Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Chirality Induction in a Hydrophilic Metallohelicate
View through CrossRef
AbstractThe title compound is a water‐soluble triply stranded metallohelicate 1Fe composed of TEG‐chain‐installed calix[4]arene‐based bis‐bidentate ligands and Fe3+ cations. This compound can incorporate up to two molecules of small chiral cations (G1 and G2). Interestingly, G1 shows positive cooperativity for host‐guest complexation, whereas G2 exhibits noncooperativity, despite having a greater affinity for 1Fe than G1. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations indicate the metallohelicate cavity expands upon encapsulation of the first guest. This conformational change facilitates the entrapment of the second guest and explains why the interaction parameters of G1 and G2 are larger than 1, despite electrostatic repulsion between the guests. The DFT calculation predicts an intermolecular interaction between the phenyl groups of G1 in the cavity, whereas no such interaction is found for G2. This difference can explain the distinct molecular recognition of G1 and G2. CD spectroscopy shows that both (R)‐G1 and (R)‐G2 induce (M)‐helicity in 1Fe and vice versa. DFT calculations suggest that the chirality of the guests is transmitted to 1Fe via CH/O hydrogen bonds between the guest and the C=O bond on the calix[4]arene strand. The CD intensity of 1Fe is nonlinear in the ee% of (R)‐ and (S)‐G1, indicating that the presence of the first guest increases the affinity of 1Fe toward a second guest with the same chirality due to preorganization by the first guest.
Title: Chirality Induction in a Hydrophilic Metallohelicate
Description:
AbstractThe title compound is a water‐soluble triply stranded metallohelicate 1Fe composed of TEG‐chain‐installed calix[4]arene‐based bis‐bidentate ligands and Fe3+ cations.
This compound can incorporate up to two molecules of small chiral cations (G1 and G2).
Interestingly, G1 shows positive cooperativity for host‐guest complexation, whereas G2 exhibits noncooperativity, despite having a greater affinity for 1Fe than G1.
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations indicate the metallohelicate cavity expands upon encapsulation of the first guest.
This conformational change facilitates the entrapment of the second guest and explains why the interaction parameters of G1 and G2 are larger than 1, despite electrostatic repulsion between the guests.
The DFT calculation predicts an intermolecular interaction between the phenyl groups of G1 in the cavity, whereas no such interaction is found for G2.
This difference can explain the distinct molecular recognition of G1 and G2.
CD spectroscopy shows that both (R)‐G1 and (R)‐G2 induce (M)‐helicity in 1Fe and vice versa.
DFT calculations suggest that the chirality of the guests is transmitted to 1Fe via CH/O hydrogen bonds between the guest and the C=O bond on the calix[4]arene strand.
The CD intensity of 1Fe is nonlinear in the ee% of (R)‐ and (S)‐G1, indicating that the presence of the first guest increases the affinity of 1Fe toward a second guest with the same chirality due to preorganization by the first guest.
Related Results
Outcomes Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for AML in First Completion Remission Are Comparable between MRD Negative Patients and MRD Positive Patients Receiving Induction Only and Are Superior to MRD Positive Patients Receiving Induction and
Outcomes Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for AML in First Completion Remission Are Comparable between MRD Negative Patients and MRD Positive Patients Receiving Induction Only and Are Superior to MRD Positive Patients Receiving Induction and
Background:
Data suggests that the presence of measurable residual disease (MRD) at the time of transplant for AML portends a poor prognosis. The timing of MRD asses...
Functional Chirality: From Small Molecules to Supramolecular Assemblies
Functional Chirality: From Small Molecules to Supramolecular Assemblies
Many structures in nature look symmetric, but this is not completely accurate, because absolute symmetry is close to death. Chirality (handedness) is one form of living asymmetry. ...
Molecular chirality quantification: Tools and benchmarks
Molecular chirality quantification: Tools and benchmarks
Molecular chirality has traditionally been viewed as a binary property where a molecule is classified as either chiral or achiral, yet in recent decades, mathematical methods for q...
Chirality and Chiroptical Properties of Amyloid Fibrils
Chirality and Chiroptical Properties of Amyloid Fibrils
ABSTRACTChirality of amyloid fibrils‐linear beta‐sheet‐rich aggregates of misfolded protein chains‐often manifests in morphological traits such as helical twist visible in atomic f...
Advances in Chirality Sensing with Macrocyclic Molecules
Advances in Chirality Sensing with Macrocyclic Molecules
The construction of chemical sensors that can distinguish molecular chirality has attracted increasing attention in recent years due to the significance of chiral organic molecules...
A web site for calculating the degree of chirality
A web site for calculating the degree of chirality
AbstractThe web site, http://www.csm.huji.ac.il/, uses the Continuous Chirality Measure to evaluate quantitatively the degree of chirality of a molecule, a structure, a fragment. T...
Design and Asymmetric Synthesis of Unnatural Amino Acid Derivatives Showing Staircase and Orientational Chirality
Design and Asymmetric Synthesis of Unnatural Amino Acid Derivatives Showing Staircase and Orientational Chirality
AbstractAmino acids are basic building blocks of peptides and proteins, which play essential roles in biological processes. Unnatural chiral amino acids have been proven to be powe...
Hydrophobic surface protein masking by the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans
Hydrophobic surface protein masking by the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans
Ultrastructural and biochemical analyses of hydrophobic and hydrophilic yeast cell surface proteins of Candida albicans were performed. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic yeast cells were...

