Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Territoriality

View through CrossRef
Territoriality is a foundational concept in animal behavior and behavioral ecology. Territoriality is commonly defined as “the defense of an area,” wherein the area being defended is known as the “territory.” Territoriality serves as a framework that allows animal behaviorists and behavioral ecologists to describe and hypothesize links among diverse aspects of animals’ biology. The many facets and functions of territoriality include the acquisition of food, nest sites, and shelter, space-use and movement behavior, and interactions with mates and competitors. Thus, because territoriality encompasses behaviors that directly determine individuals’ survival and reproduction (i.e., their fitness), it offers a powerful approach to understanding the evolution of animal behavior. Territoriality has been used to describe animal behavior for many centuries, particularly in avian systems; conversely, many advances in how biologists conceive of and use territoriality have arisen in research on birds. Operational definitions of territory fall broadly into two categories—those that focus on animals’ behavior and those that focus on their ecological relationships. That said, the question of how to conceive of territory has long been a subject of contention, with widely varied opinions on how the term should be defined and whether and how it is useful for understanding animal behavior. Discussions and critiques of territoriality, from not only animal behavior and behavioral ecology but also from the social sciences, help to contextualize and sharpen how we use the concept to understand the evolution of animal behavior. Technological and statistical advances continue to change the ways in which territories are mapped and quantified, with different methods available for taxa of different sizes, habitats, and life histories. Research on territoriality can be divided into two large domains based on the function served by territory—foraging and mating—but these two functions are intimately linked through the socioecological hypothesis that proposes a relationship between resource distributions and mating systems. This hypothesis has served to structure much research on territoriality in the last half-century or so. Finally, territoriality is pertinent not just to within-species interactions but also to between-species interactions and species coexistence, with implications for macroecological and macroevolutionary patterns and processes.
Oxford University Press
Title: Territoriality
Description:
Territoriality is a foundational concept in animal behavior and behavioral ecology.
Territoriality is commonly defined as “the defense of an area,” wherein the area being defended is known as the “territory.
” Territoriality serves as a framework that allows animal behaviorists and behavioral ecologists to describe and hypothesize links among diverse aspects of animals’ biology.
The many facets and functions of territoriality include the acquisition of food, nest sites, and shelter, space-use and movement behavior, and interactions with mates and competitors.
Thus, because territoriality encompasses behaviors that directly determine individuals’ survival and reproduction (i.
e.
, their fitness), it offers a powerful approach to understanding the evolution of animal behavior.
Territoriality has been used to describe animal behavior for many centuries, particularly in avian systems; conversely, many advances in how biologists conceive of and use territoriality have arisen in research on birds.
Operational definitions of territory fall broadly into two categories—those that focus on animals’ behavior and those that focus on their ecological relationships.
That said, the question of how to conceive of territory has long been a subject of contention, with widely varied opinions on how the term should be defined and whether and how it is useful for understanding animal behavior.
Discussions and critiques of territoriality, from not only animal behavior and behavioral ecology but also from the social sciences, help to contextualize and sharpen how we use the concept to understand the evolution of animal behavior.
Technological and statistical advances continue to change the ways in which territories are mapped and quantified, with different methods available for taxa of different sizes, habitats, and life histories.
Research on territoriality can be divided into two large domains based on the function served by territory—foraging and mating—but these two functions are intimately linked through the socioecological hypothesis that proposes a relationship between resource distributions and mating systems.
This hypothesis has served to structure much research on territoriality in the last half-century or so.
Finally, territoriality is pertinent not just to within-species interactions but also to between-species interactions and species coexistence, with implications for macroecological and macroevolutionary patterns and processes.

Related Results

Influencing Mechanism of Justice Sensitivity on Knowledge Hiding in the Chinese Context
Influencing Mechanism of Justice Sensitivity on Knowledge Hiding in the Chinese Context
Good knowledge management is important for enterprises to maintain competitive advantage; however, the knowledge hiding behavior may hinder this process. Based on the conservation ...
TERITORIALITAS DALAM TINJAUAN ILMU ARSITEKTUR
TERITORIALITAS DALAM TINJAUAN ILMU ARSITEKTUR
ABSTRACTHuman activities form territorial behavior to achieve their privacy. Theories about territoriality were stated by experts. How do the opinions of experts on territorial the...
Introduction
Introduction
The Introduction lays out the book’s central argument about territoriality. I argue that Egypt constitutes an important case study given that it assumed more territorial definition...
Thinking through Territoriality: Introducing Claude Raffestin to Anglophone Sociospatial Theory
Thinking through Territoriality: Introducing Claude Raffestin to Anglophone Sociospatial Theory
This introductory paper establishes the grounds for a more sustained discussion of Claude Raffestin's understanding of human territoriality in its contribution to contemporary geog...
David Slater: a leading geographical theorist
David Slater: a leading geographical theorist
David Slater is an enigmatic figure in radical geography. He is much regarded for his theoretical contributions to geography although few geographers seem to know to what he contri...
Place Meanings People Attribute to Water Environment of Catchment - Patterns of Spatial Perception with Territoriality
Place Meanings People Attribute to Water Environment of Catchment - Patterns of Spatial Perception with Territoriality
To promote sustainable water resource management through collaboration among multiple stakeholders including managers, water users, and residents, it is essential to understand pla...
The Location of New Kingdom Elite Tombs – Space, Place and Significance
The Location of New Kingdom Elite Tombs – Space, Place and Significance
This paper deals with the significance of provincial New Kingdom elite tomb location. It aims to describe a key element of the relationship between the elite and the spatial distri...
Les fondements territoriaux de la persistance de l'agriculture familiale en Chine
Les fondements territoriaux de la persistance de l'agriculture familiale en Chine
The spatial basis of the persistance of familial agriculture in China. — The analysis of the alienation of work has generally done without any consideration of the specific nature ...

Back to Top