Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Categorization of Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Using Disease Activity, Patient-Reported Outcomes and Transcriptomic Signatures

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objective Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) display symptoms that are not always related to disease activity and may distort clinical trial results. Recently, a clinical categorization based on the presence of type 1 (inflammatory manifestations) and/or type 2 (widespread pain, fatigue, depression) symptoms has been proposed in SLE. Our aim was to develop a type 2 score derived from the Short-Form health survey (SF-36) to categorize SLE patients and to compare immunological and transcriptomic profiles between groups. Methods Seventeen items from the SF-36 were selected to build a type 2 score for 50 SLE patients (100 visits; LUPUCE cohort) and the SLEDAI was used to define type 1 symptoms. Patients were categorized in four groups: minimal (no symptoms), type 1, type 2 and mixed (both type 1 and type 2 symptoms). Clinical, immunological and transcriptomic profiles were compared between the groups. Results Type 2 scores ranged from 0 to 31, with a cut-off value of 14 (75th percentile). The sample categorization was: minimal in 39%, type 1 in 37%, type 2 in 9% and mixed in 15%. Type 2 patients were older than minimal patients and had a longer disease duration than type 1 and mixed patients. Immunological data and modular interferon signatures did not differ between the groups. Conclusion Patients with SLE can be categorized into four clinical groups using the SLEDAI score and our SF-36-derived type 2 score. This categorization is non-redundant with immunological or transcriptomic profiles and could prove useful to stratify patients in clinical trials.
Title: Categorization of Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Using Disease Activity, Patient-Reported Outcomes and Transcriptomic Signatures
Description:
Abstract Objective Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) display symptoms that are not always related to disease activity and may distort clinical trial results.
Recently, a clinical categorization based on the presence of type 1 (inflammatory manifestations) and/or type 2 (widespread pain, fatigue, depression) symptoms has been proposed in SLE.
Our aim was to develop a type 2 score derived from the Short-Form health survey (SF-36) to categorize SLE patients and to compare immunological and transcriptomic profiles between groups.
Methods Seventeen items from the SF-36 were selected to build a type 2 score for 50 SLE patients (100 visits; LUPUCE cohort) and the SLEDAI was used to define type 1 symptoms.
Patients were categorized in four groups: minimal (no symptoms), type 1, type 2 and mixed (both type 1 and type 2 symptoms).
Clinical, immunological and transcriptomic profiles were compared between the groups.
Results Type 2 scores ranged from 0 to 31, with a cut-off value of 14 (75th percentile).
The sample categorization was: minimal in 39%, type 1 in 37%, type 2 in 9% and mixed in 15%.
Type 2 patients were older than minimal patients and had a longer disease duration than type 1 and mixed patients.
Immunological data and modular interferon signatures did not differ between the groups.
Conclusion Patients with SLE can be categorized into four clinical groups using the SLEDAI score and our SF-36-derived type 2 score.
This categorization is non-redundant with immunological or transcriptomic profiles and could prove useful to stratify patients in clinical trials.

Related Results

Spectrum of cutaneous lupus erythematosus in South Africans with systemic lupus erythematosus
Spectrum of cutaneous lupus erythematosus in South Africans with systemic lupus erythematosus
Background Cutaneous involvement is very common in systemic lupus erythematosus. We describe the prevalence and spectrum of lupus-specific (cutaneous lupus erythematosus) and non-s...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Three in One: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, HELLP Syndrome, and Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review
Three in One: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, HELLP Syndrome, and Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disease commonly affecting women of reproductive age. Its overlap with HELLP syndrome (Hemolysi...
The co-occurrence of Kikuchi–Fujimoto disease and systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report
The co-occurrence of Kikuchi–Fujimoto disease and systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report
Abstract Background Kikuchi–Fujimoto disease is an uncommon systemic disease that mostly affects young women. Kikuchi–Fujimoto disease typically man...

Back to Top