Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Relations between Latvia and the Ukrainian People’s Republic, 1919–1921

View through CrossRef
With the collapse of the Russian Empire, a number of peoples, including Latvians, Estonians, Lithuanians and Ukrainians, sought independence. In 1919–1920, the goodwill of the Latvian government towards an independent Ukraine was based also on a purely pragmatic calculation of the political and economic benefits of cooperation. The relations between Latvia and the Ukrainian People’s Republic reached their peak in August and September 1920, when the Ukrainian delegation was admitted to negotiations between the Baltic States and Poland in Bulduri. After that the Latvian government was forced to reckon with the Soviet power actually existing on Ukrainian territory in order to maintain good relations with Soviet Russia, as well as to give thousands of Latvian refugees still in Ukraine a chance to return to their homeland. The sometimes striking similarities, as well as the differences, in the struggle for independence of the two countries should be noted. The similarities include the intensity of the fighting and the large number of participants or political-military actors in both countries – the Ukrainians fought with the Poles (allied with them in 1920) the Ukrainian Bolsheviks, Soviet Russia, and White Russians in different periods. The Latvians – with the Latvian Bolsheviks, Soviet Russia, Germany and the German-Balts (allied with them in the initial period), and the White Russians. In both Latvia and Ukraine, apart from Soviet Russia, which both shared as a threatening neighbor with claims to lost territories, the interests of neighboring countries (Lithuania, Estonia and Poland in Latvia, Romania, Czechoslovakia and Poland in Ukraine) played an important role in developments in both countries, as did the involvement of the Western powers. As a result of frequent changes of power, both countries and their populations experienced a terror that is difficult to describe, not only of the powers involved, but above all, of the Bolsheviks, etc. However, Latvia and the other Baltic countries preserved their independence, while the Ukrainians did not. This stems from the differences between these countries. Firstly, obvious differences in the territory and size of the nations greatly intensified the scale of events and the number of participants. The Baltic governments managed to overcome their internal differences to create a fighting force, while the Ukrainian government largely failed to do so. However, the most important factor was the high level of national self-confidence of the Baltic peoples.
Title: Relations between Latvia and the Ukrainian People’s Republic, 1919–1921
Description:
With the collapse of the Russian Empire, a number of peoples, including Latvians, Estonians, Lithuanians and Ukrainians, sought independence.
In 1919–1920, the goodwill of the Latvian government towards an independent Ukraine was based also on a purely pragmatic calculation of the political and economic benefits of cooperation.
The relations between Latvia and the Ukrainian People’s Republic reached their peak in August and September 1920, when the Ukrainian delegation was admitted to negotiations between the Baltic States and Poland in Bulduri.
After that the Latvian government was forced to reckon with the Soviet power actually existing on Ukrainian territory in order to maintain good relations with Soviet Russia, as well as to give thousands of Latvian refugees still in Ukraine a chance to return to their homeland.
The sometimes striking similarities, as well as the differences, in the struggle for independence of the two countries should be noted.
The similarities include the intensity of the fighting and the large number of participants or political-military actors in both countries – the Ukrainians fought with the Poles (allied with them in 1920) the Ukrainian Bolsheviks, Soviet Russia, and White Russians in different periods.
The Latvians – with the Latvian Bolsheviks, Soviet Russia, Germany and the German-Balts (allied with them in the initial period), and the White Russians.
In both Latvia and Ukraine, apart from Soviet Russia, which both shared as a threatening neighbor with claims to lost territories, the interests of neighboring countries (Lithuania, Estonia and Poland in Latvia, Romania, Czechoslovakia and Poland in Ukraine) played an important role in developments in both countries, as did the involvement of the Western powers.
As a result of frequent changes of power, both countries and their populations experienced a terror that is difficult to describe, not only of the powers involved, but above all, of the Bolsheviks, etc.
However, Latvia and the other Baltic countries preserved their independence, while the Ukrainians did not.
This stems from the differences between these countries.
Firstly, obvious differences in the territory and size of the nations greatly intensified the scale of events and the number of participants.
The Baltic governments managed to overcome their internal differences to create a fighting force, while the Ukrainian government largely failed to do so.
However, the most important factor was the high level of national self-confidence of the Baltic peoples.

Related Results

African Annals of Medicine reviewers in 2024
African Annals of Medicine reviewers in 2024
Le comité éditorial des Annales Africaines de Médecine tient à remercier les lecteurs qui ont analysé les manuscrits soumis pour publication au cours de l’année 2024 et ont ainsi d...
Serhii Tymoshenko: Ukrainian Architect and Diplomat
Serhii Tymoshenko: Ukrainian Architect and Diplomat
This research is focused on the life and legacy of Serhii Tymoshenko (1881–1950), Ukrainian political emigrant, political activist, statesman, and a member of the Ukrainian nationa...
UKRAINIANIZATION OF THE LITURGICAL LIFE IN 1917–1918
UKRAINIANIZATION OF THE LITURGICAL LIFE IN 1917–1918
Socio-political transformations caused by the Ukrainian revolution of 1917–1921, made not only political issues relevant but also cultural and even ideological. In the struggle for...
Events in Ukraine 1914–1922 their importance and historical background (Part 4)
Events in Ukraine 1914–1922 their importance and historical background (Part 4)
The editorial board continues to publish the most important documents that characterize the state and progress of the Ukrainian national liberation movement, the attitude of other ...
IVAN KRYPIAKEVYCH AND THE POLITICAL EMIGRANTS OF NADDNIPRIANSHCHYNA: RELATIONS AND COOPERATION (1910 – 1930)
IVAN KRYPIAKEVYCH AND THE POLITICAL EMIGRANTS OF NADDNIPRIANSHCHYNA: RELATIONS AND COOPERATION (1910 – 1930)
The study deals with Ivan Krypiakevych's relations with political emigrants of Naddniprianshchyna during the Ukrainian people's struggle for the state and national-cultural rights....
ESOTERICISM AND POLITICS: THEOSOPHY
ESOTERICISM AND POLITICS: THEOSOPHY
Interference of esotericism and politics became apparent especially in the 19th century when the early socialists expected the coming of the Age of Spirit, and narratives about sec...
SOVIET RESETTLEMENT’S PROGRAM FOR THE UKRAINIAN PEASANCE IN 1921–1925
SOVIET RESETTLEMENT’S PROGRAM FOR THE UKRAINIAN PEASANCE IN 1921–1925
The article, based on little-known sources, deals with the process of forming the policy of the Soviet government to solve such a problem as agrarian overpopulation of the USSR. Th...
TRANSLATION AS A MEAN FOR INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION: THE LATEST LITERARY TRANSLATIONS FROM UKRAINIAN TO ROMANIAN
TRANSLATION AS A MEAN FOR INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION: THE LATEST LITERARY TRANSLATIONS FROM UKRAINIAN TO ROMANIAN
The purpose of this article is to present literary translations from Ukrainian to Romanian in the context of Romanian-Ukrainian intercultural relations. The specificity of translat...

Back to Top