Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Strengthening Workspaces: Adapting Wellington’s Earthquake Prone Heritage Buildings for Co-Workspaces

View through CrossRef
<p><b>In the late 1960s the Wellington City Council surveyed all the commercial buildings in the city and marked nearly 200 as earthquake prone. The owners were given 15 years to either strengthen or demolish their buildings. The end result was mass demolition throughout the seventies and eighties.¹ Prompted by the Christchurch earthquakes, once again the council has published a list of over 630 earthquake prone buildings that need to be strengthened or demolished by 2030.²Of these earthquake prone buildings, the majority were built between 1880 and 1930, with 125 buildings appearing on the Wellington City Council Heritage Building List.³ This list accounts for a significant proportion of character buildings in the city. There is a danger that the aesthetic integrity of our city will be further damaged due to the urgent need to strengthen these buildings. Many of the building owners are resistant because of the high cost. By adapting these buildings to house co-workspaces, we can gain more than just the retention of the building’s heritage. The seismic upgrade provides the opportunity for the office space to be redesigned to suit changes in the ways we work. Through a design-based research approach this thesis proposes a framework that clarifies the process of adapting Wellington’s earthquake prone heritage buildings to accommodate co-working. This framework deals with the key concepts of program, structure and heritage. The framework is tested on one of Wellington’s earthquake prone heritage buildings, the Wellington Working Men’s Club, in order to demonstrate what can be gained from this strengthening process. ¹ Reid, J., “Hometown Boomtown,” in NZ On Screen (Wellington, 1983).</b></p> <p>² Wellington City Council, List of Earthquake Prone Buildings as at 06/03/2017. (Wellington: Absolutely Positively Wellington. 2017).</p> <p>³ ibid. </p>
Victoria University of Wellington Library
Title: Strengthening Workspaces: Adapting Wellington’s Earthquake Prone Heritage Buildings for Co-Workspaces
Description:
<p><b>In the late 1960s the Wellington City Council surveyed all the commercial buildings in the city and marked nearly 200 as earthquake prone.
The owners were given 15 years to either strengthen or demolish their buildings.
The end result was mass demolition throughout the seventies and eighties.
¹ Prompted by the Christchurch earthquakes, once again the council has published a list of over 630 earthquake prone buildings that need to be strengthened or demolished by 2030.
²Of these earthquake prone buildings, the majority were built between 1880 and 1930, with 125 buildings appearing on the Wellington City Council Heritage Building List.
³ This list accounts for a significant proportion of character buildings in the city.
There is a danger that the aesthetic integrity of our city will be further damaged due to the urgent need to strengthen these buildings.
Many of the building owners are resistant because of the high cost.
By adapting these buildings to house co-workspaces, we can gain more than just the retention of the building’s heritage.
The seismic upgrade provides the opportunity for the office space to be redesigned to suit changes in the ways we work.
 Through a design-based research approach this thesis proposes a framework that clarifies the process of adapting Wellington’s earthquake prone heritage buildings to accommodate co-working.
This framework deals with the key concepts of program, structure and heritage.
The framework is tested on one of Wellington’s earthquake prone heritage buildings, the Wellington Working Men’s Club, in order to demonstrate what can be gained from this strengthening process.
 ¹ Reid, J.
, “Hometown Boomtown,” in NZ On Screen (Wellington, 1983).
</b></p> <p>² Wellington City Council, List of Earthquake Prone Buildings as at 06/03/2017.
(Wellington: Absolutely Positively Wellington.
2017).
</p> <p>³ ibid.
 </p>.

Related Results

Giving Structure a Shake Up: Integrating Seismic Upgrades into Interior Architecture
Giving Structure a Shake Up: Integrating Seismic Upgrades into Interior Architecture
<p dir="ltr">Wellington has a problem. It’s built environment contains a high number of earthquake prone buildings which, in an earthquake prone environment, is concerning. T...
Time Passes
Time Passes
<p>The demand for a new approach to safeguarding New Zealand’s endangered historic buildings was identified as a result of the recent increase in building code and strengthen...
Faith on Shaky Ground: Adapting two earthquake-prone Anglican churches for contemporary use through analogue drawing
Faith on Shaky Ground: Adapting two earthquake-prone Anglican churches for contemporary use through analogue drawing
<p><strong>Throughout New Zealand, Anglican church congregations are facing significant issues with their older buildings. Historic churches are more likely to have se...
Analysis of maxillofacial fracture victims in the Wenchuan earthquake and Yushu earthquake
Analysis of maxillofacial fracture victims in the Wenchuan earthquake and Yushu earthquake
Abstract –  Objective: To analyze retrospectively 419 patients after the Wenchuan earthquake and 46 after Yushu earthquake with maxillofacial fractures so as to provide reference o...
Detect and characterize swarm-like seismicity
Detect and characterize swarm-like seismicity
Tectonic earthquake swarms exhibit a distinct temporal and spatial pattern compared to mainshock-aftershock sequences. Unlike the latter ones, where the earthquake sequence typical...
Application of apparent strong earthquake activity pattern in operational earthquake forecasting
Application of apparent strong earthquake activity pattern in operational earthquake forecasting
Abstract Consulting the Catalogue of the International Seismological Centre (ISC), for the period 1904–2016 to detect the occurrence of potentially damaging earthquakes we ...
UNESCO’s “Benign Organism”: The ‘World Heritage Regime’ and Its International Influence
UNESCO’s “Benign Organism”: The ‘World Heritage Regime’ and Its International Influence
<p><b>State aspirations to have national properties recognised as belonging to the heritage of humanity with an international significance has increasingly empowered th...

Back to Top