Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Leveraging cancer mutation data to inform the pathogenicity classification of germline missense variants

View through CrossRef
Innovative and easy-to-implement strategies are needed to improve the pathogenicity assessment of rare germline missense variants. Somatic cancer driver mutations identified through large-scale tumor sequencing studies often impact genes that are also associated with rare Mendelian disorders. The use of cancer mutation data to aid in the interpretation of germline missense variants, regardless of whether the gene is associated with a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome or a non-cancer-related developmental disorder, has not been systematically assessed. We extracted putative cancer driver missense mutations from the Cancer Hotspots database and annotated them as germline variants, including presence/absence and classification in ClinVar. We trained two supervised learning models (logistic regression and random forest) to predict variant classifications of germline missense variants in ClinVar using Cancer Hotspot data (training dataset). The performance of each model was evaluated with an independent test dataset generated in part from searching public and private genome-wide sequencing datasets from ~1.5 million individuals. Of the 2,447 cancer mutations, 691 corresponding germline variants had been previously classified in ClinVar: 426 (61.6%) as likely pathogenic/pathogenic, 261 (37.8%) as uncertain significance, and 4 (0.6%) as likely benign/benign. The odds ratio for a likely pathogenic/pathogenic classification in ClinVar was 28.3 (95% confidence interval: 24.2–33.1, p < 0.001), compared with all other germline missense variants in the same 216 genes. Both supervised learning models showed high correlation with pathogenicity assessments in the training dataset. There was high area under precision-recall curve values (0.847 and 0.829) and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve values (0.821 and 0.774) for logistic regression and random forest models, respectively, when applied to the test dataset. With the use of cancer and germline datasets and supervised learning techniques, our study shows that cancer mutation data can be leveraged to improve the interpretation of germline missense variation potentially causing rare Mendelian disorders.
Title: Leveraging cancer mutation data to inform the pathogenicity classification of germline missense variants
Description:
Innovative and easy-to-implement strategies are needed to improve the pathogenicity assessment of rare germline missense variants.
Somatic cancer driver mutations identified through large-scale tumor sequencing studies often impact genes that are also associated with rare Mendelian disorders.
The use of cancer mutation data to aid in the interpretation of germline missense variants, regardless of whether the gene is associated with a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome or a non-cancer-related developmental disorder, has not been systematically assessed.
We extracted putative cancer driver missense mutations from the Cancer Hotspots database and annotated them as germline variants, including presence/absence and classification in ClinVar.
We trained two supervised learning models (logistic regression and random forest) to predict variant classifications of germline missense variants in ClinVar using Cancer Hotspot data (training dataset).
The performance of each model was evaluated with an independent test dataset generated in part from searching public and private genome-wide sequencing datasets from ~1.
5 million individuals.
Of the 2,447 cancer mutations, 691 corresponding germline variants had been previously classified in ClinVar: 426 (61.
6%) as likely pathogenic/pathogenic, 261 (37.
8%) as uncertain significance, and 4 (0.
6%) as likely benign/benign.
The odds ratio for a likely pathogenic/pathogenic classification in ClinVar was 28.
3 (95% confidence interval: 24.
2–33.
1, p < 0.
001), compared with all other germline missense variants in the same 216 genes.
Both supervised learning models showed high correlation with pathogenicity assessments in the training dataset.
There was high area under precision-recall curve values (0.
847 and 0.
829) and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve values (0.
821 and 0.
774) for logistic regression and random forest models, respectively, when applied to the test dataset.
With the use of cancer and germline datasets and supervised learning techniques, our study shows that cancer mutation data can be leveraged to improve the interpretation of germline missense variation potentially causing rare Mendelian disorders.

Related Results

Leveraging cancer mutation data to predict the pathogenicity of germline missense variants
Leveraging cancer mutation data to predict the pathogenicity of germline missense variants
ABSTRACTInnovative and easy-to-implement strategies are needed to improve the pathogenicity assessment of rare germline missense variants. Somatic cancer driver mutations identifie...
Marfan syndrome: genetic variant determinants of cardiovascular outcomes
Marfan syndrome: genetic variant determinants of cardiovascular outcomes
Abstract Background Marfan syndrome is a systemic connective tissue disorder caused by genetic variants in the fibrillin-1 (FBN1...
Narrowing of the neonatal region in the FBN1 gene
Narrowing of the neonatal region in the FBN1 gene
Abstract Background Neonatal Marfan syndrome (MFS) is considered the most severe form of MFS and is characterized by early child...
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract Women with one or more first-degree female relatives with a history of breast cancer have a two-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. This risk i...
Abstract ED02-04: Returning germline results to cancer patients
Abstract ED02-04: Returning germline results to cancer patients
Abstract Patient-centered communication, defined as providing clear, understandable information with active patient participation, can be especially challenging in t...

Back to Top