Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Urgency of Establishing a Business Competition Court in Indonesia
View through CrossRef
Fair law enforcement in handling the business competition complications in Indonesia is essential to promote a conducive business competition climate and to ensure the enforcement of Law Number 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. The legal system in the business competition court in Indonesia cannot be separated from the role of KPPU as an institution with the function of regulating and monitoring competition behavior. KPPU, in the context of law enforcement on business competition complications, has the authority to conduct an investigation and adjudicate on the competition disputes in a judicial institution organized by KPPU. Analyzing the authority of KPPU starting from the process of an investigation until the adjudication to business competition cases is a matter that needs to be studied in the corridor of its independence. KPPU’s authority in conducting the investigation and the adjudication needs to be studied more specifically, especially in its function to ensure a sense of justice and impartiality for business actors as the accused parties in a dispute. This study aims to assess the urgency of establishing a business competition court in Indonesia. For this reason, the research methods used were the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. This research has a potential significance to be used as the material in making the amendment for the competition law in Indonesia to urge the Government and Judiciary to form an independent business competition court.
Keywords: Business competition; competition law; KPPU
Title: The Urgency of Establishing a Business Competition Court in Indonesia
Description:
Fair law enforcement in handling the business competition complications in Indonesia is essential to promote a conducive business competition climate and to ensure the enforcement of Law Number 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.
The legal system in the business competition court in Indonesia cannot be separated from the role of KPPU as an institution with the function of regulating and monitoring competition behavior.
KPPU, in the context of law enforcement on business competition complications, has the authority to conduct an investigation and adjudicate on the competition disputes in a judicial institution organized by KPPU.
Analyzing the authority of KPPU starting from the process of an investigation until the adjudication to business competition cases is a matter that needs to be studied in the corridor of its independence.
KPPU’s authority in conducting the investigation and the adjudication needs to be studied more specifically, especially in its function to ensure a sense of justice and impartiality for business actors as the accused parties in a dispute.
This study aims to assess the urgency of establishing a business competition court in Indonesia.
For this reason, the research methods used were the statutory approach and the conceptual approach.
This research has a potential significance to be used as the material in making the amendment for the competition law in Indonesia to urge the Government and Judiciary to form an independent business competition court.
Keywords: Business competition; competition law; KPPU.
Related Results
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
To Ban or Not to Ban : The Supreme Court and Obscenity
To Ban or Not to Ban : The Supreme Court and Obscenity
Since 1957, the United States Supreme Court has exhibited a marked shift in its attitude toward freedom of expression. This shift may be directly attributed to changes in the Court...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Dampak Ekosistem Digital terhadap Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia serta Optimalisasi Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) di Era Ekonomi Digital
Dampak Ekosistem Digital terhadap Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia serta Optimalisasi Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) di Era Ekonomi Digital
Era ekonomi digital seperti saat ini, telah menuntut para pelaku bisnis untuk melakukan kegiatan usahanya secara daring. Akibat dari itu, para pembeli juga akan melakukan pembelian...
The Principle of Appeals on Points of Law
The Principle of Appeals on Points of Law
Regarding the structure of criminal appeals, the judicial precedent establishes the principle of ‘appeals on points of fact,’ which stipulates that the court of the second instance...
THE ARISTOCRAT BECOMES A COURTIER… FEATURES OF EUROPEAN ARISTOCRATIC CULTURE IN THE 17th CENTURY
THE ARISTOCRAT BECOMES A COURTIER… FEATURES OF EUROPEAN ARISTOCRATIC CULTURE IN THE 17th CENTURY
As John Adamson outlined in his voluminous comparative analysis of European court culture, „in the period between 1500 and 1750 a „Versailles model” of a court as a self-sufficient...
Amar Putusan Pada Kewenangan Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi
Amar Putusan Pada Kewenangan Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi
The Constitutional Court as an Indonesian state institution in the judicial review of the law against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia has been regulated by Law N...
The Future of Securities Law in the Supreme Court
The Future of Securities Law in the Supreme Court
Since the enactment of the first federal securities statute in 1933, securities law has illustrated key shifts in the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence. During the New Deal, the Court’...

