equation (with integral basis) are examined and used. The elasticity equation within the peridynamic equation is replaced by the viscoelastic equation. A new peridynamic method with two time parameters, i.e. numerical time and viscoelastic real time is designed. The two parameters of peridynamic method, horizon radius and number of nodes per unit volume are studied to get their optimal values. In validating this peridynamic method, comparisons are made between numerical and analytical result and between numerical and experimental data. Findings – The new peridynamic method for viscoelastic creep behaviour is approved by the good matching in numerical-analytical data comparison with difference of < 0.1 per cent and in numerical-experimental data comparison with difference of 4-6 per cent. It can be used for further creep test which may include non-linear viscoelastic behaviour and creep rupture. From this paper, the variation of constants in Burger’s viscoelastic model is also studied and groups of constants values that can simulate solid, fluid and solid-fluid viscoelastic behaviours were obtained. In addition, the numerical peridynamic parameters were also manipulated and examined to achieve the optimal values of the parameters. Research limitations/implications – The peridynamic model of viscoelastic creep behaviour preferably should have only one time parameter. This can only be done by solving the unstable fluctuation of dynamic results, which is not discussed in this paper. Another limitation is the tertiary region and creep rupture are not included in this paper. Practical implications – The viscoelastic peridynamic model in this paper can serve as an alternative for conventional numerical simulations in viscoelastic area. This model also is the initial step of developing peridynamic model of viscoelastic creep rupture properties (crack initiation, crack propagation, crack branching, etc.), where this future model has high potential in predicting failure behaviours of any components, tools or structures, and hence increase safety and reduce loss. Originality/value – The application of viscoelastic creep constitutive model on peridynamic formulation, effect of peridynamic parameters manipulation on numerical result, and optimization of constants of viscoelastic model in simulating three types of viscoelastic creep behaviours.
Title: The peridynamic model of viscoelastic creep and recovery
Description:
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to establish a peridynamic method in predicting viscoelastic creep behaviour with recovery stage and to find the suitable numerical parameters of peridynamic method.
Design/methodology/approach – A rheological viscoelastic creep constitutive equation including recovery and an elastic peridynamic equation (with integral basis) are examined and used.
The elasticity equation within the peridynamic equation is replaced by the viscoelastic equation.
A new peridynamic method with two time parameters, i.
e.
numerical time and viscoelastic real time is designed.
The two parameters of peridynamic method, horizon radius and number of nodes per unit volume are studied to get their optimal values.
In validating this peridynamic method, comparisons are made between numerical and analytical result and between numerical and experimental data.
Findings – The new peridynamic method for viscoelastic creep behaviour is approved by the good matching in numerical-analytical data comparison with difference of < 0.
1 per cent and in numerical-experimental data comparison with difference of 4-6 per cent.
It can be used for further creep test which may include non-linear viscoelastic behaviour and creep rupture.
From this paper, the variation of constants in Burger’s viscoelastic model is also studied and groups of constants values that can simulate solid, fluid and solid-fluid viscoelastic behaviours were obtained.
In addition, the numerical peridynamic parameters were also manipulated and examined to achieve the optimal values of the parameters.
Research limitations/implications – The peridynamic model of viscoelastic creep behaviour preferably should have only one time parameter.
This can only be done by solving the unstable fluctuation of dynamic results, which is not discussed in this paper.
Another limitation is the tertiary region and creep rupture are not included in this paper.
Practical implications – The viscoelastic peridynamic model in this paper can serve as an alternative for conventional numerical simulations in viscoelastic area.
This model also is the initial step of developing peridynamic model of viscoelastic creep rupture properties (crack initiation, crack propagation, crack branching, etc.
), where this future model has high potential in predicting failure behaviours of any components, tools or structures, and hence increase safety and reduce loss.
Originality/value – The application of viscoelastic creep constitutive model on peridynamic formulation, effect of peridynamic parameters manipulation on numerical result, and optimization of constants of viscoelastic model in simulating three types of viscoelastic creep behaviours.

Related Results

The compressive creep of rockfill
The compressive creep of rockfill
Abstract Multistage constant stress rates loading-creep tests were carried out on air-dried slate rockfill. The influences of the loading history on the creep deformation o...
Identifying 2000 small and large creep events on the San Andreas Fault.
Identifying 2000 small and large creep events on the San Andreas Fault.
&lt;p&gt;The San Andreas fault has been observed to creep at the surface along the 175km section between San Juan Bautista and Cholame (Titus et al., 2011). This section is...
A Fractional Order Creep Damage Model for Microbially Improved Expansive Soils
A Fractional Order Creep Damage Model for Microbially Improved Expansive Soils
Microbial Induced Calcite Precipitation method was used to improve the expansive soils of Nanning, Guangxi. The nonlinear shear creep behavior of microbially improved expansive soi...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Damage and hardening evolution characteristics of sandstone under multilevel creep–fatigue loading
Damage and hardening evolution characteristics of sandstone under multilevel creep–fatigue loading
AbstractDuring the operation of artificial underground structures, the surrounding rock experiences fatigue and creep damage caused by several types of disturbances under long-term...
Elastic and viscoelastic behaviour of sandwich panels with glass-fibre reinforced polymer faces and polyethylene terephthalate foam core
Elastic and viscoelastic behaviour of sandwich panels with glass-fibre reinforced polymer faces and polyethylene terephthalate foam core
This paper presents experimental and analytical investigations about the elastic and viscoelastic (creep) behaviour of sandwich panels made of glass-fibre reinforced polymer faces ...
An Improved Mechanism-Based Creep Constitutive Model Using Stress-Dependent Creep Ductility
An Improved Mechanism-Based Creep Constitutive Model Using Stress-Dependent Creep Ductility
Creep ductility which is assumed to be constant at a given temperature in many creep constitutive models, actually varies with temperature, stress level and creep strain rate, etc....

Back to Top