Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A framework for testing different imputation methods for tabular datasets
View through CrossRef
AbstractBackground and purposeHandling missing values is a prevalent challenge in the analysis of clinical data. The rise of data-driven models demands an efficient use of the available data. Methods to impute missing values are thus crucial. Here, we developed a publicly available framework to test different imputation methods and compared their impact in a typical stroke clinical dataset as a use case.MethodsA clinical dataset based on the 1000Plus stroke study with 380 completed-entries patients was used. 13 common clinical parameters including numerical and categorical values were selected. Missing values in a missing-at-random (MAR) and missing-completely-at-random (MCAR) fashion from 0% to 60% were simulated and consequently imputed using the mean, hot-deck, multiple imputation by chained equations, expectation maximization method and listwise deletion. The performance was assessed by the root mean squared error, the absolute bias and the performance of a linear model for discharge mRS prediction.ResultsListwise deletion was the worst performing method and started to be significantly worse than any imputation method from 2% (MAR) and 3% (MCAR) missing values on. The underlying missing value mechanism seemed to have a crucial influence on the identified best performing imputation method. Consequently no single imputation method outperformed all others. A significant performance drop of the linear model started from 11% (MAR+MCAR) and 18% (MCAR) missing values.ConclusionsIn the presented case study of a typical clinical stroke dataset we confirmed that listwise deletion should be avoided for dealing with missing values. Our findings indicate that the underlying missing value mechanism and other dataset characteristics strongly influence the best choice of imputation method. For future studies with similar data structure, we thus suggest to use the developed framework in this study to select the most suitable imputation method for a given dataset prior to analysis.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Title: A framework for testing different imputation methods for tabular datasets
Description:
AbstractBackground and purposeHandling missing values is a prevalent challenge in the analysis of clinical data.
The rise of data-driven models demands an efficient use of the available data.
Methods to impute missing values are thus crucial.
Here, we developed a publicly available framework to test different imputation methods and compared their impact in a typical stroke clinical dataset as a use case.
MethodsA clinical dataset based on the 1000Plus stroke study with 380 completed-entries patients was used.
13 common clinical parameters including numerical and categorical values were selected.
Missing values in a missing-at-random (MAR) and missing-completely-at-random (MCAR) fashion from 0% to 60% were simulated and consequently imputed using the mean, hot-deck, multiple imputation by chained equations, expectation maximization method and listwise deletion.
The performance was assessed by the root mean squared error, the absolute bias and the performance of a linear model for discharge mRS prediction.
ResultsListwise deletion was the worst performing method and started to be significantly worse than any imputation method from 2% (MAR) and 3% (MCAR) missing values on.
The underlying missing value mechanism seemed to have a crucial influence on the identified best performing imputation method.
Consequently no single imputation method outperformed all others.
A significant performance drop of the linear model started from 11% (MAR+MCAR) and 18% (MCAR) missing values.
ConclusionsIn the presented case study of a typical clinical stroke dataset we confirmed that listwise deletion should be avoided for dealing with missing values.
Our findings indicate that the underlying missing value mechanism and other dataset characteristics strongly influence the best choice of imputation method.
For future studies with similar data structure, we thus suggest to use the developed framework in this study to select the most suitable imputation method for a given dataset prior to analysis.
Related Results
GSimp: A Gibbs sampler based left-censored missing value imputation approach for metabolomics studies
GSimp: A Gibbs sampler based left-censored missing value imputation approach for metabolomics studies
AbstractLeft-censored missing values commonly exist in targeted metabolomics datasets and can be considered as missing not at random (MNAR). Improper data processing procedures for...
Genotype Imputation
Genotype Imputation
Abstract
A missing data problem arises in genetic epidemiological studies when genotypes of particular markers are unavailable fo...
Imputation of Spatially-resolved Transcriptomes by Graph-regularized Tensor Completion
Imputation of Spatially-resolved Transcriptomes by Graph-regularized Tensor Completion
AbstractHigh-throughput spatial-transcriptomics RNA sequencing (sptRNA-seq) based on in-situ capturing technologies has recently been developed to spatially resolve transcriptome-w...
A New Approach of Outlier-robust Missing Value Imputation for Metabolomics Data Analysis
A New Approach of Outlier-robust Missing Value Imputation for Metabolomics Data Analysis
Background:Metabolomics data generation and quantification are different from other types of molecular “omics” data in bioinformatics. Mass spectrometry (MS) based (gas chromatogra...
MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data
MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data
AbstractMotivation: Modern data acquisition based on high-throughput technology is often facing the problem of missing data. Algorithms commonly used in the analysis of such large-...
weIMPUTE: A User-Friendly Web-Based Genotype Imputation Platform
weIMPUTE: A User-Friendly Web-Based Genotype Imputation Platform
AbstractGenotype imputation is a critical preprocessing step in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), enhancing statistical power for detecting associated single nucleotide polym...
Enhancing data integrity in Electronic Health Records: Review of methods for handling missing data
Enhancing data integrity in Electronic Health Records: Review of methods for handling missing data
AbstractIntroductionElectronic Health Records (EHRs) are vital repositories of patient information for medical research, but the prevalence of missing data presents an obstacle to ...
Artificial neural network-based data imputation for handling anomalous energy consumption readings in smart homes
Artificial neural network-based data imputation for handling anomalous energy consumption readings in smart homes
Smart homes are at the forefront of sustainable living, utilizing advanced monitoring systems to optimize energy consumption. However, these systems frequently encounter issues wit...


