Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Impact of Interfractional Error on Dosiomic Features

View through CrossRef
ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate the stability of dosiomic features under random interfractional error. We investigated the differences in the values of features with different fractions and the error in the values of dosiomic features under interfractional error.Material and MethodsThe isocenters of the treatment plans of 15 lung cancer patients were translated by a maximum of ±3 mm in each axis with a mean of (0, 0, 0) and a standard deviation of (1.2, 1.2, 1.2) mm in the x, y, and z directions for each fraction. A total of 81 dose distributions for each patient were then calculated considering four fraction number groups (2, 10, 20, and 30). A total of 93 dosiomic features were extracted from each dose distribution in four different regions of interest (ROIs): gross tumor volume (GTV), planning target volume (PTV), heart, and both lungs. The stability of dosiomic features was analyzed for each fraction number group by the coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreements in the means of dosiomic features among the four fraction number groups were tested by ICC. The percent differences (PD) between the dosiomic features extracted from the original dose distribution and the dosiomic features extracted from the dose distribution with interfractional error were calculated.ResultsEleven out of 93 dosiomic features demonstrated a large CV (CV ≥ 20%). Overall CV values were highest in GTV ROIs and lowest in lung ROIs. The stability of dosiomic features decreased as the total number of fractions decreased. The ICC results showed that five out of 93 dosiomic features had an ICC lower than 0.75, which indicates intermediate or poor stability under interfractional error. The mean dosiomic feature values were shown to be consistent with different numbers of fractions (ICC ≥ 0.9). Some of the dosiomic features had PD greater than 50% and showed different PD values with different numbers of fractions.ConclusionSome dosiomic features have low stability under interfractional error. The stability and values of the dosiomic features were affected by the total number of fractions. The effect of interfractional error on dosiomic features should be considered in further studies regarding dosiomics for reproducible results.
Title: Impact of Interfractional Error on Dosiomic Features
Description:
ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate the stability of dosiomic features under random interfractional error.
We investigated the differences in the values of features with different fractions and the error in the values of dosiomic features under interfractional error.
Material and MethodsThe isocenters of the treatment plans of 15 lung cancer patients were translated by a maximum of ±3 mm in each axis with a mean of (0, 0, 0) and a standard deviation of (1.
2, 1.
2, 1.
2) mm in the x, y, and z directions for each fraction.
A total of 81 dose distributions for each patient were then calculated considering four fraction number groups (2, 10, 20, and 30).
A total of 93 dosiomic features were extracted from each dose distribution in four different regions of interest (ROIs): gross tumor volume (GTV), planning target volume (PTV), heart, and both lungs.
The stability of dosiomic features was analyzed for each fraction number group by the coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
The agreements in the means of dosiomic features among the four fraction number groups were tested by ICC.
The percent differences (PD) between the dosiomic features extracted from the original dose distribution and the dosiomic features extracted from the dose distribution with interfractional error were calculated.
ResultsEleven out of 93 dosiomic features demonstrated a large CV (CV ≥ 20%).
Overall CV values were highest in GTV ROIs and lowest in lung ROIs.
The stability of dosiomic features decreased as the total number of fractions decreased.
The ICC results showed that five out of 93 dosiomic features had an ICC lower than 0.
75, which indicates intermediate or poor stability under interfractional error.
The mean dosiomic feature values were shown to be consistent with different numbers of fractions (ICC ≥ 0.
9).
Some of the dosiomic features had PD greater than 50% and showed different PD values with different numbers of fractions.
ConclusionSome dosiomic features have low stability under interfractional error.
The stability and values of the dosiomic features were affected by the total number of fractions.
The effect of interfractional error on dosiomic features should be considered in further studies regarding dosiomics for reproducible results.

Related Results

Radiomic and Dosiomic Features for the Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis Across Esophageal Cancer and Lung Cancer
Radiomic and Dosiomic Features for the Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis Across Esophageal Cancer and Lung Cancer
PurposeThe aim was to investigate the advantages of dosiomic and radiomic features over traditional dose-volume histogram (DVH) features for predicting the development of radiation...
Biological dosiomic features for the prediction of radiation pneumonitis in esophageal cancer patients
Biological dosiomic features for the prediction of radiation pneumonitis in esophageal cancer patients
Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to develop a model using dose volume histogram (DVH) and dosiomic features to predict the risk of r...
Classification of Bisyllabic Lexical Stress Patterns Using Deep Neural Networks
Classification of Bisyllabic Lexical Stress Patterns Using Deep Neural Networks
Background and Objectives: As English is a stress-timed language, lexical stress plays an important role in the perception and processing of speech by native speakers. Incorrect st...
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Smart manufacturing has been developed since the introduction of Industry 4.0. It consists of resource sharing and networking, predictive engineering, and material and data analyti...
Global component analysis of errors in five satellite-only global precipitation estimates
Global component analysis of errors in five satellite-only global precipitation estimates
Abstract. Revealing the error components for satellite-only precipitation products (SPPs) can help algorithm developers and end-users substantially understand their error features ...
Dynamic stochastic modeling for inertial sensors
Dynamic stochastic modeling for inertial sensors
Es ampliamente conocido que los modelos de error para sensores inerciales tienen dos componentes: El primero es un componente determinista que normalmente es calibrado por el fabri...
Errors
Errors
When we compare study group/s with a control group in a research, there can be ‘errors’. Error is the difference between the ‘fact’ and our ‘finding’. In other words, error is the ...
Linear Regression to Minimize the Total Error of the Numerical Differentiation
Linear Regression to Minimize the Total Error of the Numerical Differentiation
AbstractIt is well known that numerical derivative contains two types of errors. One is truncation error and the other is rounding error. By evaluating variables with rounding erro...

Back to Top