Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Fellowship, gender, and scholarly productivity: trends among academic neurosurgeons in the US
View through CrossRef
OBJECTIVE
Current data on fellowship choice and completion by neurosurgical residents are limited, especially in relation to gender, scholarly productivity, and career progression. The objective of this study was to determine gender differences in the selection of fellowship training and subsequent scholarly productivity and career progression.
METHODS
The authors conducted a quantitative analysis of the fellowship training information of practicing US academic neurosurgeons. Information was extracted from publicly available websites, the Scopus database, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments website.
RESULTS
Of 1641 total academic neurosurgeons, 1403 (85.5%) were fellowship trained. There were disproportionately more men (89.9%) compared to women (10.1%). A higher proportion of women completed fellowships than men (p = 0.004). Proportionally, significantly more women completed fellowships in pediatrics (p < 0.0001), neurooncology (p = 0.012), and critical care/trauma (p = 0.001), while significantly more men completed a spine fellowship (p = 0.012). Within those who were fellowship trained, the academic rank of professor was significantly more commonly held by men (p = 0.001), but assistant professor was held significantly more often by women (p = 0.017). The fellowships with the largest mean
h
-indices were functional/stereotactic, pediatrics, and critical care/trauma. Despite more women completing neurooncology and pediatric fellowships, men had significantly greater
h
-indices in these subspecialties compared to women. Women had more industry funding awards than men in pediatrics (p < 0.0001), while men had more in spine (p = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS
Women were found to have higher rates for fellowship completion compared with their male counterparts, yet had lower scholarly productivity in every subspecialty. Fellowship choice remains unequally distributed between genders, and scholarly productivity and career progression varies between fellowship choice.
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
Title: Fellowship, gender, and scholarly productivity: trends among academic neurosurgeons in the US
Description:
OBJECTIVE
Current data on fellowship choice and completion by neurosurgical residents are limited, especially in relation to gender, scholarly productivity, and career progression.
The objective of this study was to determine gender differences in the selection of fellowship training and subsequent scholarly productivity and career progression.
METHODS
The authors conducted a quantitative analysis of the fellowship training information of practicing US academic neurosurgeons.
Information was extracted from publicly available websites, the Scopus database, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments website.
RESULTS
Of 1641 total academic neurosurgeons, 1403 (85.
5%) were fellowship trained.
There were disproportionately more men (89.
9%) compared to women (10.
1%).
A higher proportion of women completed fellowships than men (p = 0.
004).
Proportionally, significantly more women completed fellowships in pediatrics (p < 0.
0001), neurooncology (p = 0.
012), and critical care/trauma (p = 0.
001), while significantly more men completed a spine fellowship (p = 0.
012).
Within those who were fellowship trained, the academic rank of professor was significantly more commonly held by men (p = 0.
001), but assistant professor was held significantly more often by women (p = 0.
017).
The fellowships with the largest mean
h
-indices were functional/stereotactic, pediatrics, and critical care/trauma.
Despite more women completing neurooncology and pediatric fellowships, men had significantly greater
h
-indices in these subspecialties compared to women.
Women had more industry funding awards than men in pediatrics (p < 0.
0001), while men had more in spine (p = 0.
023).
CONCLUSIONS
Women were found to have higher rates for fellowship completion compared with their male counterparts, yet had lower scholarly productivity in every subspecialty.
Fellowship choice remains unequally distributed between genders, and scholarly productivity and career progression varies between fellowship choice.
Related Results
Factors Associated with Infectious Diseases Fellowship Academic Success
Factors Associated with Infectious Diseases Fellowship Academic Success
Abstract
Background: A multitude of factors are considered in an infectious diseases (ID) training program’s meticulous selection process of ID fellows but their correlatio...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract
The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
For the further training of individuals in neurosurgery II: the academic legacy of the William P. Van Wagenen Fellowship
For the further training of individuals in neurosurgery II: the academic legacy of the William P. Van Wagenen Fellowship
OBJECTIVE
William P. Van Wagenen pursued a research fellowship in Europe early in his career under the recommendation of Harvey Cushing. Later, Van Wagenen woul...
An assessment of academic productivity in pediatric neurosurgery
An assessment of academic productivity in pediatric neurosurgery
Object
Various bibliometric indices are now commonly used to assess academic productivity in medicine. Some evidence suggests that these measures are specific to subspecialty areas...
Factors important in laryngology fellow and laryngology fellowship selection
Factors important in laryngology fellow and laryngology fellowship selection
Objectives/HypothesisTo determine factors that laryngology fellowship directors believe are most important in choosing a fellow and that laryngology applicants believe are most imp...
Academia 1.0: Slow Food in a Fast Food Culture? (A Reply to John Hartley)
Academia 1.0: Slow Food in a Fast Food Culture? (A Reply to John Hartley)
"You could think of our kind of scholarship," he said, "as something like 'slow food' in a fast-food culture."— Ivan Kreilkamp, co-editor of Victorian Studies(Chronicle of Higher E...
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Simulation Use Survey*
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Simulation Use Survey*
Objectives:
Simulation-based education is used in the U.S. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship programs, yet the prevalence and types of simulation used is unkn...
Poster 155: The Prevalence of “Pipelining” at the Top Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Programs
Poster 155: The Prevalence of “Pipelining” at the Top Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Programs
Objectives:
The term “pipelining” refers to the phenomenon that applicants from certain residency programs frequently match at the same fellowship programs. How...

