Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A framework for testing different imputation methods for tabular datasets

View through CrossRef
AbstractBackground and purposeHandling missing values is a prevalent challenge in the analysis of clinical data. The rise of data-driven models demands an efficient use of the available data. Methods to impute missing values are thus crucial. Here, we developed a publicly available framework to test different imputation methods and compared their impact in a typical stroke clinical dataset as a use case.MethodsA clinical dataset based on the 1000Plus stroke study with 380 completed-entries patients was used. 13 common clinical parameters including numerical and categorical values were selected. Missing values in a missing-at-random (MAR) and missing-completely-at-random (MCAR) fashion from 0% to 60% were simulated and consequently imputed using the mean, hot-deck, multiple imputation by chained equations, expectation maximization method and listwise deletion. The performance was assessed by the root mean squared error, the absolute bias and the performance of a linear model for discharge mRS prediction.ResultsListwise deletion was the worst performing method and started to be significantly worse than any imputation method from 2% (MAR) and 3% (MCAR) missing values on. The underlying missing value mechanism seemed to have a crucial influence on the identified best performing imputation method. Consequently no single imputation method outperformed all others. A significant performance drop of the linear model started from 11% (MAR+MCAR) and 18% (MCAR) missing values.ConclusionsIn the presented case study of a typical clinical stroke dataset we confirmed that listwise deletion should be avoided for dealing with missing values. Our findings indicate that the underlying missing value mechanism and other dataset characteristics strongly influence the best choice of imputation method. For future studies with similar data structure, we thus suggest to use the developed framework in this study to select the most suitable imputation method for a given dataset prior to analysis.
Title: A framework for testing different imputation methods for tabular datasets
Description:
AbstractBackground and purposeHandling missing values is a prevalent challenge in the analysis of clinical data.
The rise of data-driven models demands an efficient use of the available data.
Methods to impute missing values are thus crucial.
Here, we developed a publicly available framework to test different imputation methods and compared their impact in a typical stroke clinical dataset as a use case.
MethodsA clinical dataset based on the 1000Plus stroke study with 380 completed-entries patients was used.
13 common clinical parameters including numerical and categorical values were selected.
Missing values in a missing-at-random (MAR) and missing-completely-at-random (MCAR) fashion from 0% to 60% were simulated and consequently imputed using the mean, hot-deck, multiple imputation by chained equations, expectation maximization method and listwise deletion.
The performance was assessed by the root mean squared error, the absolute bias and the performance of a linear model for discharge mRS prediction.
ResultsListwise deletion was the worst performing method and started to be significantly worse than any imputation method from 2% (MAR) and 3% (MCAR) missing values on.
The underlying missing value mechanism seemed to have a crucial influence on the identified best performing imputation method.
Consequently no single imputation method outperformed all others.
A significant performance drop of the linear model started from 11% (MAR+MCAR) and 18% (MCAR) missing values.
ConclusionsIn the presented case study of a typical clinical stroke dataset we confirmed that listwise deletion should be avoided for dealing with missing values.
Our findings indicate that the underlying missing value mechanism and other dataset characteristics strongly influence the best choice of imputation method.
For future studies with similar data structure, we thus suggest to use the developed framework in this study to select the most suitable imputation method for a given dataset prior to analysis.

Related Results

Advanced methods for missing values imputation based on similarity learning
Advanced methods for missing values imputation based on similarity learning
The real-world data analysis and processing using data mining techniques often are facing observations that contain missing values. The main challenge of mining datasets is the exi...
TABular Semantic Enhancement Blueprint (TAB-SEB) v1
TABular Semantic Enhancement Blueprint (TAB-SEB) v1
Project website link: https://ariannamorettj.github.io/tab_seb/ Overview Purpose. The workflow blueprint supports semantic enhancement of Cultural Heritage and GLAM metadata by c...
A comparative study of imputation techniques for missing values in healthcare diagnostic datasets
A comparative study of imputation techniques for missing values in healthcare diagnostic datasets
Abstract Missing values are a common feature of real-world datasets, particularly in healthcare data. This can be challenging when applying machine learning algor...
GSimp: A Gibbs sampler based left-censored missing value imputation approach for metabolomics studies
GSimp: A Gibbs sampler based left-censored missing value imputation approach for metabolomics studies
Abstract Left-censored missing values commonly exist in targeted metabolomics datasets and can be considered as missing not at random (MNAR). Imp...
Imputation Accuracy Across Global Human Populations
Imputation Accuracy Across Global Human Populations
Abstract Genotype imputation is now fundamental for genome-wide association studies but lacks fairness due to the underrepresentation of populations with non-Europe...
Evaluation of sequencing strategies for whole-genome imputation with hybrid peeling
Evaluation of sequencing strategies for whole-genome imputation with hybrid peeling
Abstract Background For assembling large whole-genome sequence datasets to be used routinely in research and breeding, the sequ...
A unifying framework for summary statistic imputation
A unifying framework for summary statistic imputation
Abstract Imputation has been widely utilized to aid and interpret the results of Genome-Wide Association Studies(GWAS). Imputation can increase t...
A Coalescent Model for Genotype Imputation
A Coalescent Model for Genotype Imputation
AbstractThe potential for imputed genotypes to enhance an analysis of genetic data depends largely on the accuracy of imputation, which in turn depends on properties of the referen...

Back to Top