Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Effectiveness of Microdosing in Comparison to Broadcasting and Banding Vermicompost Application for Maize (Zea mays L.) Production in Smallholder Farming of Semiarid Tigray Region of Ethiopia
View through CrossRef
Optimizing organic fertilizer recommendations can be cost‐effective and affordable for resource‐poor farmers by increasing crop yield and income. This field experiment was conducted to determine the most effective vermicompost application method for enhancing maize production in the Laelay Adiyabo district (Chiraro, Gudelo, and Hibret experimental sites) of Tigray, Ethiopia, during the 2019 growing season. The experiment employed seven treatments: the control, broadcasting of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost, banding of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost, banding of prescribed chemical fertilizer (150 kg NPSZnB ha−1 + 38.5 kg N ha−1), and three treatments of vermicompost microdosing (2, 4, and 6 t ha−1). The treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Results showed that when plots received prescribed chemical fertilizer of 150 kg NPSZnB ha−1 plus 38.5 kg N ha−1 compared to the control treatment, average stover yields of the experimental sites increased by 81.68% for Chiraro site, 50.38% for Gudelo site, and 65.88% for Hibret site. Microdose application of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost increased stover yield by an average of 66.70% at Chiraro site, 43.44% at Gudelo site, and 62.44% at Hibret site compared to the control treatment. Grain yields increased by 108.37%, 37.16%, and 26.85% at Chiraro site, 97.27%, 57.80%, and 47.69% at Gudelo site, and 104.13%, 75.61%, and 57.99% at Hibret site when plots received the recommended chemical fertilizer of 150 kg NPSZnB ha−1 plus 38.5 kg N ha−1 compared to the control treatment, microdose application of 2 t ha−1 vermicompost and broadcast application of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost, respectively. The microdose application of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost increased grain yield by 88.63%, 24.16%, and 14.83% at Chiraro; 74.18%, 39.33%, and 30.41% at Gudelo; and 61.82%, 39.22%, and 25.25% at Hibret compared to the control treatment, microdose application of 2 t ha−1 vermicompost, and broadcast application of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost. At all study sites, applying the recommended chemical fertilizer of 150 kg NPSZnB ha−1 + 38.5 kg N ha−1 to maize crop plots, followed by microdose application of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost, resulted in improved agronomic yield, maximum net benefits, and marginal rate of returns. Based on the agronomic and economic analysis results, the optimal fertilizer rate for maize production was determined to be 150 kg NPSZnB ha−1 plus 38.5 kg N ha−1. For resource‐poor farmers who cannot afford chemical fertilizers, applying microdoses of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost instead of broadcasting or banded application of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost could be beneficial and used as an alternative to chemical fertilizer for maize production.
Title: Effectiveness of Microdosing in Comparison to Broadcasting and Banding Vermicompost Application for Maize (Zea mays L.) Production in Smallholder Farming of Semiarid Tigray Region of Ethiopia
Description:
Optimizing organic fertilizer recommendations can be cost‐effective and affordable for resource‐poor farmers by increasing crop yield and income.
This field experiment was conducted to determine the most effective vermicompost application method for enhancing maize production in the Laelay Adiyabo district (Chiraro, Gudelo, and Hibret experimental sites) of Tigray, Ethiopia, during the 2019 growing season.
The experiment employed seven treatments: the control, broadcasting of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost, banding of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost, banding of prescribed chemical fertilizer (150 kg NPSZnB ha−1 + 38.
5 kg N ha−1), and three treatments of vermicompost microdosing (2, 4, and 6 t ha−1).
The treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications.
Results showed that when plots received prescribed chemical fertilizer of 150 kg NPSZnB ha−1 plus 38.
5 kg N ha−1 compared to the control treatment, average stover yields of the experimental sites increased by 81.
68% for Chiraro site, 50.
38% for Gudelo site, and 65.
88% for Hibret site.
Microdose application of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost increased stover yield by an average of 66.
70% at Chiraro site, 43.
44% at Gudelo site, and 62.
44% at Hibret site compared to the control treatment.
Grain yields increased by 108.
37%, 37.
16%, and 26.
85% at Chiraro site, 97.
27%, 57.
80%, and 47.
69% at Gudelo site, and 104.
13%, 75.
61%, and 57.
99% at Hibret site when plots received the recommended chemical fertilizer of 150 kg NPSZnB ha−1 plus 38.
5 kg N ha−1 compared to the control treatment, microdose application of 2 t ha−1 vermicompost and broadcast application of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost, respectively.
The microdose application of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost increased grain yield by 88.
63%, 24.
16%, and 14.
83% at Chiraro; 74.
18%, 39.
33%, and 30.
41% at Gudelo; and 61.
82%, 39.
22%, and 25.
25% at Hibret compared to the control treatment, microdose application of 2 t ha−1 vermicompost, and broadcast application of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost.
At all study sites, applying the recommended chemical fertilizer of 150 kg NPSZnB ha−1 + 38.
5 kg N ha−1 to maize crop plots, followed by microdose application of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost, resulted in improved agronomic yield, maximum net benefits, and marginal rate of returns.
Based on the agronomic and economic analysis results, the optimal fertilizer rate for maize production was determined to be 150 kg NPSZnB ha−1 plus 38.
5 kg N ha−1.
For resource‐poor farmers who cannot afford chemical fertilizers, applying microdoses of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost instead of broadcasting or banded application of 6 t ha−1 vermicompost could be beneficial and used as an alternative to chemical fertilizer for maize production.
Related Results
ecision Farming and Predictive Analytics in Precision Farming and Predictive Analytics in Precision Farming and Predictive Analytics in Precision Farming and Predictive Analytics in Precision Farming and Predictive Analytics in Precision Farming and Predi
ecision Farming and Predictive Analytics in Precision Farming and Predictive Analytics in Precision Farming and Predictive Analytics in Precision Farming and Predictive Analytics in Precision Farming and Predictive Analytics in Precision Farming and Predi
The scope of sensor networks and the Internet of Things spanning rapidly to diversified domains but not limited to sports, health, and business trading. In recent past, the sensors...
Smallholder maize farming in Zambia: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities
Smallholder maize farming in Zambia: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities
Agriculture remains a key priority sector in many developing countries, serving as the backbone of their economies and providing livelihoods for a significant portion of the popula...
Push-pull cropping system soil legacy alter maize metabolism and fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance through tritrophic interactions”
Push-pull cropping system soil legacy alter maize metabolism and fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance through tritrophic interactions”
Abstract
Background and aims
Crop cultivation practices and soil legacies are intrinsically linked and are hypothesized to influence plant direct and indirect defence again...
Diplomatic Claims (Eritrea v. Ethiopia), Eritrea ' s Claim 20/Ethiopia ' s Claim 8, Partial Awards; Economic Loss Throughout Ethiopia (Ethiopia v. Eritrea), Ethiopia ' s Claim 7, Partial Award; Jus ad Bellum (Ethiopia v. Eritrea), Ethiopia ' s Claims 1-8,
Diplomatic Claims (Eritrea v. Ethiopia), Eritrea ' s Claim 20/Ethiopia ' s Claim 8, Partial Awards; Economic Loss Throughout Ethiopia (Ethiopia v. Eritrea), Ethiopia ' s Claim 7, Partial Award; Jus ad Bellum (Ethiopia v. Eritrea), Ethiopia ' s Claims 1-8,
Diplomatic Claims (Eritrea v. Ethiopia), Eritrea's Claim 20/Ethiopia's Claim 8, Partial Awards. At <http://www.pca-cpa.org>.Eritrea Ethiopia Claims Commission, December 19, 2...
Prioritizing Critical Success Factors for Smallholder Maize Farmers in Zambia: A Pathway to Sustainable Food Security and Rural Development
Prioritizing Critical Success Factors for Smallholder Maize Farmers in Zambia: A Pathway to Sustainable Food Security and Rural Development
ABSTRACT
The agricultural sector is pivotal to the economies of most developing countries. In Zambia, the agricultural sector is dominated by smallholder maize fa...
Free Ranging Desi Poultry As A Component In Maize Integrated Farming System And Its Effect On Growth And Yield Of Maize (Zea Mays L.)
Free Ranging Desi Poultry As A Component In Maize Integrated Farming System And Its Effect On Growth And Yield Of Maize (Zea Mays L.)
A field experiment was conducted in farmers field at Devarayapuram village, Coimbatore during kharif, 2016 and winter 2016 -17 to study the effect of introducing free ranging desi...
KELAYAKAN USAHATANI JAGUNG HIBRIDA DI KABUPATEN MUNA PROVINSI SULAWESI TENGGARA
KELAYAKAN USAHATANI JAGUNG HIBRIDA DI KABUPATEN MUNA PROVINSI SULAWESI TENGGARA
<p>Feasibility Study of Hybrid Maize Farming in Muna District Southeast Sulawesi Province. Maize harvest area in 2015 in Muna District was 13,159 ha with the production by 32...
Evaluation of e-vermicompost for tomato production
Evaluation of e-vermicompost for tomato production
Vermicompost has a plethora of benefits that restores nutrient, stabilizes soil, and enhances soil fertility. The experiment was conducted at farmers’ field of Mymensingh and Jamal...

