Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Acceptance and Conformity: Merging Modernity with Nationalism in the Stockholm Exhibition in 1930

View through CrossRef
This article takes a closer look at how interwar supporters of modernism sought to overcome the opposition they had to face. It does so by looking at the usage of history and Swedishness at the Stockholm Exhibition in 1930 and contrasting this experience with a brief excursus on the image of progress and Americanism as presented at the A Century of Progress International Exposition, held in Chicago in 1933–1934. The backers of both these exhibitions – functionalist architects and progressive businessmen, respectively – consciously sought to find ways in which to savor the propagandistic value of this “the shock of the new” while retaining a reassuring continuity between well-known and widespread self-identifications with “the idyll of the past.” They did so by forging “national” forms of modernity, attempting to bypass the political conflicts and ideological polarizations which characterized the interwar years. As such, it is argued, they also exemplify how the logic of the exhibition could be used for harnessing technology, science, and funkis (functionalism) as tools for re-identifying the nation with modernity and simultaneously de-politicizing modernism.
Linkoping University Electronic Press
Title: Acceptance and Conformity: Merging Modernity with Nationalism in the Stockholm Exhibition in 1930
Description:
This article takes a closer look at how interwar supporters of modernism sought to overcome the opposition they had to face.
It does so by looking at the usage of history and Swedishness at the Stockholm Exhibition in 1930 and contrasting this experience with a brief excursus on the image of progress and Americanism as presented at the A Century of Progress International Exposition, held in Chicago in 1933–1934.
The backers of both these exhibitions – functionalist architects and progressive businessmen, respectively – consciously sought to find ways in which to savor the propagandistic value of this “the shock of the new” while retaining a reassuring continuity between well-known and widespread self-identifications with “the idyll of the past.
” They did so by forging “national” forms of modernity, attempting to bypass the political conflicts and ideological polarizations which characterized the interwar years.
As such, it is argued, they also exemplify how the logic of the exhibition could be used for harnessing technology, science, and funkis (functionalism) as tools for re-identifying the nation with modernity and simultaneously de-politicizing modernism.

Related Results

Shaping the Discourse on Modernity
Shaping the Discourse on Modernity
In this opening article, the editors of History, Culture and Modernity provide an overview of recent debates relating to “modernity”, inviting prospective authors to participate in...
“Jews, Be Ottomans!” Zionism, Ottomanism, and Ottomanisation in the Hebrew-Language Press, 1890–1914
“Jews, Be Ottomans!” Zionism, Ottomanism, and Ottomanisation in the Hebrew-Language Press, 1890–1914
In recent years the study of national and civic identities in the later Ottoman period has revealed huge degrees of complexity among previously homogenised groups, none more so tha...
Post–national Spain? Post–Spanish Spain?
Post–national Spain? Post–Spanish Spain?
The term ‘post–nationalism’ has been proposed to designate the emergence of political bodies in the wake of economic globalisation. However, not only is the ‘post–national landscap...
Gellner, the ‘Saints’ and Central Asia: between Islam and Nationalism
Gellner, the ‘Saints’ and Central Asia: between Islam and Nationalism
AbstractThis article assesses the salience for Central Asia of Ernest Gellner’s theories about Islam, modernity and nationalism. Gellner has argued that modernisation homogenises c...
Political Legitimacy, Democracy and Islamic Law: The Place of Self‐Government in Islamic Political Thought
Political Legitimacy, Democracy and Islamic Law: The Place of Self‐Government in Islamic Political Thought
Abstract Contemporary Political Islam, or Islamism, is commonly defined as a movement that seeks to apply the Sharīʿa as the basic law of Muslim states. This suggests that politica...

Back to Top