Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Urgency of Establishing a Business Competition Court in Indonesia

View through CrossRef
Fair law enforcement in handling the business competition complications in Indonesia is essential to promote a conducive business competition climate and to ensure the enforcement of Law Number 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. The legal system in the business competition court in Indonesia cannot be separated from the role of KPPU as an institution with the function of regulating and monitoring competition behavior. KPPU, in the context of law enforcement on business competition complications, has the authority to conduct an investigation and adjudicate on the competition disputes in a judicial institution organized by KPPU. Analyzing the authority of KPPU starting from the process of an investigation until the adjudication to business competition cases is a matter that needs to be studied in the corridor of its independence. KPPU’s authority in conducting the investigation and the adjudication needs to be studied more specifically, especially in its function to ensure a sense of justice and impartiality for business actors as the accused parties in a dispute. This study aims to assess the urgency of establishing a business competition court in Indonesia. For this reason, the research methods used were the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. This research has a potential significance to be used as the material in making the amendment for the competition law in Indonesia to urge the Government and Judiciary to form an independent business competition court. Keywords: Business competition; competition law; KPPU
Title: The Urgency of Establishing a Business Competition Court in Indonesia
Description:
Fair law enforcement in handling the business competition complications in Indonesia is essential to promote a conducive business competition climate and to ensure the enforcement of Law Number 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.
The legal system in the business competition court in Indonesia cannot be separated from the role of KPPU as an institution with the function of regulating and monitoring competition behavior.
KPPU, in the context of law enforcement on business competition complications, has the authority to conduct an investigation and adjudicate on the competition disputes in a judicial institution organized by KPPU.
Analyzing the authority of KPPU starting from the process of an investigation until the adjudication to business competition cases is a matter that needs to be studied in the corridor of its independence.
KPPU’s authority in conducting the investigation and the adjudication needs to be studied more specifically, especially in its function to ensure a sense of justice and impartiality for business actors as the accused parties in a dispute.
This study aims to assess the urgency of establishing a business competition court in Indonesia.
For this reason, the research methods used were the statutory approach and the conceptual approach.
This research has a potential significance to be used as the material in making the amendment for the competition law in Indonesia to urge the Government and Judiciary to form an independent business competition court.
Keywords: Business competition; competition law; KPPU.

Related Results

Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com Abstract Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
Conference Committee
Conference Committee
Abstract Advisory Committee Prof. Dr. Dwia Ariestina Pulubuhu, MA. (Hasanuddin University, Indonesia) Prof. Dr. Ir....
Fontevecchia Case
Fontevecchia Case
Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969, Article 63(1) — Remedial jurisdiction of Inter-American Court of Human R...
To Ban or Not to Ban : The Supreme Court and Obscenity
To Ban or Not to Ban : The Supreme Court and Obscenity
Since 1957, the United States Supreme Court has exhibited a marked shift in its attitude toward freedom of expression. This shift may be directly attributed to changes in the Court...
Peran Pengadilan Agama Kediri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah
Peran Pengadilan Agama Kediri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah
The formulation of this thesis problem has three aspects, those are: (1) How is the authority of Religious Court of Kediri in resolving sharia economics disputes before the Decisio...

Back to Top